JohnRM
Don't make me destroy you
Knowing that it would inevitably fail, I would care not for its content.
i didnt read the op, but we should make it english and call it something else, hoping nobody will notice.
No it's not.
-regularity in verbs. just one system, that works for all verbs, common or uncommon. no conjugations, no irregularities.
-no genders
-simple plurals - just adding one letter to the end of a noun.
-no agreement between adjectives and nouns
-negation by just one word - adding one word to a sentence for not, a different word for never, a different word for not much etc.
-no peculiar pronunciation - all words are phonetic.
it sounds like the anti-thesis of the German language...![]()
Some form of newspeak, literally. Trim the language down to a bare minimum, conjoin words etc... I believe Russian does this very well, but obviously that would be a no-go for an international language. But for the purposes of the OP, why say 'civilization fanatics centre' when you could say 'civfancen'?
What Winner is proposing doesn't need to be poetic, so I think newspeak would od the job.
Urgh, I despise newspeak, its so ugly.
Why criticize inclusive and exclusive pronouns as not easy? If "easy" is your number one goal, why not eliminate plurality as a whole? Obviously your, as everyone else's definition of "easy" is usually just going to mean "as close to my native language as possible."This doesn't strike me as "easy". As I said, the new language should be as easy as possible, so there will be some trade-offs.