Your comparing me to the KKK when I was strictly talking about the bourgeoise. Did my comment about the bourgeoise offend you because it makes you look less "smart and great" than you claim to be?
Oh man could you imagine how cool your side of the conversation would be to me if you had actually read both of the images I posted so we can intelligently discuss this instead of you reading literally one line of the poster and getting upset because somebody on this hellforum called you out?
Or is it the fact that the so called bourgeoise might not be so clear cut and real as you like to believe?
Galaxy-brained "maybe being part of the bourgeoisie is just a state of mind what is bourgeoisie really". If you want, I can explain entry-level Marxism. I'm sure you had to have learned about it since they at last taught that much in the decrepit relic that you people call an "education system".
What are you even doing here? You did a drive-by post and now its, "uWu you compared my Klan talking point to Klan talking point how dare you good sir".
I mean you are in a forum with actual communists, a world wide forum that has people who know the difference between a social democrat and a communist unlike almost every American I know personally lol. Did you think you would not get called out?
So communists must take real offense to the fact that the bourgeoise might not exist. Probably makes sense, after all their whole ideology is about combating this "common menace" if they found out it didn't exist then perhaps their worldview would be shaken at the very foundation UwU.
Oh man could you imagine how cool your side of the conversation would be to me if you had actually read both of the images I posted so we can intelligently discuss this instead of you reading literally one line of the poster and getting upset because somebody on this hellforum called you out?
Just because the KKK has taken an anti-communist stance and I have posted anti-communist posts in the past proves nothing. Sorry man try harder. Their ideology is much more than just "anti-communism".
What are you even doing here? You did a drive-by post and now its, "uWu you compared my Klan talking point to Klan talking point how dare you good sir".
It's not even a clan talking point!!! Somehow you think anti-communism is pro Klan. Their anti-communism comes with a lot of other baggage as well. Anti-communism is only a Klan talking point if it is used in the context of race.
I think you got it backwards, in that, the issue got as far as it did because people like BLM also made it their issue.
We've had police killings like this for a good century in America and they rarely make a big stir. We are in the midst of the largest wave of civil unrest in American history. Plenty of police stations across the countries are finding themselves under heavy scrutiny, if not getting defunded outright. I'm not sure how you think they've gotten away with it.
I think you got it backwards, in that, the issue got as far as it did because people like BLM also made it their issue.
We've had police killings like this for a good century in America and they rarely make a big stir. We are in the midst of the largest wave of civil unrest in American history. Plenty of police stations across the countries are finding themselves under heavy scrutiny, if not getting defunded outright. I'm not sure how you think they've gotten away with it.
I sincerely hope it will lead to actual change - but I would be more hopeful if the spin wasn't "just one group suffers from this". If a potent majority could get sold on that talking point, you wouldn't have had Trump in the first place.
So communists must take real offense to the fact that the bourgeoise might not exist. Probably makes sense, after all their whole ideology is about combating this "common menace" if they found out it didn't exist then perhaps their worldview would be shaken at the very foundation UwU.
Just because the KKK has taken an anti-communist stance and I have posted anti-communist posts in the past proves nothing. Sorry man try harder. Their ideology is much more than just "anti-communism".
It's not even a clan talking point!!! Somehow you think anti-communism is pro Klan. Their anti-communism comes with a lot of other baggage as well. Anti-communism is only a Klan talking point if it is used in the context of race.
In a thread about Black liberation, your comment trods the same paths as the KKK trying to police and control Black people and Black political participation. Just cop it on the chin instead of complaining and spamming the thread.
In a thread about Black liberation, your comment trods the same paths as the KKK trying to police and control Black people and Black political participation. Just cop it on the chin instead of complaining and spamming the thread.
Have you considered that uninvited federales should violate everything you hold dear about "state's rights"?, but in an obvious indication of your true sentiments it does not seem to matter to you at all that unmarked, uninvited federales are kidnapping citizens.
While I do not defend the take itself, we have certainly gotten to a point where conspiracy theories are damaging society and now can be blamed for pretty extensive amount of unnecessary death. This is definitely a problem.
Yea but this is a very different thing. I'm not claiming any sort of collaborative or organizing principle here. Just that there is a class of capitalists whom have set out to hoard as much as possible while avoiding any part of the general social contract that they can to the detriment even of their own nations.
This is a farce. The protesters were just protesters by their own accounting. The right to protest was guaranteed to them by their right to freedom of speech. The federal agents retreated when invoked the right to an attorney, indicating their motivation would not hold up to legal scrutiny.
If you believe that the federal agent could be justified, it is in you to produce evidence linking mass detainment of seemingly random individuals who went to protests with specific crimes.
This is a farce. The protesters were just protesters by their own accounting. The right to protest was guaranteed to them by their right to freedom of speech. The federal agents retreated when invoked the right to an attorney, indicating their motivation would not hold up to legal scrutiny.
If you believe that the federal agent could be justified, it is in you to produce evidence linking mass detainment of seemingly random individuals who went to protests with specific crimes.
They've already admitted to some extent they are just there to intimidate. . .some federal official basically said they are already running off the vandals even without arresting anyone or something to that effect.
“Portland was totally out of control, and they went in, and I guess we have many people right now in jail, and we very much quelled it, and if it starts again, we’ll quell it again very easily,” Trump said Monday. “It’s not hard to do, if you know what you’re doing.”
Except as far as I understand there have been zero federal charges or federal arrests formally. . .so yea just unmarked federales kidnapping people in black clothes. . .because they are wearing black.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
