How many realms of existence/universes/simulations are there?

Narz

keeping it real
Joined
Jun 1, 2002
Messages
31,514
Location
Haverhill, UK
The god thread got me thinking, assuming one believes in god/gods, is this the best he's got? Or is this a version of hell?

I mean there's a lot of flaws with this reality. The fact that half of life has to hunt down, maim, slaughter & consume the other half, the fact that pleasure cannot go beyond a certain point & we quickly adapt to our comforts & even joys and of course the inevitable decay and death of everyone we know & love (including us).

The human mind can conjure up many visions of utopia. Even if we couldn't defeat death eventually humans may be able to so alter our own brains that our greatest joy in this lifetime will be below the baseline emotional state of our descendants (assume we manage to maintain Earth as a suitable home for human civilization). Without all the stress, drama & nonsense the fearful human mind conjures up we could probably achieve much more.

If there is a designer (of which I'm doubtful and especially doubtful that if there is that he's the big boss & not an alien teenager doing a science project) I don't think he's playing us like a game, more seems like we're an experiment left to run it's course. Human beings will either rise to better ourselves in ways the guy/gal who started the sim running could not have anticipated & ourselves become gods or we will self-destruct.

It's an interesting time to be alive for sure, it seems like by mid-century we should be able to tell which wall things will shake out. I actually used to be more of a pessimist (like 90% sure we're screwed) now I'm thinking we have maybe a 30% chance. Don't ask me why, I have no data to back up my hunch.

Anyway, I think the HIndus have different realms, hell, then hungry ghosts, then this one & a few levels of heaven (is that where 7th heaven comes from?).

To me heaven would be in charge of the game, able to design infinite universes forever & insert yourself into any character in any universe, to create & change laws & try to design the perfect utopia (I guess you could design hell-realms but without scarcity I see no reason why anyone would be cruel or morbid). I see zero evidence that this universe (or at least being a mammal on this Earth) was designed for the comfort of sentient beings. All humans have accomplished it's been our own hard work (and with many negative consequences, perhaps even the seeds of our own eventual extinction) and still, our hard work has had puny results, living a few decades longer, more creature comforts & ability to move ourselves about, but still the underlying suffering of life remains & we're here but for a blink of an eye cosmically, after which we are never to be heard from again. But who knows, perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps when we expire we wake up in the next level of reality or to the "true reality". It's certainly a better thought than non-existence. As crummy as life can be I've gotten rather used to it & the thought of not being is... well, terror.
 
The god thread got me thinking, assuming one believes in god/gods, is this the best he's got? Or is this a version of hell?

I mean there's a lot of flaws with this reality. The fact that half of life has to hunt down, maim, slaughter & consume the other half, the fact that pleasure cannot go beyond a certain point & we quickly adapt to our comforts & even joys and of course the inevitable decay and death of everyone we know & love (including us).

The human mind can conjure up many visions of utopia. Even if we couldn't defeat death eventually humans may be able to so alter our own brains that our greatest joy in this lifetime will be below the baseline emotional state of our descendants (assume we manage to maintain Earth as a suitable home for human civilization). Without all the stress, drama & nonsense the fearful human mind conjures up we could probably achieve much more.

If there is a designer (of which I'm doubtful and especially doubtful that if there is that he's the big boss & not an alien teenager doing a science project) I don't think he's playing us like a game, more seems like we're an experiment left to run it's course. Human beings will either rise to better ourselves in ways the guy/gal who started the sim running could not have anticipated & ourselves become gods or we will self-destruct.

It's an interesting time to be alive for sure, it seems like by mid-century we should be able to tell which wall things will shake out. I actually used to be more of a pessimist (like 90% sure we're screwed) now I'm thinking we have maybe a 30% chance. Don't ask me why, I have no data to back up my hunch.

Anyway, I think the HIndus have different realms, hell, then hungry ghosts, then this one & a few levels of heaven (is that where 7th heaven comes from?).

To me heaven would be in charge of the game, able to design infinite universes forever & insert yourself into any character in any universe, to create & change laws & try to design the perfect utopia (I guess you could design hell-realms but without scarcity I see no reason why anyone would be cruel or morbid). I see zero evidence that this universe (or at least being a mammal on this Earth) was designed for the comfort of sentient beings. All humans have accomplished it's been our own hard work (and with many negative consequences, perhaps even the seeds of our own eventual extinction) and still, our hard work has had puny results, living a few decades longer, more creature comforts & ability to move ourselves about, but still the underlying suffering of life remains & we're here but for a blink of an eye cosmically, after which we are never to be heard from again. But who knows, perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps when we expire we wake up in the next level of reality or to the "true reality". It's certainly a better thought than non-existence. As crummy as life can be I've gotten rather used to it & the thought of not being is... well, terror.

I'm somewhat wondering if you expect that someone posting on these forums will be capable, knowledgeable, or aware enough to accurately answer your question, or is it purely rhetorical and philosophical? :P
 
I'm somewhat wondering if you expect that someone posting on these forums will be capable, knowledgeable, or aware enough to accurately answer your question, or is it purely rhetorical and philosophical? :p
It's just for entertainment purposes. Maybe someone will inspire someone else to write a cool sci-fi book based on this thread.

I find it weird that people still believe a bunch of nonsense made up 2,000 years ago (based on a hodgepodge of other myths from their times). Why not make up some cooler stuff to believe right now? People's favorite music changes & The NY Times Bestsellers list turns over but people's beliefs about the fundamental nature of reality... "yeah I think those dehydrated sheep herders in the desert pretty much figured it out back in the day".
 
In the Culture series, sometimes simulations are run to predict future history. And these simulations are run with such fidelity that the residents of the simulation actually have consciousness

God is described as knowing all things, and so knows every possible outcome. In some ways, God has run a simulation of all possible universes. Does this mean that all universes that God knows about actually exist?

Also, the solipsistic idea that you're the only person in the universe is consistent with the idea that God can imagine all universes. Also, it solves the problem of evil. No innocent dogs were actually run over in the creation of your childhood.

My own personal opinion is that the Universe could very well be infinite in size, and be actualized in ways that don't make sense from our perspective. That said, our local Universe looks to be finite in time. So, while there be might be infinite copies of me elsewhere, I should be unique from all practical viewpoints
 
The god thread got me thinking, assuming one believes in god/gods, is this the best he's got? Or is this a version of hell?
We are the beetles.
Spoiler :
NSFW language warning around 4:14
Spoiler :

I mean there's a lot of flaws with this reality. The fact that half of life has to hunt down, maim, slaughter & consume the other half, the fact that pleasure cannot go beyond a certain point & we quickly adapt to our comforts & even joys and of course the inevitable decay and death of everyone we know & love (including us).

Everyone has mouths and teeth.
Of course it was going be brutal.

Death is proof that something was alive, and every living thing gets to experience it.
Except for that one jellyfish thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_immortality

The human mind can conjure up many visions of utopia. Even if we couldn't defeat death eventually humans may be able to so alter our own brains that our greatest joy in this lifetime will be below the baseline emotional state of our descendants (assume we manage to maintain Earth as a suitable home for human civilization). Without all the stress, drama & nonsense the fearful human mind conjures up we could probably achieve much more.

Haha, implantable pleasure wire straight into the brain.

I think the aliens had them in Battlefield Earth.

Known space universe had a more well known user.
In Larry Niven's Known Space stories, a wirehead is someone who has been fitted with an electronic brain implant (called a "droud" in the stories) to stimulate the pleasure centres of their brain. In the Known Space universe, wireheading is the most addictive habit known (Louis Wu is the only given example of a recovered addict), and wireheads usually die from neglecting themselves in favour of the ceaseless pleasure. Wireheading is so powerful and easy that it becomes an evolutionary pressure, selecting against that portion of Known Space humanity without self-control.



If there is a designer (of which I'm doubtful and especially doubtful that if there is that he's the big boss & not an alien teenager doing a science project) I don't think he's playing us like a game, more seems like we're an experiment left to run it's course. Human beings will either rise to better ourselves in ways the guy/gal who started the sim running could not have anticipated & ourselves become gods or we will self-destruct.

It's an interesting time to be alive for sure, it seems like by mid-century we should be able to tell which wall things will shake out. I actually used to be more of a pessimist (like 90% sure we're screwed) now I'm thinking we have maybe a 30% chance. Don't ask me why, I have no data to back up my hunch.

A famous math guy has given humanity 760 years - 50% chance of extinction.
He called the Berlin Wall coming down correctly I think.
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2...rgument-calculation-prediction-j-richard-gott

Anyway, I think the HIndus have different realms, hell, then hungry ghosts, then this one & a few levels of heaven (is that where 7th heaven comes from?).

To me heaven would be in charge of the game, able to design infinite universes forever & insert yourself into any character in any universe, to create & change laws & try to design the perfect utopia (I guess you could design hell-realms but without scarcity I see no reason why anyone would be cruel or morbid). I see zero evidence that this universe (or at least being a mammal on this Earth) was designed for the comfort of sentient beings. All humans have accomplished it's been our own hard work (and with many negative consequences, perhaps even the seeds of our own eventual extinction) and still, our hard work has had puny results, living a few decades longer, more creature comforts & ability to move ourselves about, but still the underlying suffering of life remains & we're here but for a blink of an eye cosmically, after which we are never to be heard from again. But who knows, perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps when we expire we wake up in the next level of reality or to the "true reality". It's certainly a better thought than non-existence. As crummy as life can be I've gotten rather used to it & the thought of not being is... well, terror.

The sun is literally too bright. (G-type star)
Would be better if it was a dimmer k-type star, with much less UV and longer lifespan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitability_of_K-type_main-sequence_star_systems
 
The god thread got me thinking, assuming one believes in god/gods, is this the best he's got? Or is this a version of hell?

I mean there's a lot of flaws with this reality. The fact that half of life has to hunt down, maim, slaughter & consume the other half, the fact that pleasure cannot go beyond a certain point & we quickly adapt to our comforts & even joys and of course the inevitable decay and death of everyone we know & love (including us).
The only flaws in reality are those which the critters capable of conjuring have conjured up. As critical thinking creatures, humans are pretty critical of things and it is easy for us to find things that are not to our liking. That is just us talking.

If you make assumptions about design, creation, purpose, no purpose, god, gods, right and wrong, then you can complain in the context of those assumptions. If you change those assumptions, the nature of one's complains will likely change. The human perspective is a very limited and self centered one so we have lots to complain about. If you set aside that human perspective are there a set of assumptions that make the world perfect? Could those assumptions include some notion of god? What might that notion of god be like? Would there be any benefits to such an intellectual
construct and would those benefits be better ones that the typical way we view reality?
 
God is described as knowing all things, and so knows every possible outcome. In some ways, God has run a simulation of all possible universes. Does this mean that all universes that God knows about actually exist?

Only if you subscribe to something like Egan's Dust Theory (which Egan himself does not believe in) or some kind of informational monism, in which case God doesn't exist or would be pointless.

Also, the solipsistic idea that you're the only person in the universe is consistent with the idea that God can imagine all universes. Also, it solves the problem of evil. No innocent dogs were actually run over in the creation of your childhood.

That's not remotely true (you also suffer in seemingly needless ways, after all), and also doesn't work even if you are the only one in *that* universe - if I understand you right, there would be other universes with their own observers, so it's basically the same situation of multiple people suffering.
 
one . This Multiverse thing can easily be converted into justification for sin and whatnot , because if there are 10 million other universes and 10 millions of you , 5 million and one of you might be living in a place where the cultural norms might expect you to eat the babies of your neighbours and stuff .
 
unpopular opinion: multiverse is not a theory, but a fantasy for people so in love with life as a concept they can't get over the idea of a possible life or possible world somehow not existing somewhere. when (human) life is deemed the most worthwhilhe thing there is then this is the logical coping mechanism.
 
You may be right. I've never understood the attraction, myself.
 
What a fantastically uncharitable pov.

depends on your reaction, no? I mean at least the implication is that the earth is pretty unique, as are all humans, and that coincidence plays a big role in our existance. whether or not you see those as positive is pretty subjective.

one . This Multiverse thing can easily be converted into justification for sin and whatnot , because if there are 10 million other universes and 10 millions of you , 5 million and one of you might be living in a place where the cultural norms might expect you to eat the babies of your neighbours and stuff .

that's not really justification for sin, it's moral relativism. and we didn't even need the multiverse theory to come up with it, that is what french people are for!
 
That's not remotely true (you also suffer in seemingly needless ways, after all), and also doesn't work even if you are the only one in *that* universe - if I understand you right, there would be other universes with their own observers, so it's basically the same situation of multiple people suffering.

Your own suffering is your own fault, and you're supposed to have faith enough to realize that. The problem of evil kicks in when there is undeserved suffering. This is why the Christians go back to the idea of original sin, and so many Christians are creationists. They can't imagine why fawns are dying in forest fires before Adam and Eve sinned, so they just declare that it didn't happen before Original Sin.

One of the solutions to the question "why is there undeserved suffering?" is "there isn't". And then you can craft Theory to state that "all suffering is deserved". You can also say "there is no suffering"

This is a separate idea to my first contribution, that God knows all possibilities
 
Your own suffering is your own fault, and you're supposed to have faith enough to realize that.

I think quite a few people on here would have something to say about that.

Anyway, if you aren't really hurting anyone, then why does God command us to be kind and charitable? Why are these important ethics for a lone being? Love itself has no purpose in a solipsistic universe, except for love of God - and according to him that is bound up in love for one's neighbor. Is it all a training program for when you get to meet real people in the afterlife or something?

This is why the Christians go back to the idea of original sin, and so many Christians are creationists. They can't imagine why fawns are dying in forest fires before Adam and Eve sinned, so they just declare that it didn't happen before Original Sin.

I think you have far less insight into their thinking than you believe.

One of the solutions to the question "why is there undeserved suffering?" is "there isn't". And then you can craft Theory to state that "all suffering is deserved". You can also say "there is no suffering"

You might enjoy this (although the concept is obviously ridiculous within a theistic worldview).
 
Last edited:
Anyway, if you aren't really hurting anyone, then why does God command us to be kind and charitable?

Obedience. Or something. Also, you're assuming that God commanded you to charity, instead of putting you in a world where it's your decision if you should.
I didn't say it answered why we (or, I guess, I) was created. I just said that it is a solution for the problem of evil.



We already know that God is okay with us being confused about the nature of reality. For those that believe life is some type of sorting game, it's more a question of what we're confused about.

But no, I know YEC theology. I come from that world. There are other communities that believe different things, obviously
 
Back
Top Bottom