Luckymoose
The World is Mine
Then why don't women get erect when they see breast?
Because they lack penises.
Then why don't women get erect when they see breast?
Because they lack penises.
I should have listened to you earlier You've got this Phyiscal/Cultural Anthropology/ Sociology stuff down! Grade school down!Who says women don't get aroused by other women? I know way more bi girls than any straight ones.

Then why don't women get erect when they see breast?
Don't you think it's exactly the same root as liking to lick/suck on breasts? 
Perhaps our natural attraction to women comes from breast feeding or being comforted by mothers as infants? Pretty sure it isn't born that way.

Perhaps our natural attraction to women comes from breast feeding or being comforted by mothers as infants? Pretty sure it isn't born that way.
This thread choose to be gay.
Who says women don't get aroused by other women? I know way more bi girls than any straight ones.
Little boys who watch Ellen Degeneres show become gay.
I can't even be angry with how ridiculous what you're saying is, it's too funny. Thank you for being too funny to be taken seriously.I'm not sure the thread was intelligently designed.No, it was forced by society.

What I find amusing his how so many people will argue w/ trolls whom they can tell are A. completely unreasonable and B. have no interest in doing anything other than being inflammatory. Have we all forgotten the wisdom of simply ignoring people who espouse idiotic/hateful/bigoted/******** sentiments? In so much that they have no power?I can't even be angry with how ridiculous what you're saying is, it's too funny. Thank you for being too funny to be taken seriously.
Mortality rates were surely never high enough that a few percent of the population being gay would cause extinction! Where are you getting this from?For thousands of years, humans have had to have sex with [healthy] women in order to have [their] children [survive]. Nowadays, there are so many new inventions (and children) that this is no longer vital to our survival, so this is possible. That is why until a few hundred years ago, being homosexual was impossible for survival.
I guess people not having children is only possible via a "birth defect" too then.The human instinct to reproduce, is, however, still here, so the only reason gayness would be possible is by birth defects. The reason it's possible to go back is because humans still have that tiny attraction to the opposite sex, and this can be nurtured and grow to a love.
I don't know about that lord. I think the rampant homosexuality in prisons is evidence that people can even decide to like sex with men.
Being gay is a choice. I remember when I was little most of my friends and myself thought girls were icky. But then we realized girls are hot and thus we were hetero. Gays do the same thing sept they pick men.
*ANCK!* Wrong! I picked girls because everyone else did because everyones parents told them to over the years.
No, you picked them because it's the human instinct. Why would your parents be telling you that? Because their parents told them it. And so on and so on.See normal boys are told as small children that they will grow up and meet nice girls and have kids. This puts girls as the correct choice into your mind.
Mortality rates were surely never high enough that a few percent of the population being gay would cause extinction! Where are you getting this from?
Birth rates have fallen in developed countries, but this is far more likely due to less children per family, or less people choosing to have children, than any supposed increase in homosexuality.
I guess people not having children is only possible via a "birth defect" too then.
That's different, they are forced to it. They don't necessarily like it.
So if they force themselves to be gay it seems to me that they are indeed choosing to be gay. As they could choose to be abstinent instead.
