If you read Wikipedia, you are a paedophile

Status
Not open for further replies.
real child porn
since were all pedos anyway i thought i would post some real CP. probably illegal for you to see this so dont open the spoiler if your afraid of the police.

Spoiler :
chris-hanson-nice-to-see-you.jpg

 
Afraid of the police? That's not why I'm staying away from that spoiler. You need a better lead in on the joke. Give us a hint or something. As is, it's creepy as hell. I know you're not a creep, Hoss, but imagine someone who has no knowledge of you reading that... yikes. If you were a stand-up comic, I'd throw fruit at you (before the punch line).


----


So, what's up with this thread title? An attempt to downplay pedophilia? What a super-creepy title, trying to pin pedophilia on people who happen to stumble across a controversial image on wiki. As if stumbling across a controversial image on wiki qualified people as pedos... I'm afraid it takes alot more than that and the title is a bizarre run at equivocation of some sort.
 
Our next visitor, a man who calls himself "Ecofarm" approached the spoiler but became suspicious and decided to leave. Unfortunately for him he was promptly arrested by Flagler Beach police who were waiting outside.
 
So, what's up with this thread title? An attempt to downplay pedophilia? What a super-creepy title, trying to pin pedophilia on people who happen to stumble across a controversial image on wiki. As if stumbling across a controversial image on wiki qualified people as pedos... I'm afraid it takes alot more than that and the title is a bizarre run at equivocation of some sort.

in many places, possesion of child porn is illegal.
Therefore, if we dub the pic child porn, as some people do, merely viewing that site makes you guilty since you now are in possession of a copy of said pic due to the browser cache...I think there's been a ruling somewhere that the pic being in your browser cache is enough, can't remember the exact case though.
 
I've found another obviously child porn album cover on wiki:
LedZeppelinHousesOfTheHolycover.jpg
 
So its okay to show naked babies (Nevermind by Nirvana) but not naked children? Plus its an informational article I mean geez its just as easy to do a Google search or go pick up the album at a store.
 
Afraid of the police? That's not why I'm staying away from that spoiler. You need a better lead in on the joke. Give us a hint or something. As is, it's creepy as hell. I know you're not a creep, Hoss, but imagine someone who has no knowledge of you reading that... yikes. If you were a stand-up comic, I'd throw fruit at you (before the punch line).

You think I'm a pedo. And hossam's far more immoral than me
 
I think you're a pedo??

Wow, talk about putting words in someone's mouth!

Outrageous.

Further, I know of no immorality from Hossam.

I'm glad I came back to this stupid thread, so I could address that.

No more personal comments people, mmmk?

And don't tell me what I think. Don't think that you can represent my opinion. You're not my attorney.

And further, don't go calling other posters immoral. You should either back that up or get your butt kicked.
 
Suppose someone has naked baby pictures of themself. Does that constitute possessing child porn?

Some time back a 14 or 16 year old girl was arrested for taking naked pictures of herself. I think she was charged with creating child pornography. :lol:

Fourtnatley most of these moral crusades and hysteria tend to die down in time. Remember back when everyone was freaking out over Satanic child abuse daycare cults? Yeah found to be compeltly false.
 
If a 14 or 16 year old girl is taking naked pictures of herself, her parents should be arrested.

This world has enough scumbags without people turning their young daughters into whores through neglect or outright abuse. And you think it's funny?

This thread is so disgusting. It really makes me hate internet people in general.
 
I think you're a pedo??

Wow, talk about putting words in someone's mouth!

Outrageous.

Further, I know of no immorality from Hossam.

I'm glad I came back to this stupid thread, so I could address that.

No more personal comments people, mmmk?

I'm pretty sure you hinted at in fiftychat. I wasn't trying to get a dig on you and I'm sorry if I offended you.

And don't tell me what I think. Don't think that you can represent my opinion. You're not my attorney.

You seemed okay with representing dissenting opinions as pedo-apologists in that simpsons thread??

And further, don't go calling other posters immoral. You should either back that up or get your butt kicked.

I'm sure he agrees.
 
If a 14 or 16 year old girl is taking naked pictures of herself, her parents should be arrested.

This world has enough scumbags without people turning their young daughters into whores through neglect or outright abuse. And you think it's funny?

This thread is so disgusting. It really makes me hate internet people in general.

I find it interesting you assume its the parent's fault that their daughter acts like a whore. Teenage girls like taking pictures of them self, clothed, semi-clothed, and in various positions.

For instance who should be arrested for the pictures of Miley Cyrus that she took of herself in the bathroom? And lets not forget the Vanity Fair pictures.
Spoiler :

miley-cyrus-myspace.jpg


miley_cyrus_vf_0430.jpg


In one photo Miley, then 14, takes a shower in a wet t-shirt. A second photo shows Miley with her tummy exposed, blowing a kiss into her iPhone while taking a picture of herself. SEE THE PICTURES HERE

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,24016352-23109,00.html
 
If a 14 or 16 year old girl is taking naked pictures of herself, her parents should be arrested.

This world has enough scumbags without people turning their young daughters into whores through neglect or outright abuse. And you think it's funny?

This thread is so disgusting. It really makes me hate internet people in general.
Her parents shouldn't be arrested, but they should be sterilised to prevent any further bad parenting. After that, the photos should be given to me for safekeeping.

And yes, it is funny, because it's so ridiculously over the top. Child pornography is illegal because it harms and exploits children. Clearly this girl wasn't bloody harming or exploiting herself, when she's the one taking the photo. I'm pretty sure the boyfriend, a 17 year old, was charged alos, which is patently ridiculous also, because it's not like people know what they're being emailed or texted until they see it.

EDIT: That girl is not attractive.
 
You think I'm a pedo. And hossam's far more immoral than me
i do not appreciate that statement, i am an upstanding citizen of the law and im in no way, shape or form more immoral than you jerk.
I'm pretty sure you hinted at in fiftychat. I wasn't trying to get a dig on you and I'm sorry if I offended you.



You seemed okay with representing dissenting opinions as pedo-apologists in that simpsons thread??



I'm sure he agrees.

you can clearly see that i dont.
 
You seemed okay with representing dissenting opinions as pedo-apologists in that simpsons thread??
you don't understand, Ecofarm can represent other peoples' opinion. We can't. Just like he can use blogs to back up his claims, while everybody else can't. See? ;)
 
real child porn
since were all pedos anyway i thought i would post some real CP. probably illegal for you to see this so dont open the spoiler if your afraid of the police.

Spoiler :
chris-hanson-nice-to-see-you.jpg

Dude, that picture stopped being funny about 5 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom