Get ready for the gas crunch this summer

GenMarshall

High Elven ISB Capt & Ghost Agent
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
44,224
Location
Night Haven, Vekta, United Systems of Korpulu
JAD MOUAWAD & DAVID LEONHARDT & THE NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE said:
Rising Oil Prices Finally Causing Economic Pinch
Consumers may have to start cutting back

Inflation surged last month, the government reported Tuesday, as the long rise in energy prices finally seemed to be pinching the American economy. After absorbing the burden of oil at $40 a barrel, then at $50 and beyond, consumers have started to react as prices have risen above $60 in recent weeks.

Wal-Mart blamed high oil prices on Tuesday as it reported that its profits had risen at their slowest rate in four years in the most recent quarter. The chief executive, Lee Scott, told investors that expensive oil was worrying him because it seemed to be erasing recent income gains for many customers.

Airlines have already felt the sting of increasing jet fuel costs. Last week, Delta Air Lines, UAL's United Airlines and Continental Airlines raised domestic fares in their latest attempt to stem losses. Delta is struggling to avoid bankruptcy. UPS recently reminded its drivers not to leave their truck engines running when they deliver packages.

Nearly all of the jump in inflation last month came from energy. Overall prices rose 0.5 percent in July — and 3.2 percent over the last year — after having been flat in June.

Across the country, families are trying to figure out where to cut corners so they can afford gas that now averages $2.55 a gallon nationwide after posting the biggest weekly jump in at least 15 years, according to the latest government statistics.

“We spend much less,” said Hollie Tubbs, a 32-year-old teacher's assistant in Brooklyn. Instead of going to the movies, watching plays or dining out, she now takes walks in the park with her husband and son and checks the newspaper to see when a nearby Barnes & Noble will be holding a free story hour. “Everything is related to gas prices. The more you drive, the more you spend. In order to bring the budget down, we stopped driving.”

If consumers are feeling hard-pressed by higher gasoline prices, matters could become worse this winter when their heating oil bill arrives. Some commodity analysts say that that is when the full impact of the higher energy costs will be felt.

Forecasters still expect economic growth to remain healthy for the rest of the year, as companies invest in new factories and the housing boom continues. But the high cost of oil already appears to be curbing growth, translating into unusually modest gains in employment and pay.

If history is any guide, higher prices will hurt consumption, curb the nation's output and shift spending patterns. The risks of a domino effect on the economy are real, economists say.

“We can't lose sight of the fact that energy restricts growth,” said Anthony Chan, a senior economist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. “It is doing so.”

So far, the economy has showed much more resilience to higher energy costs than most analysts had anticipated. Although prices began rising in early 2002, consumers have kept shopping, companies have expanded and inflation has remained under control. At times, it seemed the country had entered a new economic era.

Without question, economists say, rising oil prices cause less economic pain than they once did. It takes half as much energy to produce $1 of gross domestic product today, adjusted for inflation, than it did 30 years ago. Even at today's prices, oil remains cheaper today than it did in the early 1980s, once adjusted for inflation.

The falling cost of other goods, thanks in large part to global competition, has also helped cushion the blow from higher energy costs. While energy prices rose 3.8 percent between June and July, the price of all other goods inched up only 0.2 percent, the Labor Department said Tuesday.

“There seems to be a greater tolerance in the economy in terms of what can be withstood,” said Doug Leggate, an energy analyst with Citigroup in New York.

But a spike in oil prices still hurts, economists say, even if the pain does not come immediately. In the past, its full effect has not come until a year, or even two years, after prices began rising. Both of the last two recessions — in 1990-91 and in 2001 — began more than a year after energy prices started a sharp climb.

“It is way too soon to be sanguine,” said Andrew J. Oswald, an economist at the University of Warwick in England, who has written about oil. “The influence of a petroleum shock runs deep and runs slow. My own view is that we will find oil shocks still hurt, and hurt fundamentally.”

It was only 13 months ago that the price of a barrel of crude settled above $40. Oil, which closed Tuesday at $66.08 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, is not likely to become much cheaper anytime soon, analysts say. Nor are natural gas prices, which have gained 73 percent this year. This means that winter heating bills for American households are set to soar.

“Higher gasoline prices and heating oil bills are like consumption taxes,” said Bob Gillon, a senior analyst with John S. Herold Inc. “They will be a hardship on many. People will cut back on some purchases.”

The blow has been softened in recent years by falling long-term interest rates, which have allowed homeowners to refinance their mortgages and cut their monthly payments, and by rising house values.

“You don't have to take a couple hundred bucks and stick it in the bank each month because your home price is going up,” said Lakshman R. Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute in New York. “You might even withdraw some money.”

Despite some scattered signs of a slowdown, like Wal-Mart's announcement on Tuesday, consumer spending has continued to increase. Home Depot and J.C. Penney both reported Tuesday that their profits had risen in the most recent quarter.

But the portion of income that Americans save each month, on average, has now fallen to zero, according to the government. That leaves families with scant cushion; if the savings rate were higher, people could cover rising energy costs by cutting back on the amount of money they set aside.

Most workers have received only a tiny raise in their hourly pay since 2001, according to inflation-adjusted figures from the Labor Department.

“Consumers have held up the economy,” Oswald, the economist, said. “But, of course, that kind of behavior cannot be sustained in the long run. Eventually, reality dawns, and high energy prices come back to bite you.”

The biggest reason to think that the economy could avoid another downturn is that today's high prices are to a large extent a by-product of robust economic growth. During previous oil shocks — in 1973 and from 1979 to 1981 — prices rose because supplies were cut off. Today's surge in oil prices is the result of demand from consumers in the United States and China, leading to a sustained rally that began sometime at the end of 2003.

So, high prices may be able to do only so much damage to economic growth, some economists say. If the economy starts to stall, energy prices will probably come down, too.

Among the worst-hit by the high oil prices are airlines, whose woes over the past few years have been accelerated by the oil rally. With fuel bills expected to reach $83 billion this year, a 36 percent jump from last year, airlines are finding it increasingly difficult to hedge against higher prices. This year, their losses are expected to reach $6 billion, up from last year's $4.2 billion in losses, according to the International Air Transportation Association.

UPS, which operates the world's ninth-largest airline, as well as a fleet of 88,000 trucks, has seen its energy bill soar 45 percent in the second quarter this year, after a 30 percent jump in the first quarter and a 35 percent increase in 2004 compared with 2003.

“Oil prices have risen more suddenly than we had anticipated,” said Susan Rosenberg, a UPS spokeswoman.

Beside asking drivers not to leave their truck engines running when delivering packages, the company is counting on new technology to help its drivers determine the best delivery routes, saving an anticipated 14 million gallons of fuel. It has also passed on some of the added energy costs as a fuel surcharge.

The effect of higher prices has had an uneven impact on companies. “It's a mixed bag,” said Neil Elliott, a director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit research organization. The industries most affected “tend to be a slow or declining part of the American manufacturing base.”

Some companies have simply shut down factories or moved them to countries where energy and other costs are less expensive.

Dow Chemical, for example, has closed dozens of plants in the United States, including two major ones in 2002 and 2003, as natural gas prices started to soar. Last year, the run-up in energy prices cost the company an extra $3.4 billion.

“We can pass on some of the costs, and we have, and we try as hard as we can,” said Gordon Slack, the director for the company's energy policy. At the same time, it has planned expansions in Kuwait and investments in Oman, where natural gas is cheaper.

Instead of passing on the costs, carmakers have slashed prices to attract buyers. For much of the year, sales of gas-thirsty sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks have declined. Then in July, the first month all three American automakers offered their employee-discount promotions, sales shot up dramatically. Some industry experts said the discounts allowed consumers to shrug off the high gas prices.

“That $30,000 SUV became $27,000 or $26,000,” said Walter McManus, a scientist at the University of Michigan's Transportation Research Institute. Consumers, he said, are willing to overlook the extra money they will have to spend on fuel because they believe it is offset thanks to the deep discount.

In the end, much will depend on consumers.

“It wasn't nearly as bad” last year, said Tina M. Leshowitz, a 42-year-old bookkeeper from Lodi, N.J. She said that she expected energy prices to keep rising through the winter and that she would probably have to cancel her planned Christmas trip because of rising ticket prices.

“It's out of control now. I've got to cut back on everything.”

Until now, consumers have not made good on such threats. But executives at the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart, and some economists say that more families might be starting to do so.

Source

Be prepared for the hike in gas prices :eek: (I had to put that in there because of the XCL :p )
 
Somehow I'm not really worried.
 
Oil prices are not the biggest concern. People's reactions to them are!

Humans have a nasty tendency of trying to fix things, and in the process, make them worse. Loss of consumer confidence would; reduce high street sales, slow down economic growth, and generally compound the problems.

It is easy for one person to carry on and ignore oil prices, but what will everyone else be doing? :confused:
 
So you complain about gas prices in the U.S., don't you? Other nations spend WAY more than the Americans for gas.
 
Damnyankee said:
Those countries also have socialist economies, and benifit in different ways then Americans.


We are talking about every country EXCEPT America.
 
Japanrocks12 said:
We are talking about every country EXCEPT America.

No, not every country. I lived in the Middle East for two years. It was quite cheap comparatively everyplace I went.

Also, most of Europe has VERY high gas taxes that cause the high prices, does not have the urban sprawl the US has, and has excellent public transportation comparatively.
 
yeah, its a bummer. good thing im moving to DC tomorrow...Its Public Transport and walking for me! I wont be driving much for at least a year
 
I love the high prices! Just watching those idiots with vehicles so much larger than they need fork out that much more money to keep their egos on the road.

I do feel bad for farmers and others who have an economic reason to own them though.
 
Japanrocks12 said:
So you complain about gas prices in the U.S., don't you? Other nations spend WAY more than the Americans for gas.
I think you are missing the point: we, outside the USA, have alternative means of transport.

Spoiler London(comparison) :

London built up around the rail networks, not the other way around. I am in the south at the moment: there are two train stations within 5 minute walk, then another 2 stations within 15 minute walk, and 2 tube stations about 20 to 30 minutes away (all in opposite directions) and the trains run every ten minutes or so - but I am near the centre and maybe that improves perspective. My emphasis is: who needs to buy petrol when it is so easy to jump on a train?


Spoiler EU(comparison) :
Perhaps Paris is similar to London, but other European cities I know (in the UK & NL) are slightly less efficient. It was common to wait 30 minutes for some connections on public transport.


Spoiler US(comparison) :
When I was in the USA, there was no public trains/buses at all. Taxi was the closest thing available but they took about 60 minutes to get to where I lived. The nearest cities were Palm City & West Palm Beach. When visiting them, there was no obvious sign of public transport. Hollywood shows little, but Americans have insisted that trolleys (British English: tram) are common in New England.


My overall impression is that the USA has very little public transport compared to Europe, is therefore more dependent on private cars, and thus heavily dependent on private purchases of fuel - there is no easy way for them to avoid that!
 
sysyphus said:
I love the high prices! Just watching those idiots with vehicles so much larger than they need fork out that much more money to keep their egos on the road.

I do feel bad for farmers and others who have an economic reason to own them though.
Oh yeah, that too :p

Will the Bush administration offer assistance to farmers?
 
Fetus4188 said:
Somehow I'm not really worried.

Me neither

Bush's new energy bill will take care of it.
:D
 
FriendlyFire said:
Me neither

Bush's new energy bill will take care of it.
:D
Some how, I doubt Bush would fix anything since things fall apart to things he touches.
 
stormbind said:
I think you are missing the point: we, outside the USA, have alternative means of transport.

Spoiler London(comparison) :

London built up around the rail networks, not the other way around. I am in the south at the moment: there are two train stations within 5 minute walk, then another 2 stations within 15 minute walk, and 2 tube stations about 20 to 30 minutes away (all in opposite directions) and the trains run every ten minutes or so - but I am near the centre and maybe that improves perspective. My emphasis is: who needs to buy petrol when it is so easy to jump on a train?


Spoiler EU(comparison) :
Perhaps Paris is similar to London, but other European cities I know (in the UK & NL) are slightly less efficient. It was common to wait 30 minutes for some connections on public transport.


Spoiler US(comparison) :
When I was in the USA, there was no public trains/buses at all. Taxi was the closest thing available but they took about 60 minutes to get to where I lived. The nearest cities were Palm City & West Palm Beach. When visiting them, there was no obvious sign of public transport. Hollywood shows little, but Americans have insisted that trolleys (British English: tram) are common in New England.


My overall impression is that the USA has very little public transport compared to Europe, is therefore more dependent on private cars, and thus heavily dependent on private purchases of fuel - there is no easy way for them to avoid that!



Well, the people of Florida were only somewhat correct - there is some public transportation in the Northeast, moreso at least than elsewhere. This is primarily because the northeastern cities are older and more akin to European cities with tangles of almost unnavigable, narrow streets. This has caused cities like Washington, Boston and New York to develop reliable public transportation systems - but leave the cities for the suburbs, or even for the smaller cities like Providence, New Haven and Trenton and you won't find any public transportation at all.
 
stormbind said:
I think you are missing the point: we, outside the USA, have alternative means of transport.
Spoiler US(comparison) :
When I was in the USA, there was no public trains/buses at all. Taxi was the closest thing available but they took about 60 minutes to get to where I lived. The nearest cities were Palm City & West Palm Beach. When visiting them, there was no obvious sign of public transport. Hollywood shows little, but Americans have insisted that trolleys (British English: tram) are common in New England.


My overall impression is that the USA has very little public transport compared to Europe, is therefore more dependent on private cars, and thus heavily dependent on private purchases of fuel - there is no easy way for them to avoid that!

that's because you can't compare the big metropolis of London, with some rank-and-file like Palm City. Chicago, New York and L.A. all have extensive public transist. And because Europe has a higher density, your more likely to live in either a city or a small town. but the bulk of the US lives in suburbs, where public transist (aside from buses) is highly impractical
 
sysyphus said:
I love the high prices! Just watching those idiots with vehicles so much larger than they need fork out that much more money to keep their egos on the road.

I do feel bad for farmers and others who have an economic reason to own them though.

I was reading somewhere that 80% of SUVs in the Toronto area are exclusively used by only the driver.
 
my only hope is that the gas hike brings about more efficient and enviromental innovations for vehicles/heating/cooling systems since it's obvious gas won't be getting any cheaper.
 
Top Bottom