I've been wondering about this. If I know someone is transgender, should I treat them as whatever gender they are presenting themselves as or as a transgender person? I would assume I would treat them as whatever gender they present themselves as* but you seem to indicate it would be better for me to ask them what gender they prefer to identify as. That just seems a bit tactless, along the lines of me asking a person of Asian descent "What country are you from" right off the bat.
*For those who seem to go out of there way to make it difficult to tell visually and it is a situation where it is important for it to be known, I'm sorry but we both get to suffer through the awkwardness of asking what gender you are.
When in doubt, ask in a way that doesn't challenge their identification. Don't ask "what are you" but ask "what pronouns do you use?" Most of the time that's really enough info, but if you absolutely MUST know for whatever reason what their actual gender is, then straightforward "what is your gender" is probably best.
I mean really, we just want to be treated like people and go about our day, and not singled out as freaks or as anything special. If we're appearing in a political capacity then that's typically when we want our identity as trans to "matter" but for the most part just treat us how we look like we're trying to be present, and if you aren't sure how to address us, then just ask what our pronouns are without dwelling on the "OMG YOU'RE TRANS" thing.
Also, it's seriously gonna take me some time to unlearn that contre is a guy. I've kinda internalised that she is a he from way back, so I might end up saying it wrong again, even if I don't mean to.
So long as people demonstrate a willingness to learn and correct themselves, many trans people are okay with this. We understand that it's a process and that it doesn't happen overnight. However, it would be a nice gesture of solidarity if you did your best to get the pronouns and names down at least.
And also, on that note: if you screw up, don't self-flagellate. Doing so redirects the issue to be about you. Just a simple apology or even just a quick correction if you catch it fast enough. Again, a lot of trans people really don't like the idea of the fact that they're trans being broadcast to the world; it's a reminder that we're different, and given the high rates of anti-trans violence, it can in some situations actually place us in more danger.
Actually, that might be a question: Do you find that people sometimes struggle to remember that you're now identifying as women, without them intentionally meaning to be wrong? I figure that mostly happens on the Internet, as in real life there would be more than text to remember the transition from.
Yes.
Seeing as how trans peoples' brain are mostly the same as before any transitioning, wouldn't whatever preferences or abilities have been there from the start anyway? Except for what the hormones do ofc.
Given the highly questionable nature of knowing what a given person's hormonal balance actually is (it's not often based on genitalia), I have problems with statements like this. There's no question that Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) forces this balance in the direction you want, but like, there isn't just "male brain" and "female brain." In fact the very idea of meaningful differences in the brains based on gender is some pretty ancient patriarchal hogwash. Best to avoid it entirely. But if you mean differences in the brains in the area of, say, gender dysphoria and self-actualization, then yeah, hormones can play a huge part in changing the brain's chemistry for the better.
But I think I can give a different question along the same lines: Experiments have shown that women perform worse at math if they had just been exposed to "research" claiming that women are worse at math, while the same correlation was not seen in men. It is hypothesised that this is because women are given a message through society that math is a "guy" thing. Have either of you noticed that you've gotten worse in, say, math, after understanding that you are trans women?
I have not.
This touches on an essential part of gender, though: gender roles are primarily told through sub-conscious messages as part of cultural norms, and this is why socialization based on
assigned gender doesn't stop the creation of transgender people. We didn't "become" the opposite gender, we already were it and the confusion and anxiety of transgender youth arises from this dissonance. We are told that we are one thing, but in reality we are not, but we don't really have the tools to understand this fact, so it results in us hating ourselves for never adequately measuring up to our assigned gender, and thinking that something must be defective in us as a result.
Nonetheless, in children you will see their real gender break through if given the chance to assert itself: boys will play with girls' toys or choose girl characters to play; girls will dress in boys' clothes or want short haircuts, and might want to be called by a boy's name. For example, both my partner and I are genderfluid: she went through a period for years as a child where she insisted on being called a boy's name; I put on my sister's clothes when she wasn't home and tried to make myself look more feminine in the mirror. In both cases we concluded that something must be wrong with us, because neither of us had ever heard of anyone like us, and so we repressed it for a long time.
Some people figure it out; I think of them as the vanguard. They were the first to "come out," the people whose dysphoria was unbearably strong and who had the self-understanding and perspective to understand and untie the mind-[fudge] they had been subjected to. We owe them an enormous debt; today, knowledge of transgender issues and identity means that, for the first time, children are being identified as transgender *as children* and are being allowed to express their true genders instead of being forced to try and fit through a round hole as a square peg. They're being given access to hormone therapy
before puberty and aren't growing up with the crushing depression and suicidal tendencies that older trans people have had to endure. And to be honest, it makes my cry with joy.
It has always seemed to me that transwomen have embraced even the bits of womanhood that ciswomen seem to typically find annoying - menstruation, needing to wear a bra, stupid men acting stupid, etc. Aside from wondering if either of you agree with this, I was wondering how far it goes - one example of the far end of it would be getting paid less for really the same job, and what has to be the same knowledge/experience/competence level because HRT certainly doesn't change that. And do you feel more vulnerable as a woman (well, as no longer presenting as a male) in dangerous neighborhoods, or find that you're taken less seriously in conversations or any similar stereotypical situations of that sort?
I come at this form the angle of Marxism-Leninism, so my angle will not be the same as others in this thread. However, the Revolutionary Alliance of Transgender People Against Capitalism (RATPAC) is focused on developing a critical theory of gender in conjunction with Marxism and communist politics, and the prevailing view among this crowd is that oppressed genders are like oppressed nationalities: a certain amount of reclamation of their identity is an essential part of their liberation. Just like, for example, the nationalism of nations oppressed by colonialism can play an important, liberatory role (think Frantz Fanon's "Black Skin, White Masks") in that they are standing up against an ideology that insists that they are inferior and they are saying "no, we are equals just like you, with an identity that we deserve to be proud of just like you are of yours!" that oppressed genders can, should, and do do much the same thing.
There are some confused feminists who try to tell us that we are "reinforcing gender when we should be trying to abolish it," but we see these people in the exact same way that we see people who say that "all nationalism is bad, because we are trying to abolish nation-states," and this ignores a basic right of people to celebrate themselves in ways not oppressive to others, and that the struggle of oppressed people to celebrate their oppressed identities and make them equal is an essential part of actually making them equal and free in the first place.