I disagree. Again, I ask you to research it and draw your own conclusions.
Evidence for creationism
- Thread starter Arakhor
- Start date
- Status
I disagree. Again, I ask you to research it and draw your own conclusions.
@Dom:
first of all, you allow WAY more evolution per time to explain all the dog breeding than classic evolution.
but I have a few questions for you:
- how many people built the Pyramids, and in what year?
- how many people were in Xerxes' army?
- please define 'kind' in the context of mammals
first of all, you allow WAY more evolution per time to explain all the dog breeding than classic evolution.
but I have a few questions for you:
- how many people built the Pyramids, and in what year?
- how many people were in Xerxes' army?
- please define 'kind' in the context of mammals
GhostWriter16
Deity
First question: I think the accepted year is 3,000 BC (Or something) with 35,000 slaves. I accept that conclusion.
Second Question: No idea. What does that have to do with it?
Third Question: Not sure exactly, if it means species or genus or what. Not really sure. I just know there is no evolution amongst the higher taxa.
Second Question: No idea. What does that have to do with it?
Third Question: Not sure exactly, if it means species or genus or what. Not really sure. I just know there is no evolution amongst the higher taxa.
Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
It would have to be species, then- without evolution, anything about the level of the species is entirely arbitrary, a human convenience. Once can only introduce objectivity with a cladistic model.
So you don't know anything about how evolution works, don't know any of the biological terms (you'd hardly be alone though) and yet you somehow still "know" that it doesn't work?
bathsheba666
Fast 'n Bulbous
God moves in mysterious ways.
Dumanios
Hakugyukurou Gardener
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,926
God likes to F*** with us.
Moderator Action: Maybe in the real world, but when you cannot follow simply directions, like not swearing, at CFC, will we step in.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Moderator Action: Maybe in the real world, but when you cannot follow simply directions, like not swearing, at CFC, will we step in.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Akka
Moody old mage.
No, you just have no sense of scale.
Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
While we're talking about dogs and stuff (well... we were) I'm just going to go ahead and post this:
Link to video.
Link to video.
Link to video.
Link to video.
sophie
Break My Heart
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. If all flightless species of animals in the whole world that are alive today were on the ark...bloody hell, how did they all fit? I mean that's millions upon millions of different species of animal...where did they all go?
I mean I think you'd be hard-pressed just to fit all the species of spiders on the ark, let alone the entire insect kingdom, let alone let alone all the other millions of different species of animals.
I mean I think you'd be hard-pressed just to fit all the species of spiders on the ark, let alone the entire insect kingdom, let alone let alone all the other millions of different species of animals.
GhostWriter16
Deity
I presume here is where "Kind" differs from species. I suspect there were only two spiders on the ark period. And only two dogs, two cats, two monkeys, exc. and microevolution took care of the rest.
Behind The Mask
King
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2010
- Messages
- 776
So you do believe in evolution after all!
Ajidica
High Quality Person
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2006
- Messages
- 22,482
Microevolution is simply the building blocks of macroevolution.
Goodgame, please spoiler that picture!
"Micro-evolution" is just a fancy term used by creationists who can't deny genetic variation and whom think that speciation is an affront before the Lord. (Evolutionism and creationism aren't opposed in the slightest, but that doesn't stop the creationists from trying.)
"Micro-evolution" is just a fancy term used by creationists who can't deny genetic variation and whom think that speciation is an affront before the Lord. (Evolutionism and creationism aren't opposed in the slightest, but that doesn't stop the creationists from trying.)
Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
You do realise that each one of those are unscientific folk taxa, don't you? "Spiders" aren't even a single infraorder, let alone anything so narrow as to constitute a realistic "kind".
Certainly, if you argue for two "monkeys", then one must accept that apes evolved from that kind- how else could New World monkeys be more closely related to apes than Old World monkeys if this were not so?- and from there it is not a great step to argue that humans, too, came from a similar line...
BasketCase
Username sez it all
Simple: all flightless species of animals that Noah knew of.
Side note: I'm an atheist.
Cu Chulainn
The Unoriginal
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,377
Why didn't the Egyptians notice the global flood? Persistent buggers just kept right on building monuments all the way through, it would seem.@Dom:
first of all, you allow WAY more evolution per time to explain all the dog breeding than classic evolution.
but I have a few questions for you:
- how many people built the Pyramids, and in what year?
- how many people were in Xerxes' army?
- please define 'kind' in the context of mammals
How did the kangaroos get from Australia to Mesopotamia and back, and why didn't they choose to stop anywhere else to live?
How did all those species of fish cope with the change in salinity?
Ajidica
High Quality Person
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2006
- Messages
- 22,482
God made it like that to test our faith.
Gods will. (Deus Vult)
Deus Vult!
Oddly enought, the warcry of the Crusaders was Deus lo vult!
- Status
