Disenfrancised
Beep Beep
First 50 years sent, however I am not going to finish the rest tonight citing it being hard to type when your hands are covered in bandages!
Type through th pain!!!First 50 years sent, however I am not going to finish the rest tonight citing it being hard to type when your hands are covered in bandages!
If tonight is difficult, wait until tomorrow if that helps.I've been studying for AP tests coming up this week, so my orders will be in a little later tonight. Sorry for the delay.
If tonight is difficult, wait until tomorrow if that helps.
Also, the names of the gods are random juxtapositions of ITL Roman and Greek names (e.g: Zeupiter, Heuno, Mermes, Aphronus, etc.)
Please not the war-crazed Animas![]()
Animas has lost so many players!?!
Most of them weren't being very active anyway, but yeah, new people are sorely needed. On the other hand, that also speaks for our superior level of advancement; you still have your puny ethnic nations, while we are already on the brink of an imperial age. Which is good. Big empires are good.
But your nations are so tiny...In population![]()
Oh but I have an elitist opinion of the people in my own cradle too; I'm more comparing my nations pop![]()
Manonash people are supposed to count as 2 those stats are out of date.
Very well, but you were engaging a statement made asserting the dominance of Animas, with a counterexample against our kleos.
Er, the population averages per PC nation are more or less equal, the world average being 2.23. We're actually significantly larger on average than Manipur, for instance, and Manonash nations have just barely more people.
Manonash: 2.36
Animas: 2.34
Manipur: 2.00
So... I defy your statement![]()
Just jealous![]()
Pah! Jealous of what?! I rule the Heart of Darkness.
EDIT:
@emu: Well, duh, we'll have less. We have far less playersThe point is, Kal said "your nations are tiny," not "your cradle is tiny."