Link to attached save might be useless, since its an old version.
Just seconding the problem showing it still persists.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=7683518&postcount=1222
FfH2 Bug Thread
- Thread starter Kael
- Start date
Link to attached save might be useless, since its an old version.
Just seconding the problem showing it still persists.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=7683518&postcount=1222
"The mercurian gate can be opened even before demons arrives on EREBUS !!
buy this newspaper, you will know all about it...!!"
3 recent games I know had someone opening the mercurian gate without seeing a trace of Hyborem.
-my brothers game (0.40z): ashen veil isn't even founded, the lanun are mated with basium since 100turns.
-1 game of mine : (0.41a) : ashen veil was founded, but not the infernal pact, as the shaim were razed by basium and his friends the kurios.
-1 friend (0.41c) : mercurians appeared before the infernal pact : not even a trace of hyborem existence on the end-game powergraph.
I hope it's just our games, but it is rather frustating having someone getting an ally this early in the game
buy this newspaper, you will know all about it...!!"
3 recent games I know had someone opening the mercurian gate without seeing a trace of Hyborem.
-my brothers game (0.40z): ashen veil isn't even founded, the lanun are mated with basium since 100turns.
-1 game of mine : (0.41a) : ashen veil was founded, but not the infernal pact, as the shaim were razed by basium and his friends the kurios.
-1 friend (0.41c) : mercurians appeared before the infernal pact : not even a trace of hyborem existence on the end-game powergraph.
I hope it's just our games, but it is rather frustating having someone getting an ally this early in the game
MagisterCultuum
Great Sage
The Mercurian Gate has not required the Infernals be in the game first since Shadow. This is intentional.
![[to_xp]Gekko](https://civfanatics-data.community.forum/avatars/m/74/74677.jpg?1475248346){kind=avatar}
[to_xp]Gekko
QCT junkie
not really a bug, but kinda serious: when you cast March of the trees, the resulting spike in the power graph will cause all AIs to be very very willing to become your vassals.
Rystic
Turtle Wizard
I got this error a few days ago.
shapecharge
Chieftain
Yeap this was exactly the issue and I am patched to .41D, not the biggest deal in the world but if the option is there and someone chooses it it should work. I will post a saved game if it comes up again unfortunately I do not have a save from before...also curious if the other monument inscriptions work as designed is it a problem with that whole event or just the +1 health option....Thanks for the back-up YH
MagisterCultuum
Great Sage
I think it was mostly because the AI was so bad at actually summoning Hyborem that those who wanted to switch to Basium were practically forced to go AV, summon Hyborem themselves, switch back to something else, and then build the gate.
[to_xp]Gekko
QCT junkie
not necessarily a bug, but civs that get nothing from a tech should have that tech blocked for them to make sure that the AI doesn't waste a hundred turns on them ( because they will 
) . Elves with Rage is a good example of this.
) . Elves with Rage is a good example of this.
Broken Hawk
Emperor
I researched Gunpowder while playing the Hippus. No Arquebus or Cannon units for me. I guess I am dumb as the AI. If the pedia states that important piece of knowledge I missed it.
Emptiness
[]
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,922
The Technology Advisor (or tech tree, opened by pressing F6) displays civ-specific information about what each technology offers, as you can see from this example:
Consulting the tech tree to make research decisions is a good idea for many reasons, including the fact that it will allow you to see what each technology offers for your specific civ.
Spoiler Tasunke's Blasting Powder entry :
Broken Hawk
Emperor
Thanks. That is very helpful. Forgot about Man 'O Wars.
for the mines 
Broken Hawk
Emperor
[to_xp]Gekko
QCT junkie
umh, giant spider's chance to create a baby spider is still set at 3% , outrageously low. didn't it use to be a lot higher before it got messed up some versions ago? this way you'll never get a baby spider, and it's not like baby spiders are very useful as well.
and baby spiders upgrading to giants spiders on combat is 2% even worse since they have a very hard time winning a combat already. pretty sure they should be 30 and 20 instead of 3 and 2. wolves and lions upgrading on combat set at 10% seems kinda low too, but at least reasonable. spiders just seem bugged.
and baby spiders upgrading to giants spiders on combat is 2% even worse since they have a very hard time winning a combat already. pretty sure they should be 30 and 20 instead of 3 and 2. wolves and lions upgrading on combat set at 10% seems kinda low too, but at least reasonable. spiders just seem bugged.
[to_xp]Gekko
QCT junkie
[to_xp]Gekko;8357013 said:
just checked in FF, and there baby spiders have 50% chance to upgrade on successful combat, which seems right considering how weak they are. giant spiders have 10% chance to create baby spider from combat, which also seems reasonable. so I guess something is not right here. I remember wolves and lions upgrading chances were wrong a while ago, so I guess spiders have the same issue but it hasn't been solved for them yet.
[to_xp]Gekko
QCT junkie
units with HN cannot capture enemy units, like workers for example. they just destroy them instead.
Pardon me again.
It was brought up from a few other ppl in the meantime aswell.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=7333994&postcount=95
