"Teachers need to make the money that they need to make," [Alabama state Sen. Shadrack] McGill said, according to the Times-Journal. "If you double a teacher's pay scale, you'll attract people who aren't called to teach ... and these teachers that are called to teach, regardless of the pay scale, they would teach. It's just in them to do. It's the ability that God give 'em."'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/shadrack-mcgill-alabama-teacher-pay-bible_n_1247765.html
Is he suggesting that we perform jobs to our ability, and get paid what we need?
That we each perform to our ability, and to each of us what we need?
Now, I do what I do out of love for my work. It's no longer the money that motivates me, but I can only do this work because I am wealthy enough to do so.
Is it a good idea to intentionally restrict wages, so we only get people who want to do that work, instead of getting people who would work for money? We seem to already do that with pastors. And a charity that has a highly paid CEO sometimes gets mocked. But, if we want to get Goldman Sachs run by people who just want to sell money services, does that principle work too?