Lexicus
Deity
Complaining about the size of the debt is a good way to solve no problems ever
Complaining about the size of the debt is a good way to solve no problems ever
The size of the debt could be a problem left unchecked.Complaining about the size of the debt is a good way to solve no problems ever
The size of the debt could be a problem left unchecked.
The size of the debt could be a problem left unchecked.
I guess it depends on the sincerity of the takeaway, eh? How serious was the article? Assclown and all. The likes of the sentiment can include themselves to whatever degree of sincerity intended.
Happy enough with that.
The size of the debt could be a problem left unchecked.
I've heard it compared to grabbing onto a rope attached to a rising balloon. After so many feet, it doesn't matter how much space is between you and the ground, it's going be lethal fall regardless.
meh, now its a meh.
The only country on the planet that puts its flaws and faults on a microphone instead of fixing them?We are the only country on the planet that airs our dirty laundry and puts our own flaws and faults on a microphone for the world to see and judge.
only country on the planet that puts its flaws and faults on a microphone instead of fixing them?
For example take a look at how bad state european militaries are in, which is maybe only justifed because Russia is in a similar bad shape. US have problems, but everyone have problems and US still generally make it to top 1/3 of the countries and in many ways into the top 10.Name one country that has truly fixed any of its problems. You can't because no such country exists. This is evidenced by the fact that if you look back, say, 50 years in any country's history, you'll see that people were generally complaining about the same problems back then that they complain about now.
The point being that governments have largely proven themselves to be unable to truly fix problems. The best they can do is apply temporary band-aids to make the problems seem not as bad for a decade or so.
That is the case pretty much everywhere in the world.The poor and lower classes get hit the hardest. Sure, there's probably lots of middle class and upper class investors losing money, but those who are actually suffering because of this are all those people out of jobs who can't pay rent and are facing eviction or whatever. That lower class of America has always been disadvantaged and "able" to take some punishment before all hell breaks loose.
That is the case pretty much everywhere in the world.
Compared to other "western" countries, yes that is likely correct. Compared to all countries in the world, no I suspect US have better social protection than the average country. I suspect western world is basically the odd case of decent social protection and once you go past it the average country don't offer much social protection.Sure, but America has very poor socioeconomic mobility when compared to other western countries. The social safety net is almost non-existent as well. A crisis like this will hit the poorest parts of America first and foremost. This is true for other countries as well, but in other western countries those lower echelons of society have more support and access to a safety net.
Compared to other "western" countries, yes that is likely correct. Compared to all countries in the world, no I suspect US have better social protection than the average country. .
It probably comes downs to priorities. US seems to do better in stuff like science and military because they invest alot in those areas, which could otherwise have gone to social security. There are also differences in how US government system is setup compared to other western nations which also probably influence which areas are prioritised.Well yes, if you compare the U.S. to the developing world then the American social safety net and access to things like education and healthcare are not so bad.
It makes far more sense to compare the U.S. to other western nations in this case though.
It probably comes downs to priorities. US seems to do better in stuff like science and military because they invest alot in those areas, which could otherwise have gone to social security. There are also differences in how US government system is setup compared to other western nations which also probably influence which areas are prioritised.
makes far more sense to compare the U.S. to other western nations in this case though