MobBoss
Off-Topic Overlord
You're so adorable when you lie.![]()
Heh, not half as adorable as you are when you do.

You're so adorable when you lie.![]()
Lotsa words. No actual thought.Yeah, I don't have any tremendous problem with that. My point is that this isn't a category of behaviour unique to statists. You and those like you fall quite squarely into the category of thieving control-freaks, and in practice altogether more so than most "statists" do; you've just convinced yourself that your particular form of totalitarianism is somehow "free" because it lacks the formal institution of state
Perhaps if their project "contains certain contradictions," this might imply that it's wrong. Maybe? My project does not have any contradictions. Freedom is right. Slavery is wrong. Period. And those who advocate slavery are evil. Yes, I know that this is simple. Truth normally is.which is altogether more infantile than the left-liberals who are at least willing to admit that their project contains certain contradictions.
More bad jokes. They still ain't funny.I have you pegged for one of those statists using public roads.
40% of the respondants are in the 90th percentile of forum users? I'm surprised it's not higher.
It's interesting how in this day people will willingly concede that they are physically inept or unattractive or obnoxious ("politically incorrect" is the usual euphemism for that) but when it comes to intellect they're always magically above the rabble.
More dumbassery. I'm looking out my window right now. And there it is. The road beside my house. Run by state thieves for the purpose of state theft.I bet that often when you use them, you have the choice not to.
40% of the respondants are in the 90th percentile of forum users? I'm surprised it's not higher.
It's interesting how in this day people will willingly concede that they are physically inept or unattractive or obnoxious ("politically incorrect" is the usual euphemism for that) but when it comes to intellect they're always magically above the rabble.
Of course, I'm the cutest too.Heh, not half as adorable as you are when you do.![]()
@JR
As far as I have seen, your entire history has been about dull bad jokes defending worthless people bossing decent folk around.
Lotsa words. No actual thought.
"Freedom" defined purely in negative terms, as the absence of active oppression rather than the concrete potential to act, is, put blunty, a big load of bollocks. Left liberals and social democrats understand this, which is why they, in the generally sincere pursuit of generalised freedom, are willing to accept certain oppressions if they believe that they will produce greater positive freedoms. I don't agree with them on this, but I understand that the logic amounts to something more than "slavery, woo". You, on the other hand, seem to believe that we can knock over the state and then we will have Total Freedom Forever, as if the only limit to people's positive freedoms was taxes, or, for that matter, if the only limit to people's negative freedoms was the state. It's painfully obvious to even the most politically informed that neither of these are the case are the case, so while the lefties come out of this exchange looking compromised and a tad greasy, you come out of it looking like a child.Perhaps if their project "contains certain contradictions," this might imply that it's wrong. Maybe? My project does not have any contradictions. Freedom is right. Slavery is wrong. Period. And those who advocate slavery are evil. Yes, I know that this is simple. Truth normally is.