"I find it curious" that you think them merely posting a paragraph, which wasn't quote mined like yours were, and a chart (
both from your own source!) must somehow transform them into some sort of "alarmist claim".
My source was the IPCC AR5.
Your source was a "denier" blog.
You should try reading the entire report, instead of "cherry picking" the sentences which support these "alarmist" views.
The AR5 report actually comes out saying climate change is not occurring as the models predict, and play down the drama caused by the previous AR4 report.
The "Summary for Policy Makers" however, plays up the drama and provides "sound bites" to promote alarmist views.
Again, from that
chart from your very own source, which is readily available from numerous other sources such as
this one:
Again, my source was the IPCC AR5 report.
Your source is a "denier" blog.
Warmer and/or fewer cold days and nights over most land areas: very likely
Warmer and/or more frequent hot days and nights over most land areas: very likely
Warm spells/heat waves: likely
Heavy precipitation events: likely over most land areas
Increase in intensity and/or duration of drought: likely in most regions since 1970
Increase in intense cyclone activity: likely in some regions since 1970
Increased incidence and/or magnitude of extreme high sea level: likely
Notice how he again ignored the evidence that many forms of extreme weather are indeed likely increasing. That AGW was indeed "likely" or "more likely than not" a factor with all the enumerated classes of extreme weather, and that it is "virtually certain" at least some of these forms of extreme weather will continue to increase in the future.
Do you actually realise these claims are based on computer models?
Observations, as I posted above, show there is no discernible trend in extreme weather.
Your doing science wrong Form. You're doing the typical alarmist "models differ from observations, so the observations are wrong". That's anti-science.
----------------------------------
EDIT:
Also looking at your table, nearly all of them are NOT extreme weather events. Of the ones you list only heat waves, drought and tropical cyclones are extreme weather events.
You also misled everyone here and "upped" the confidence levels of all three!
From the chart:
Heat waves: Form says "likely", the TRUTH says
medium confidence
Drought: Form says "likely", the TRUTH says
low confidence
Tropical cyclones: Form says "likely", the TRUTH says
low confidence
The chart does not list tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, storms and many other extreme weather events.
