If you read Wikipedia, you are a paedophile

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hailing rom the country which most famous monument is a little pissing boy, i call this discusson silly.
I have a little statuette of that monument on my desk right now, actually. A girl got it for me, though I've never really been able to figure out why.
 
I have a little statuette of that monument on my desk right now, actually. A girl got it for me, though I've never really been able to figure out why.

maybe she thinks you are an hero, when once, your city is under siege, and the enemy want to blow up your walls, you will come waltzing around late at night, get out your willy and save the day.

or maybe she just wants the latter part.
 
maybe she thinks you are an hero, when once, your city is under siege, and the enemy want to blow up your walls, you will come waltzing around late at night, get out your willy and save the day.

or maybe she just wants the latter part.
Or maybe she's already had it, and is mocking it's size by comparing it to a little boy. That was my first thought.
 
I have a little statuette of that monument on my desk right now, actually. A girl got it for me, though I've never really been able to figure out why.

She wants to rub naughty bits with you and she wants you to use the statue to pleasure her, its kinky girls like it....clueless.... :pat:
 
Or maybe she's already had it, and is mocking it's size by comparing it to a little boy. That was my first thought.
Nah.
She wants to rub naughty bits with you and she wants you to use the statue to pleasure her, its kinky girls like it....clueless.... :pat:
The tchotchke in question is the size of my thumb. I suppose it's better than using your wang, but there are definitely bigger things around than that.
 
The tchotchke in question is the size of my thumb. I suppose it's better than using your wang, but there are definitely bigger things around than that.

You have offended my honor sir. Wahar-nuk's at dawn.
 
LMAO,...WFT? You need to make that a thread of it's own,...or I will.


i'm a loss for words..... ugg the memes spawn from this. (place dumb picture here) are people too.

Yeah you can make it a thread! :D I ain't in a thread making mood tonight :p
 
Nah.

The tchotchke in question is the size of my thumb. I suppose it's better than using your wang, but there are definitely bigger things around than that.
If she's never had it, are you gonna remedy that situation? I would, provided she's attractive of course.

And your duel with silver must be on webcam, and we all need links.
 
Are my parents child pornographers? They took lots of nudie pics of me when I was a wee lil' man. I'm even smiling in lots of them. I guess that means I must have been posing suggestively.

Lock them up forthwith! :rolleyes:
 
Are my parents child pornographers? They took lots of nudie pics of me when I was a wee lil' man. I'm even smiling in lots of them. I guess that means I must have been posing suggestively.

Lock them up forthwith! :rolleyes:
Under UK law, I think they technically are child pornographers. At least that's what several posters in this thread have led me to believe.
 
A naked child isn't automatically child pornography, in this case given the actual sexual organs aren't shown I find it odd its even being debated.

It's easy to spot a pedo, kids. He will try to defend child pornography at any costs. Little does he know how he's bankrupting our moral standards and imposing himself on you. It's people like him from which we need to defend ourselves!
 
There is nothing pornographic about the 'virgin killer' cover!

I'm more worried about people who see this picture as sexual. I am afraid they could have some seriously perverted sexual inclinations :dubious:
 
Can we please, please separate the issue of whether this is an indecent photograph of a child, from the issue of whether it should be censored on the internet?

I think that the photo indecently depicts a naked, underaged girl in a sexually provocative position. And, while I wouldn't classify it as pornographic myself, I am not surprised in the least that some people think it is child porn. I don't think that the photograph should have been taken, and I think the band and record label should have thought more carefully about putting it on their front cover.

However, I do NOT support the UK Government and ISPs from censoring the wikipedia article, or any other replications of the image on e.g. Amazon or Play.com. I support censoring genuine child pornography websites, and arresting those involved. But Wikipedia is clearly not a child porn website, and the image is provided for genuine educational purposes.

So lets focus on one thing at a time, eh?
 
To be fair the IWF is not really that affiliated with the government, so it's not exactly 1984 yet.
 
To be fair the IWF is not really that affiliated with the government, so it's not exactly 1984 yet.
Good point. But tbh that actually concerns me even more... that an unelected, unaccountable body can unilaterally censor entire webpages. Yes, I know that individual ISPs can choose whether to adhere to the IWF's recommendations, but I still find it offensive that I have absolutely no say in the matter. If it was open to public vote, I would be more accepting of this whole thing.
 
It's easy to spot a pedo, kids. He will try to defend child pornography at any costs. Little does he know how he's bankrupting our moral standards and imposing himself on you. It's people like him from which we need to defend ourselves!

I'd never seen the image before this thead, I personally don't see anything erotic or pornographic in the image. If you find it pornographic thats an indictment on your character not mine.
 
I'd never seen the image before this thead, I personally don't see anything erotic or pornographic in the image. If you find it pornographic thats an indictment on your character not mine.
indeed, the pic's slightly suggestive. and I wouldn't exactly call it good taste (but hey, we're talking about the scoripions here...) but if that's porn, pretty much any given tv-show is pornographic :ack:
 
sarto_mary_3002.jpg


Durer_Mary_and_child_dsc01706.jpg


Oh dear, oh dear.
 
I hate Wikipedia, and I'm glad whenever anything is done to harm them in any way. Good for the IWF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom