General Politics Three: But what is left/right?

AM Car Radio Fate Lies With Congress
BY JULIE BYKOWICZ AND TED MANN
WASHINGTON—AM radio advocates including conservative talk show hosts like Hugh Hewitt and federal emergency officials are lobbying Congress to stop carmakers from dropping the old medium. Tesla, Volvo , and BMW are among the companies that have already stopped providing AM tuners in some models. Last year Ford said it would join them—until CEO Jim Farley reversed course “after speaking with policy leaders.” Lawmakers say most car companies are noncommittal, so they want to require them by law to keep making cars with free AM radio. Support-ers argue it is a critical piece of the emergency communication network, while the automakers say Americans have plenty of other ways to receive alerts and information.

The legislation has united lawmakers who ordinarily want nothing to do with one another. Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Ed Markey (D., Mass.) are leading the Senate effort, and on the House side, Republican Speaker Mike Johnson—a former conservative talk radio host in Louisiana—and progressive “squad” member Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) are among about 200 co-sponsors. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D, N.J.), who introduced the House bill, plans Monday to ask the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require a safety warning on price stickers of vehicles that lack AM radio.

There are more than 4,500 AM radio stations in the U.S., the president of the National Association of Broadcasters, Curtis LeGeyt, said. More than 400,000 listeners have contacted lawmakers, he said. Hewitt, a radio host since 1990, said, “There’s a diversity of thought and fun in radio that you can’t get from pod-casts.” He also makes an argument that resonates with Cruz and other conservatives: “Their last chance of getting a fair interview is going away.” The prospect of losing AM in vehicles has also caused alarm in Latino media, said Sylvia Banderas Coffinet, chief executive of Latino Media Network, which owns more than a dozen stations. AM radio DJs are “trusted voices in the community,” she said.

The medium has long been in decline. A spring 2023 Nielsen survey, the most recent one available, showed that AM radio reaches about 78 million Americans every month, down from nearly 107 million in the spring of 2016, one of the earliest periods for Nielsen data.
Tiffany Moore, senior vice president of political and industry affairs for the Consumer Technology Association, said automakers and tech advocacy groups have told lawmakers that an AM-radio requirement would be “inconsistent with the principles of a free market.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.), who blocked passage of the Senate bill in December, noted the irony of Republicans like Cruz arguing for government mandates on private business. Both the Senate and House bills keep picking up new supporters.
Automakers say the rise of electric vehicles is driving the shift away from AM, because onboard electronics interfere with AM radio signals. Shielding to reduce interference would cost carmakers $3.8 billion over seven years, estimates the Alliance for Auto-motive Innovation, a car-industry trade group.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency says that more than 75 mostly AM radio stations, covering at least 90% of the population, are equipped to continue broadcasting during and after an emergency. Seven former FEMA administrators urged Congress last year to seek assurances from auto makers that they would keep broadcast radio available. Carmakers counter that FEMA’s own alert systems are designed to break in across multiple platforms. Most Americans received the Oct. 4 nationwide test of the emergency alert system on their phones, while about 1% of the population heard it on AM radio, according to a study by the Consumer Technology Association.

The bill unites lawmakers who ordinarily want nothing to do with each other.


A number of carmakers have dropped AM from some models. GETTY IMAGES

Automakers increasingly want to put features “behind a paywall,” Markey said. Auto executives have said that the “software-defined vehicle” provides opportunities to sell drivers subscriptions for features from heated seats to entertainment services. General Motors Chief Executive Mary Barra told investors in October that GM was positioning itself “to drive significant revenue growth from subscriptions in the future.” Markey compared auto-industry resistance to previous opposition to mandates like air bags. “Leaving safety decisions to the auto industry is very dangerous,” he said.
 
There’s a diversity of thought and fun in radio that you can’t get from pod-casts.”
If he really thinks there is not diversity of thought in podcasts he needs to get out a bit on the internet.
Automakers say the rise of electric vehicles is driving the shift away from AM, because onboard electronics interfere with AM radio signals. Shielding to reduce interference would cost carmakers $3.8 billion over seven years, estimates the Alliance for Auto-motive Innovation, a car-industry trade group.
The antenna is on top of the car, and shielded through the car, else you here the engine frequency as a variable wine through the speakers. If the RF leakages if too much for the occupant what will it be like for the cars around it in a traffic jam?
Automakers increasingly want to put features “behind a paywall,” Markey said.
This is what they should be legislating against, or at least ensuring that people can get around it with some sort of "right to repair".
 
Ah yeah, that must explain why Greece started to get the biggest immigration waves around the 2010's, that must be because of colonization that ended 50 years before. And here I thought that it was because of the Syrian civil war.
I could throw back a lot of jabs at the middle-school level of education, BTW, but that would serve little point and only increases the acrymony.

I just want to zero in on one little point here: why do you seem to believe that historical events have a discrete time limit beyond which they can no longer have any impact? 50 years - as if events much longer ago than 50 years do not still impact the present?
 
If he really thinks there is not diversity of thought in podcasts he needs to get out a bit on the internet.

The antenna is on top of the car, and shielded through the car, else you here the engine frequency as a variable wine through the speakers. If the RF leakages if too much for the occupant what will it be like for the cars around it in a traffic jam?

This is what they should be legislating against, or at least ensuring that people can get around it with some sort of "right to repair".
NM's biggest (and regional) AM station is migrating to FM. I wonder how this will impact conservative talk radio.
 
NM's biggest (and regional) AM station is migrating to FM. I wonder how this will impact conservative talk radio.
That does raise the question. If they are getting rid of AM radios are they leaving FM? Is not the point that they want to move all entertainment behind a paywall?
 
It's been a group effort. You know it and I know it.

I mean, kinda? There are interests suited by the status quo, but the consistent sticking point in all the negotiations has been the GOP's unwillingness to support any provision that could be spun as "amnesty".
 
That does raise the question. If they are getting rid of AM radios are they leaving FM? Is not the point that they want to move all entertainment behind a paywall?
Yes FM will remain.
 
I mean, kinda? There are interests suited by the status quo, but the consistent sticking point in all the negotiations has been the GOP's unwillingness to support any provision that could be spun as "amnesty".
Yeah, path to citizenship or whatever. Durbin helped make sure it didn't happen then, and Trump plays the heel now. Whee. Oh boy, the political confluence of racism, sane intake policy, and labor.
 
I just want to zero in on one little point here: why do you seem to believe that historical events have a discrete time limit beyond which they can no longer have any impact? 50 years - as if events much longer ago than 50 years do not still impact the present?
Of course historical events have a much longer time span during which they have effects - you could even argue that they might never really stop having some sort of consequences. History itself is a pile of events that feed on each others and can have consequences centuries or millenia after they happen.
But let me ask back : what do you seem to believe that historical events which happened decades ago and which didn't cause big waves of migration through Greece until now, would suddenly be the one reason it happens in the late 2010 ?
 
But let me ask back : what do you seem to believe that historical events which happened decades ago and which didn't cause big waves of migration through Greece until now, would suddenly be the one reason it happens in the late 2010 ?
Some of the reasons, yes.
 
Of course historical events have a much longer time span during which they have effects - you could even argue that they might never really stop having some sort of consequences. History itself is a pile of events that feed on each others and can have consequences centuries or millenia after they happen.
But let me ask back : what do you seem to believe that historical events which happened decades ago and which didn't cause big waves of migration through Greece until now, would suddenly be the one reason it happens in the late 2010 ?

I believe that the manner of French colonial rule in Syria demonstrably contributed to the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War, actually. Specifically the French were the ones who literally divided what is now Syria into ethnic and religious blocs (not to mention breaking Lebanon off as a separate country), part of a strategy of empowering Syria's various ethnic and religious minorities so as to have some local counterweights to the Sunni Arab majority and generally to impede the development of a united Syrian nationalism in opposition to French rule.

Here is a handy article covering this stuff:
 
AM Car Radio Fate Lies With Congress
BY JULIE BYKOWICZ AND TED MANN
WASHINGTON—AM radio advocates including conservative talk show hosts like Hugh Hewitt and federal emergency officials are lobbying Congress to stop carmakers from dropping the old medium. Tesla, Volvo , and BMW are among the companies that have already stopped providing AM tuners in some models. Last year Ford said it would join them—until CEO Jim Farley reversed course “after speaking with policy leaders.” Lawmakers say most car companies are noncommittal, so they want to require them by law to keep making cars with free AM radio. Support-ers argue it is a critical piece of the emergency communication network, while the automakers say Americans have plenty of other ways to receive alerts and information.

The legislation has united lawmakers who ordinarily want nothing to do with one another. Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Ed Markey (D., Mass.) are leading the Senate effort, and on the House side, Republican Speaker Mike Johnson—a former conservative talk radio host in Louisiana—and progressive “squad” member Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) are among about 200 co-sponsors. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D, N.J.), who introduced the House bill, plans Monday to ask the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require a safety warning on price stickers of vehicles that lack AM radio.

There are more than 4,500 AM radio stations in the U.S., the president of the National Association of Broadcasters, Curtis LeGeyt, said. More than 400,000 listeners have contacted lawmakers, he said. Hewitt, a radio host since 1990, said, “There’s a diversity of thought and fun in radio that you can’t get from pod-casts.” He also makes an argument that resonates with Cruz and other conservatives: “Their last chance of getting a fair interview is going away.” The prospect of losing AM in vehicles has also caused alarm in Latino media, said Sylvia Banderas Coffinet, chief executive of Latino Media Network, which owns more than a dozen stations. AM radio DJs are “trusted voices in the community,” she said.

The medium has long been in decline. A spring 2023 Nielsen survey, the most recent one available, showed that AM radio reaches about 78 million Americans every month, down from nearly 107 million in the spring of 2016, one of the earliest periods for Nielsen data.
Tiffany Moore, senior vice president of political and industry affairs for the Consumer Technology Association, said automakers and tech advocacy groups have told lawmakers that an AM-radio requirement would be “inconsistent with the principles of a free market.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.), who blocked passage of the Senate bill in December, noted the irony of Republicans like Cruz arguing for government mandates on private business. Both the Senate and House bills keep picking up new supporters.
Automakers say the rise of electric vehicles is driving the shift away from AM, because onboard electronics interfere with AM radio signals. Shielding to reduce interference would cost carmakers $3.8 billion over seven years, estimates the Alliance for Auto-motive Innovation, a car-industry trade group.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency says that more than 75 mostly AM radio stations, covering at least 90% of the population, are equipped to continue broadcasting during and after an emergency. Seven former FEMA administrators urged Congress last year to seek assurances from auto makers that they would keep broadcast radio available. Carmakers counter that FEMA’s own alert systems are designed to break in across multiple platforms. Most Americans received the Oct. 4 nationwide test of the emergency alert system on their phones, while about 1% of the population heard it on AM radio, according to a study by the Consumer Technology Association.

The bill unites lawmakers who ordinarily want nothing to do with each other.


A number of carmakers have dropped AM from some models. GETTY IMAGES

Automakers increasingly want to put features “behind a paywall,” Markey said. Auto executives have said that the “software-defined vehicle” provides opportunities to sell drivers subscriptions for features from heated seats to entertainment services. General Motors Chief Executive Mary Barra told investors in October that GM was positioning itself “to drive significant revenue growth from subscriptions in the future.” Markey compared auto-industry resistance to previous opposition to mandates like air bags. “Leaving safety decisions to the auto industry is very dangerous,” he said.
Isn't AM where some of the emergency broadcasting happens in the US? There's remote places here where a car tuned to the national broadcaster ABC, on an AM frequency, would be the primary source of information during some electricity-interrupting natural disasters.
 

Haji Malang: The Sufi shrine caught up in a religious row in Mumbai​

A Sufi shrine frequented by Indians of all faiths made headlines recently after a top political leader said that he wanted to "liberate" it for just Hindus. The BBC's Cherylann Mollan visited to understand what the controversy was about.

The ascent is no easy feat, with some 1,500 rock-cut steps separating the devout from their destination: a Sufi saint's tomb that has become a seat of faith, legend and disputed history.

The Haji Malang dargah (shrine), sitting on a hill on the outskirts of Mumbai in the western state of Maharashtra, is said to house the tomb of an Arab missionary who came to India more than 700 years ago. Like many other Sufi shrines across India, the dargah is seen as a symbol of assimilation and tolerance, despite being at the centre of a religious dispute.

When I visited, both Hindus and Muslims were offering flowers and a chadar - a piece of cloth offered as a symbol of respect in Sufi traditions - at the saint's tomb. The belief is that any wish asked for with a "pure heart" will be granted.

The shrine's managing board mirrors this sense of respectful co-existence - while two of its trustees are Muslims, its hereditary custodians are from a Hindu Brahmin family.

But earlier this month, Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde stirred controversy by reviving a decades-old claim at a political rally. He asserted that the structure, traditionally considered a dargah, was a temple belonging to Hindus, and declared his commitment to "liberating" it.

Mr Shinde did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.

His claim comes at a time when some prominent mosques and Muslim-made monuments in India are mired in disputes over claims that they were constructed by demolishing Hindu temples centuries ago.

In the 1980s, Mr Shinde's political mentor, Anand Dighe, spearheaded a campaign to "reclaim" the Haji Malang dargah for Hindus. In 1996, he reportedly led 20,000 workers from the Shiv Sena party inside the dargah to perform a pooja (a Hindu act of worship).

Since then, Hindu hardliners, who refer to the structure as Malanggad, have continued the practice of performing pooja at the shrine on full Moon days, occasionally leading to clashes with Muslim devotees and locals.

But political observers say that Mr Shinde's stance may have less to do with faith and more to do with optics. Dighe's campaign had bumped up his appeal among Hindu voters in Maharashtra state.

"Mr Shinde is now trying to position himself as the 'Hindu saviour' of Maharashtra," says Prashant Dixit, a former journalist.

Separate from the national election, Maharashtra - India's wealthiest state - will vote for the state assembly later this year. Securing support from the Hindu majority is crucial for Mr Shinde, given the state's distinctive political landscape, says Mr Dixit.

Elections in Maharashtra are usually a four-way contest between the nativist, Hindu nationalist Shiv Sena and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the centrist Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Congress, each with their own share of core voters.

But Mr Shinde faces an additional complication - in 2022, he and his supporters defected from the erstwhile Shiv Sena.

The rebellion toppled the then-triparty government - an unlikely coalition of the Shiv Sena, Congress and NCP - and forged a new alliance with the BJP to form the new government.

"But while lawmakers might change parties, it's hard to get core voters to switch loyalties," Mr Dixit says. "By raising the dargah issue, Mr Shinde is hoping to appeal to the emotions of the core voters of the erstwhile Shiv Sena and consolidate the Hindu vote bank," he says.

Hindu devotees the BBC spoke to had mixed reactions to Mr Shinde's comments.

Kushal Misl, for instance, sees Mr Shinde as articulating what has long been on his mind - a belief that the shrine originally belonged to a Hindu saint and was later taken over by Muslims during invasions in India.

Rajendra Gaikwad shares a similar view but says that he feels uneasy about the ongoing debate. "Whatever is happening in India right now is very bad," he says, and underscores his belief that for him, "all gods are one".

Abhijit Nagare, who goes to the shrine every month, says that it doesn't matter to him which religion the structure belongs to - he likes to visit because he feels at peace there.

Nasir Khan, one of the shrine's trustees, told the BBC that the controversy had led to a dip in the number of devotees visiting the shrine. "People come with their families and don't want to be hassled by miscreants," he said.

The controversy is also hurting local businesses.

The structure sitting atop the 3,000ft (914m) hill doesn't stand alone. The elevation is punctuated with houses, shops, and restaurants carved into the stone and rock over the years.

Mr Khan says that about 4,000 people, both Hindus and Muslims, live there. The locals depend on tourism to make a living, but it's a tough existence.

Locals told the BBC that they struggle to get basic amenities like potable water, especially in the gruelling summer months.

"Water has to be rationed. Each family is given just 10 litres of water per day," says Ayyub Shaikh, a local village council member.

The hill also doesn't have a proper hospital, school or an ambulance.

"An educated person would not want to live here; there's nothing for them to do," says 22-year-old tuk-tuk driver Shaikh, who asked for only his first name to be used.

"All politicians want to do is play games to get votes. Nobody really cares about what the people want."

The sentiment is echoed by numerous locals.

"Hindus and Muslims have co-existed in harmony on this hill for centuries," Mr Shaikh says. "We celebrate festivals together and support each other in times of need.

"Nobody else stands by us - so why would we fight among ourselves?"
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68090708
 
Isn't AM where some of the emergency broadcasting happens in the US? There's remote places here where a car tuned to the national broadcaster ABC, on an AM frequency, would be the primary source of information during some electricity-interrupting natural disasters.
Here, too. I rather doubt the Tesla crowd cares.
 
Isn't AM where some of the emergency broadcasting happens in the US? There's remote places here where a car tuned to the national broadcaster ABC, on an AM frequency, would be the primary source of information during some electricity-interrupting natural disasters.
Yes, and that is the claim made by many stations, but nowadays, those same alerts get broadcast over cell phone networks and can reach far more people.
 
A Sufi shrine frequented by Indians of all faiths made headlines recently after a top political leader said that he wanted to "liberate" it for just Hindus.
The Sufi are kinda like the bonobos in the primate world. Messing with them is just wrong.
 
Yes, and that is the claim made by many stations, but nowadays, those same alerts get broadcast over cell phone networks and can reach far more people.
Gotta consolidate that media. Still too many randos not properly ticky-tacked.
 
Gotta consolidate that media. Still too many randos not properly ticky-tacked.
Sinclair broadcasting is trying to do that.
 
I don't doubt it. How much they got so far?
 
Top Bottom