General Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the merits of this depend upon whether the cap is made of the same type of plastic as the bottle.

Yes, recycling centres are often not set up (because of cost) to recycle items made of mixed materials. Toothpaste tubes are a nightmare for them. If the cap is made of different materials to the bottle and attached to it it will just mean they will stop recycling the bottles.
 
Exactly what @AmazonQueen said. if the people recycling your plastic are telling you "no bottle caps" that's because their process can't take them and if any are found entire batches are going straight into the trash.
 
I don't see how Biden thought he would threaten China in its own region, but it would easily backfire.

upload_2022-5-25_16-54-24.png


Japan is a nice country, but not a great military power - and China tends to treat it with contempt diplomatically.
 
Who is it again who is trying to steal elections with fraudulent behavior?

Probe of Signatures Roils Michigan Race
BY KRIS MAHER

Five Republican contenders for governor in Michigan could be disqualified after a state elections bureau said it found tens of thousands of forged signatures gathered by petition circulators.

The Michigan Bureau of Elections said late Monday that it found 68,000 invalid signatures on petitions across 10 Republican campaigns, leaving five campaigns short of the needed 15,000 signatures to qualify for the August primary. The winner of the primary will face Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in November.

The bureau of elections’ findings threatened to scramble the primary, because two of the leading contenders were among those without enough valid signatures: James Craig, a former Detroit police chief, and Perry Johnson, a Bloom-field Hills businessman. John Yob, a consultant for Mr. Johnson, said he thought the bureau didn’t have the right to void every signature collected by the alleged forgers. He said the campaign could pursue legal action if necessary. Mr. Johnson said it was clear to him that the petition process needed to be overhauled and made more secure. The bureau found that his campaign turned in 13,800 valid signatures and 9,393 that were invalid.

Mr. Craig’s campaign submitted 10,192 signatures that were valid, and 11,113 were invalid, according to the bureau. His campaign couldn’t immediately be reached to comment. Ron Weiser, chairman of the Michigan Republican Party, alleged that Democrats in the state were trying to disqualify GOP candidates. “Democrats claim to be champions of democracy but are actively angling behind the scenes to disqualify their opponents in an unprecedented way because they want to take away choice from Michigan voters after years of terrible policies,” he said.

The bureau said in its report that it didn’t have reason to believe at this point that candidates or campaigns were aware of the fraudulent petition circulators. Elections-bureau staff identified 36 petition circulators hired by campaigns who submitted fraudulent petition sheets that consisted of entirely invalid signatures, the bureau said. Among the indicators of fraud were nearly identical handwriting on petition sheets and a practice known as “round tabling,” in which a petition is passed around in a circle to make it appear as though the signatures are from actual voters.

The bureau said that it will be up to Michigan’s Board of State Canvassers to determine whether the candidates have enough valid signatures to qualify to be on the ballot. The four-member board, with two Republican and two Democratic members, could make a determination at a scheduled hearing on Thursday. The other candidates whose signatures fell short are Michael Brown, a state police captain, Michael Markey, a financial adviser, and Donna Brandenburg, a businesswoman.

Mr. Brown said Tuesday he was withdrawing from the race after the alleged fraudulent signature gathering came to light. “I cannot and will not be associated with this activity,” he said. Representatives for Mr. Markey’s and Ms. Brandenburg’s campaigns couldn’t be reached to comment.

Five Republican contenders for governor could be disqualified.
 
Mr. Craig’s campaign submitted 10,192 signatures that were valid, and 11,113 were invalid, according to the bureau. His campaign couldn’t immediately be reached to comment. Ron Weiser, chairman of the Michigan Republican Party, alleged that Democrats in the state were trying to disqualify GOP candidates. “Democrats claim to be champions of democracy but are actively angling behind the scenes to disqualify their opponents in an unprecedented way because they want to take away choice from Michigan voters after years of terrible policies,” he said.

This level of projection is just amazing
 
It is truly astonishing, but they don't care. Cheats, liars and crooks everyone.
 
Highly respectable (though only by other notables, both dead and alive) Kissinger, recently stated that Ukraine should give up some territories to Russia, for peace to happen.

He was so into that sort of strategy when he had power wasn't he? Giving up on ones countries national interest for the sake of world peace was really a hallmark of his geopolitics.
 
From this, it seems DuckDuckGo was getting the feed from MS, so they were doing it but did not initiate it and I guess probably did not know.
that's not ideal for obvious reasons, but iirc they also publicly stated they would futz with search results wrt ukraine-russia too.
It looks like they are not so good, and doing more dodgy stuff with micro$oft under a contractual obligation:

DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers

"I tested the DuckDuckGo so-called private browser for both iOS and Android, yet neither version blocked data transfers to Microsoft's Linkedin + Bing ads while viewing Facebook's workplace[.]com homepage," Edwards explained in a Twitter thread.

With regard to the company's browsers, DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg said DuckDuckGo blocks Microsoft third-party cookies (used for ad tracking) on third-party websites, but acknowledged there are some trackers (scripts used for tracking) that DuckDuckGo's browsers do not block due to contractual commitments with Microsoft.

"For non-search tracker blocking (e.g. in our browser), we block most third-party trackers," said Weinberg. "Unfortunately our Microsoft search syndication agreement prevents us from doing more to Microsoft-owned properties. However, we have been continually pushing and expect to be doing more soon."

"What we're talking about here is an above-and-beyond protection that most browsers don't even attempt to do — that is, blocking third-party tracking scripts before they load on third-party websites," added Weinberg in a statement emailed to The Register.

In other words, DuckDuckGo offers better than average privacy protections in its browsers but looks the other way for Microsoft-owned scripts – for Bing and LinkedIn – so they can continue loading on third-party websites like Workplace and gathering data.​
 
Can someone explain how the EU spends 180 billion euros on the police but the only person who cares that massive companies are illegally sending our data to the US is some young lawyer who is not taxpayer funded at all?

Campaigners warn of legal challenge against Privacy Shield enhancements

European privacy campaigner Max Schrems is warning that enhancements to the EU-US Privacy Shield data-sharing arrangements might face a legal challenge if negotiators don't take a new approach.

In an open letter, Schrems – the lawyer behind the Schrems II ruling which put an end to the transatlantic data-sharing agreement – said that US assurances of EU citizens' data privacy would be insufficient to avoid another legal challenge.

"We understand that the US has rejected any material protections for non-US persons and is continuing to discriminate against non-US persons by refusing baseline protections, such as judicial approval of individual surveillance measures," the lawyer wrote.

"We understand that the envisioned deal will largely rely on US executive orders. Having worked on this matter with US surveillance experts and lawyers, such executive orders seem to be structurally insufficient to meet the requirements of the CJEU."​
 
He was so into that sort of strategy when he had power wasn't he? Giving up on ones countries national interest for the sake of world peace was really a hallmark of his geopolitics.
He's practically the quintessential Cold Warrior, at this point. Today's his 99th birthday.
 
He's practically the quintessential Cold Warrior, at this point. Today's his 99th birthday.

And the flood of propaganda around Ukraine has deranged people sufficiently that I recently read a few news pieces about his comments on the war, and the comments were full of people calling him a paid shill of the Chinese Communist Party...that's markedly more insane than all the John Birch lunatics from the Cold War...
 
It is legal and there are plans for the the POTUS to:
  • Suspend the writ of habeas corpus
  • Implement rationing
  • Detain anyone designated a foreign enemy
  • Turn off all internet connectivity and telephone lines
  • Lock down the use of US passports to prevent travel
And that is only the small fraction of Presidential Emergency Action Documents that they have let the public see, for example from the Shrub era 500 are released, 6,000 are not.

Source Writeup
 
I'm not surprised that Kissinger has suggested Ukraine cede territory for peace, and I wouldn't put him just down to him being the quintessential Cold Warrior; his dissertation at Harvard was about Metternich and the international relations of the Great Powers in 19th century Europe, which I think shaped his views on realpolitik that predated even his active role in policymaking.

Kissinger had also taken a soft line on Russia's annexation of Crimea back in 2014, that the U.S./West should not entirely reject the Russian claim and continue the de jure recognition that Crimea belongs to Ukraine. I would have to listen to him speak on the matter more, because there is a balance of recognizing what is and what in our moral sphere ought to be.

I mean if we were going for pure Wilsonian, democratize everywhere, how many tanks and guns will we need to steamroll China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Zimbabwe? Two of those countries have nuclear weapons, one of them has a key strategic resource, and the other has potentially negative racial connotations and I don't think South Africa, regional hegemon, would want a self-appointed body of well-meaning interventionists to begin stirring up trouble that could have greater regional consequences. So ultimately, there comes a balance of doing what is right and doing what is possible.
 
So ultimately, there comes a balance of doing what is right and doing what is possible.
In this case it is between two things that are possible, keep fighting, more young men getting killed and possibly resulting in nuclear war, or giving up strategic positions and industrial regions for peace. One could make the claim that giving up land would be good for the young men, or for mankind's long term survival, but will hurt the "nation". Kissinger had lots of chances to promote peace that would have stopped young men dying and reduced the chance of nuclear war, but he did not take any when it would have been his country losing national interest.
 
In other news, Iran seized two greek-owned tankers, and threatens to seize 17more (!).
The move comes in retaliation to Greece acting like a protectorate and handing an iranian tanker to the US.

One wonders what exactly the US is going to do about this. Probably nothing; they don't care, only cared to order their local help to act against Iran, but now will whistle indifferently.

Then again, given that Iran is in the sphere of Russia, this move isn't at all unrelated with our government of clowns being more pro-US than the US itself in all that too. Again with nothing given in return.

https://www.ft.com/content/0bdde91a-21d3-4d97-8879-a79b9bd2b0cf
 
In other news, Iran seized two greek-owned tankers, and threatens to seize 17more (!).
The move comes in retaliation to Greece acting like a protectorate and handing an iranian tanker to the US.

One wonders what exactly the US is going to do about this. Probably nothing; they don't care, only cared to order their local help to act against Iran, but now will whistle indifferently.

Exactly the same thing happened when the USA got the
UK to get the Gibraltar government to seize a tanker.

The fact is the USA is an unreliable ally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom