Lexicus
Deity
No? The violence of the Nazi regime was definitely a means to an end.
I'm going to assume you haven't read any works by Nazi philosophers or theorists, and accordingly I'm going to go ahead and dismiss your opinion out of hand.
No? The violence of the Nazi regime was definitely a means to an end.
Maybe...just maybe....you can be right-wing on some things and left-wing on others....maybe
I'll go ahead and take that as an admission of defeat.I'm going to assume you haven't read any works by Nazi philosophers or theorists, and accordingly I'm going to go ahead and dismiss your opinion out of hand.
I read the book by David Irving on the Goebbels diaries, Mastermind of the 3rd Reich. Is that any help?I'm going to assume you haven't read any works by Nazi philosophers or theorists, and accordingly I'm going to go ahead and dismiss your opinion out of hand.
Of course. But when you murder someone, that's your right-wing side taking control. I mean this is self-evident and doesn't need any justification. Obviously.
Yeahno.No? The violence of the Nazi regime was definitely a means to an end.
I'm sure the millions killed by Pol Por, Mao or Stalin really cared about that distinction.
Excuse me for interrupting, but doesn't the emboldened imply that the ongoing violence was a means to the end of "creating and maintaining a pure Aryan race"?Yeahno.
Nazi ideology explicitly saw violence as inherent in creating and maintaining a pure Aryan race. Violence and conflict kept the race strong and would allow the Aryans to triumph over all in an apocalyptic clash of civilizations. For the Nazis it wasn't just a matter of "lets murder several million sub-humans, then we will have superior Aryan skull shape throughout the Reich". Murdering untold millions of sub-humans was inherent and inseparable from Nazi ideology.
Depends how robust the throwing is, I'd say.
The length of stay and the overcrowding aren't violent in themselves, no. Unjust and inhuman, yes.
If violence was an end in itself (the only alternative to "means to an end" that I can see, for the moment), they'd have been violent with everyone, including themselves, all the time when they weren't actually pausing to draw breath.
When you murder someone because they're a foreigner, yes, that is an act of right-wing political violence. Sorry you don't want to admit it or whatever. Tell me, is it because you hate foreigners and don't want to be identified as right-wing, or are you right-wing and don't want to be identified with hating foreigners?
...which honestly makes the whole "right/left-wing" dichotomy largely meaningless, or at least extremely arbitrary.Maybe...just maybe....you can be right-wing on some things and left-wing on others....maybe
didn't the khmer rouge hate foreigners so much they slaughtered their own countrymen for showing any evidence of foreign influence, like even eyeglasses?