It's such a murky process that it's hard to pin down. In a simplified version, the clinical standard follows a pretty linear path.
Not all doctors will do HRT. Many cannot afford to see a doctor who will start HRT. Many doctors who will start HRT require one of two things: the patient has lived for some amount of time as the gender they identify as (I normally saw 3 months) or they've had a qualified mental health professional recommend the patient start HRT... and that'll also be at least 3 months of counseling. A few doctors, more in the US than here, practice Informed Consent and let the patient decide what to do. So if someone has access to an informed consent clinic, they can start HRT tomorrow. I had to wait 5 months (3 months therapist + 1 month referral for Endocrinologist + 1 month for various tests).
If your goal is SRS, it's going to be at least 24 (more like 36) months more from this point. That assumes you have access to the resources, but not enough to bribe unethical doctors. That 24 months breaks down roughly as follows. It will take a few months to stabilize your hormone levels. Once that is done the standard would be to allow HRT at least 1 year to work before considering SRS.* In practice, most professionals would want to see evidence that your body had finished responding to hormones or that you'd give it 2 years to do so. At this point you'll start doing preliminary work for a major surgical operation that includes month, at least, of recovery.
So to answer your question, a quick timeline would be three years for SRS, and an exceptional one two years, assuming access to the resources to meet that schedule. That's a big assumption.
*To skip that, you would really need to bribe someone or be an exceptional case. Surgeons require letters from qualified professionals before they'll do anything. Qualified is not an arbitrary term -- doctors (and insurers) need some confidence they're not going to get sued by someone who changes their mind, or that they have a good defense against such a lawsuit. It would be very very unusual for a qualified professional to sign off SRS before this point.
Eh?
Yes. Yes, I would like to ask a question.
I didn't realize there was such a long time period in that transitioning period, but I suppose that makes sense. Is bribery (or other unethical "accelerators" for the lack of a better term) common for professionals that offer HRT or SRS?
To clarify a bit on what I meant by a linear process, I'm asking that if you start off as 0% transitioned, and there is some time at which you are 100% transitioned, does HRT transition you, say, 2% per month over 50 months (just using round numbers for convenience), or does it incrementally ramp up from 0.5% in the first month and it ramps up to like 4% in the last? Or, based on what you said about stabilization, do you see a giant 10% change in the first few months and then smaller 0.5% changes in the last few?
It really depends on what the end goal of transitioning is, for some they want hormones and SRS, others want just hormones, some can't do SRS for medical reasons, others can't do hormones.So, here's a question that might have already been asked but I'm late to the thread:
How long does it take you to transition? Is it kind of a consistent and linear process, or does it go faster or slower at the beginning or end of the time period?
The issue is not about transgender people per se, it is about men taking such a law and invading women's spaces claim the law gives them the right to be there.Exactly. If you know the genitals of someone else in the bathroom, you're the one doing something inappropriate.
I obviously think it's important to fight for the right of transgender people (and thus all people) to go to the bathroom wherever they feel comfortable.
If you don't want to poop next to a trans person, the go poop at home, which is what people who don't like public restrooms already do.
I didn't realize there was such a long time period in that transitioning period, but I suppose that makes sense. Is bribery (or other unethical "accelerators" for the lack of a better term) common for professionals that offer HRT or SRS?
To clarify a bit on what I meant by a linear process, I'm asking that if you start off as 0% transitioned, and there is some time at which you are 100% transitioned, does HRT transition you, say, 2% per month over 50 months (just using round numbers for convenience), or does it incrementally ramp up from 0.5% in the first month and it ramps up to like 4% in the last? Or, based on what you said about stabilization, do you see a giant 10% change in the first few months and then smaller 0.5% changes in the last few?
The issue is not about transgender people per se, it is about men taking such a law and invading women's spaces claim the law gives them the right to be there.
Moderator Action: As a general reminder, please heed Bootstoots' earlier warning.
Moderator Action: Reminder to all posters: this thread is here to ask questions to transgender people who wish to share their experiences. Arguments don't belong here. If you must argue about something that popped up in this thread, create your own thread and discuss it there.
Everyone should follow this guideline from the OP:
You are welcome to ask as many follow up questions as you would like. However, this thread is not a place for debate. If you're here to argue instead of listen, please do not post.
All further posts which seek to debate or argue will be infracted. You are welcome to debate or argue in other threads (to the extent that such argument complies with the forum rules).
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
From my interactions with conservatives I think they actually are indeed talking about cis males.What do you mean men? Do you honestly think cismales will start doing that?
HRT does near maximal change within 2 years generally.Is there any foretellers if one may pass after 2-3 years of HRT based only on HRT?
I have read that starting hormones at age of 16 or earlier is generally the most promising case, but many countries don't diagnose transsexualism before 18, therefore one is stuck with starting HRT later.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but the whole transition process sounds to me a bit like pulling a rabbit out of the box, unless a person has nearly unlimited money. If a mtf can't pass after transition her life may be ruined to a big extent, isn't this the case?
The general conservative argument is about locker rooms and showers more than bathrooms. There probably are things you could charge someone with like voyeurism.I was under the impression that (generally speaking) there are no laws prohibiting people from using the toilets that disagree with their sex. Why would people suddenly start doing this if a law was passed that explixitly said it wasn't illegal?
Did you notice yourself losing muscle strength and/or mass after a while on HRT?
Is there any foretellers if one may pass after 2-3 years of HRT based only on HRT?
I have read that starting hormones at age of 16 or earlier is generally the most promising case, but many countries don't diagnose transsexualism before 18, therefore one is stuck with starting HRT later.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but the whole transition process sounds to me a bit like pulling a rabbit out of the box, unless a person has nearly unlimited money. If a mtf can't pass after transition her life may be ruined to a big extent, isn't this the case?
Please forgive me Contre if you consider this an intrusion on your thread
The issue is not about transgender people per se, it is about men taking such a law and invading women's spaces claim the law gives them the right to be there.
At the time of posting, there are 65,839 threads on OT just dying for a cis-male viewpoint.
I mean you're basically admitting to throwing trans women under the bus in order to protect yourselves from men. If you force a trans woman to use the men's restroom then you're immediately outing them as trans, and that exposes them to far more danger than any cis woman ever faces.
I love you.
Having seen multiple transwomen go on HRT how it affects their bodies varies depending upon individual, fat distribution beforehand, whether they gain or lose weight after starting. It of course also affects different things in different ways, for example fat redistribution happens slowly, but weight gained after reaching gender appropriate hormone levels tends to distribute as one would expect for their gender.
Changes in muscle mass happen on HRT (FtM gain, MtF lose). I've lost some weight, but I don't know if that's related.
It is not my opinion, it is the opinion of conservatives who I have interacted with. I do understand how it could make cis women uncomfortable to see a penis in the women's locker room or changing room given that many of those lack privacy.
Omega124 said:It's making a fuss over a complete non-issue. Creeps are rare, and they'll be dealt with accordingly. No need to oppress people because of incorrect biases over such rare incidents, however.
Regarding the other thing… hang in there. You're still a human being, even if for some reason I, a 100%™ heterosexual male on the Internetz, can't fathom why anyone would become a woman.(cheer up!) In fact, do women really exist?