Akka
Moody old mage.
I'm shocked to see the Nordic countries being so high here.
The UK is actually third-lowest, but yes wasn't expecting them to be this low. If anything I would have expected them and Sweden to swap coloursThere must be some accounting trick to make the UK lowest, surely? We do have all the accountants.
Is it related to technology? Politics?Because of the specificity of what's being shown here, and because I don't completely trust the data, I'm going to accept a "close enough" answer for this one.
As you can see, I've left the legend there. A country either has this or it doesn't. I don't need the name of the actual thing, just the category will do.
View attachment 684949
I'm shocked to see the Nordic countries being so high here.
Suspect this is largely a map of how much housing is treated as a wealth generating commodity for the top 20 or 30 percent of households. That is, my suspicion is countries that don't do that so much have more concentrated 1% wealth, because wealth for the broader top 20% or 30% population isn't ballooned by high house prices. UK being the lowest would then be because of really overpriced housing and higher concentrations would be places where those folk don't own expensive houses.There must be some accounting trick to make the UK lowest, surely? We do have all the accountants.
I'm shocked to see the Nordic countries being so high here.
I'm guessing the "have it or they don't" refers to some sort of legal right or prohibition? It's gotta be something pretty binary and on/off.
on the right track but too specific for me to give it to youCFCs?
Close enough!Leaded petrol?