I wish to have multiple wives.

CivGeneral said:
I see polygamy (having multiple wives) is wrong in the western hemisphere. I beleve on religious and traditional grounds that there should only be one man and one woman to be in a marrage.
And I believe it's not wrong.

For personal reasons, I see polygamy is a selfish relationship because you have all of the women (especialy if you have big muscles) while the average guy gets nothing and would suffer a women shortage.
It's only selfish if you refuse to let your partners have other partners in turn. Even then, it wouldn't lead to a shortage of women, if there were also other women with multiple husbands.

I don't know what the OP of this thread meant, but what I talk about is multiple relationships where all partners are free to have multiple relationships (ie, many-to-many, not one-to-many, and certainly not always man-to-many-women).
 
I'm in two minds about polygamy. On the one hand, who am I to tell you you can't love more than one woman... but then again, if i were one of many wives [or even girlfriends] I'd be miserable all the time wondering why I wasn't good enough! I don't think its very emotionally healthy.
 
Polygamy defeats the purpose of marriage. Sexual relations should ONLY occur between two people in a committed, long-term (ideally unless one dies but at least decades), MONOGAMOUS relationship. Sexual relations in a short-term relationship, or in multiple simultaneous relationships, is a foul abomination :nono: .

Some people argue that it is not human nature to mate for life; THIS is why society was forced to create the institution of marriage. If it were human nature to mate for life, marriage would not be needed.

James Madison said:
If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
 
feline_dacat said:
if i were one of many wives [or even girlfriends] I'd be miserable all the time wondering why I wasn't good enough! I don't think its very emotionally healthy.

Well, I support it if it work both ways(many-to-many), so there's nothing stopping a women to get multiple partner.

But anyway, this thread make me realize why at times I just wish to end up single,i.e. not content with only one girlfriends/wives, too much trouble keeping many of them :cry:
 
I forsee millions of currency notes via dowries and millions of deaths via dowry deaths...
 
I see polygamy as an objectifiction of people. I don't think anyone could be in love with 4 people.

Besides if polygamy were legal what would be the point of marriage.
 
Abgar said:
f polygamy were legal what would be the point of marriage.

My argument exactly.
 
What is the point of marriage anyway? To breed? I'm not intreasted in that. I just want procreation.
 
See Post #44.
 
Alright so? thats your belief I have diffrent beliefs.
If I feel like having polygamy with willing particpants then no one has any right to stop me.
 
Well, what if your "different beliefs" said that it wasn't wrong to kill someone because he/she drove too slowly in front of you in the left* lane of a highway?






*assuming you live somewhere where they drive on the right
 
Back in the Ottoman Empire, the Sultan would have a large harem and have children with multiple women in that harem. The ablest (usually) was selected to be the heir, and the rest were ceremoniously strangled.

This is one of the reasons why the Ottoman dynasty was able to stay intact for hundreds of years.
 
{|}$~\ said:
Well, what if your "different beliefs" said that it wasn't wrong to kill someone because he/she drove too slowly in front of you in the left* lane of a highway?






*assuming you live somewhere where they drive on the right

But I don't so thats a moot point is'nt it? ALso my beliefs don't harm anyway as i said as long as all are willing participants and it works both ways what does it matter?
 
SeleucusNicator said:
Back in the Ottoman Empire, the Sultan would have a large harem and have children with multiple women in that harem. The ablest (usually) was selected to be the heir, and the rest were ceremoniously strangled.

This is one of the reasons why the Ottoman dynasty was able to stay intact for hundreds of years.

Ahh...for the good old days.... ;)
 
silver 2039 said:
But I don't so thats[sic] a moot point is'nt[sic] it? ALso[sic] my beliefs don't harm anyway as i[sic] said as long as all are willing participants and it works both ways what does it matter?
But what if your "different beliefs" said that it wasn't wrong to harm other people?
My point is that if you don't have objective standards of right and wrong, you will have anarchy.
 
silver 2039 said:
Ahh...for the good old days.... ;)
I agree.

Today:
Me: "Here lemme help you with that. BTW I have a present for you..."

If I were born a couple hundred years ago:
Me: "Take this tea back and bring me another cup! There's not enough ginseng in it. Oh and send in wife number 5 tonight. Yes the 16 year old! You're too fat already."
 
having multiple wives will surely solved many headache for me. but then thats not possible. how will we feel if our wife have multiple husband too ?

It will be best to love the one and only and have the one and only loves you only. To give her the best of everything and attention till death do us apart.

There can be only one.
 
Ramius75 said:
There can be only one.

And there's the other one waiting for me in the love nest waiting for me. :lol:

Seriously though, with the current increasing rate of divorce, it's better to abolish the mariage institution all together.

Let people get together whenever they want IT, and go separate ways whenever they feel their spouse can't satisfy their needs.
 
Back
Top Bottom