JoeM
Imperator
EzInKy said:There's a report of an unexploded bomb in Brighton now.
Got a link?
We're finding it hard to get online news, understandably...
EzInKy said:There's a report of an unexploded bomb in Brighton now.
GAH! read post 72Nobody said:But no time for jokes,
I know that Marla is wild, but if you really seriously think that French did it just because they were pissed that Paris wasn't selected...CoolioVonHoolio said:everyone thinks im trying to be funny! im not, did you see the videos of the french when they heard their not getting the olympics? what if some guys wernt right in the head? and they decided to go blow stuff up in london? it could happen nowadays. when they find out who did it; if its not the french i will apologize.
We'll know for sure it was AQ if evidence emerges that the buses were blown with suicide bombers.thisispete said:This does meet their modus operandi, though. A coordinated attack at rush hour on transportation. It seems like a squib compared to 9/11, but they don't have the capability or opportunity at the moment to pull off another 9/11. Look at the Madrid bombings. That was AQ, but a comparitivly small toll when compared to New York.
Drop the subject of "who's done it?" altogether until it is clear what happened exactly.CoolioVonHoolio said:ok lets just umm, drop the subject of the french and talk about the explosions. its obviously offending people
Honestly, I'm not offended. It's far too dumb as a theory to allow me to take any offense. I mean, someone who seriously launch such a theory sinks himself so deep into ridicule, that I don't have any offense nor revenge to get, as he's already punished himselfCoolioVonHoolio said:ok lets just umm, drop the subject of the french and talk about the explosions. its obviously offending people
Akka said:Well, precisely.
It's rush-hour time, and still it doesn't seems to have a lot of deaths, and it seems that most wounded were able to walk. Like if the charges have been planted precisely to explode in a way that cause minimal deaths.
So it's maybe a sort of "warning", like "you see, we can bomb you right into the rush hour, we've been nice this time, but imagine what it could become if we go for maximum casualties".
CoolioVonHoolio said:wow, i just heard 90 casualtys
Very good points. We still dont have a clear idea of the number of casualties. Still, whatever the casualties are, they would have been much higher if this had taken place yesterday.bigfatron said:Londoners are used to this kind of thing (though we've had a few years to forget since the IRA ceasefire) - it would be harder to plant large bombs without being noticed, as in Madrid.
Also we simply don't know what casualty figures will end up at - at the Kings Cross blast they are only just starting to bring out the seriously injured from the tube tunnel. The dead will come out last.
To give you an idea of the scale of this, the Hilton Hotel has been taken over as a triage centre for one of the main hospitals.
If you think these blasts were designed to avoid death and injury you are kidding yourself.
Well, no. I just took the reports I got so far, which talked about few deaths.bigfatron said:If you think these blasts were designed to avoid death and injury you are kidding yourself.
zulu9812 said:I'd just like to make a point:
Whilst the entire focus of the entire British Police Force was directed at us protestors and what we might get up to at Gleneagles, they ignored the real threat from actual terrorists.