Probably because it's so stupid to provoke the US like that - especially when a large number of their allies are already screaming in their ears to declare war on Iran - that even the Iranians have more sense than to try it.
I don't think the Iranians have any reason to fear an attack by the US unless they did a hell of a lot more than shoot down a drone. They know we're overextended.
I don't think the Iranians have any reason to fear an attack by the US unless they did a hell of a lot more than shoot down a drone. They know we're overextended.
I don't think the Iranians have any reason to fear an attack by the US unless they did a hell of a lot more than shoot down a drone. They know we're overextended.
All countries' armed forces keep quite a lot of slack in the system. For example, the British would be quite unwilling to take on another mission at the moment; because about a tenth of the army is committed to operations and we don't want to have a situation in which we're making people do long tours without adequate rest in between, so we say that we have two 'deployable' divisions. Were there a need to use them, however, we actually have seven divisions, and that's before we consider that the territorials don't generally group into formations but provide replacements for regular units, so if they were called up en masse that could add another division again... so even though there's 8 divisions that the Queen can call upon should it be required, we still don't commit more than one or two to anything under usual circumstances.
Same goes for the yanks - if they needed to attack Iran, they'd have to dig into the 'contingency fund' of troops, but for a short while this could be managed.
you don't think it would be insanely counterproductive? seriously?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.