Israel

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know about a "place" argument... why not an Aboriginal Australian Civ or the Eskimo's?
Before I get snarky, is there simply a way to choose which Civ's to disable?
 
Because they didn't have states? Before I get snarky, that much should be obvious.
 
Massive cultural if not historical importance pervading over nearly the entire world, Judaism being the inspiration for Christianity & Islam, which then determined the different paths Western Civilization and Nahoust/Maghreb took.
Also quite a lot DoW's GP are Jews.
 
Massive cultural if not historical importance pervading over nearly the entire world, Judaism being the inspiration for Christianity & Islam, which then determined the different paths Western Civilization and Nahoust/Maghreb took.
Also quite a lot DoW's GP are Jews.

Irrelevant. As stated before, modern Israel is not the same as Old Israel and Judah.
 
Well, the Greek City-States or Holy Roman Empire don't exactly equate to Austria or Modern Greece either.

HRE > Austria simply because of the Germany split, and it was the easiest way to keep the HRE after the Prussia spawn. Greece > Modern Greece is not the best example for you, as your original Israel suggestion was one that would spawn in the modern age, yet you backed up your suggestion by using accomplishments and examples from Old Israel. By all means if you want to, keep trying to convince us, but I am steadfast in my opinion that Israel is not a good civilization choice, and I'm sure that Leoreth is also pretty solid in his opinion too.
 
HRE > Austria simply because of the Germany split, and it was the easiest way to keep the HRE after the Prussia spawn. Greece > Modern Greece is not the best example for you, as your original Israel suggestion was one that would spawn in the modern age, yet you backed up your suggestion by using accomplishments and examples from Old Israel. By all means if you want to, keep trying to convince us, but I am steadfast in my opinion that Israel is not a good civilization choice, and I'm sure that Leoreth is also pretty solid in his opinion too.

Agreed and well stated, Bair.


Pavel,

1) If you are so knowledgeable about Judaism, then surely you must know that Judaism didn't look anything like how it is now before they were exposed to Zoroastrianism.
The concept of Heaven and Hell was "borrowed/ripped off/inspired by" the conflict
between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu, as well as numerous other aspects such as Judaism.
As well, Zoroastrianism is associated with the world's first imperial power, Persia, and it had its influences on Western culture as well, via the cult of Mithra.
So if you are going to argue for the "origin of Abrahamic religion", you've already been cut to the chase. Zoroastrianism is it.

2) You are also full of hypocrisies, as Bair astutely pointed out.
Your original concept was for the modern state of Israel, and NOT for the Kingdom of Israel or Judah,
the latter grouping of which I would consider as a true civilization,
but still wouldn't want to include because of space issues. (The Phoenician capital is literally 2 tiles away)
That you try to tie the old states with the new to bolster your argument for their
world impact when they have absolutely no semblance of association just kills your argument.
On top of that, I recall you mentioning that you can't play past a certain point because DoC apparently requires "super-computers".
(Get with the times, the minimum standard RAM is now 2-4GB at the very least).
If Israel is going to be a modern addition spawning from the 1900s, then what does it matter to you?
You're not going to be able to play them, given your own description.
So it leads me to wonder why you want them in the game so badly.

3) Third, your attitude does not help with your point.
You seem almost incapable of trying to make a point without denigrating something else in the process.
I can't speak for other users, but from my perspective, you have shown time and time again that you are a consistent and unapologetic bigot.
Every other post you seem to make seems to include some kind of charged statement toward some group or category;
usually Islam, as myself and at least one other user have called you out on.
I'm no mind-reader, but that in particular definitely leads me to believe that you have an agenda
concerning the inclusion of Israel, which I can't say for any other users who have vouched for Israel.

And yeah, this hurts your position too.
I'm not trying to prevent you from expressing your bigotry by the way; I just think this (DoC) is not the proper forum for it.
I'm positive that you can fulfill your needs to spew anti-Islam + any country/peoples who you seem to think is/are "politically unliberal" elsewhere without disrupting game development here.

Might I suggest Off-Topic?

This post also serves as a second (third if you count Leoreth) no to the inclusion of this particular civilization.
 
This post also serves as a second (third if you count Leoreth) no to the inclusion of this particular civilization.

This post serves as a third! Or fourth. There are just so many better choices for extra civilizations... why people so often have an obsession with Israel I don't quite understand. No matter what mod or game it is, if it shows the Levant on the map, you can rest assured in knowing that SOMEONE will ask for Israel to be included.
 
This post serves as a third! Or fourth. There are just so many better choices for extra civilizations... why people so often have an obsession with Israel I don't quite understand. No matter what mod or game it is, if it shows the Levant on the map, you can rest assured in knowing that SOMEONE will ask for Israel to be included.

This post counts as fourth or fifth. The area is crowded enough already, and requires no more civilizations to make matters worse. If people are so persistent with adding Israel, why don't they just add an independent or barbarian presence in Jerusalem, or even worldbuilder your capital into Jerusalem. Sure, 3% of DoC users may want Israel, but it would just serve as a nuisance for everyone else.
 
Have i said no before? Because i say no now in case i havent said before. It's really something when tomorrow's dawn heavy handed post feels deserved.
 
Agreed and well stated, Bair.


Pavel,

1) If you are so knowledgeable about Judaism, then surely you must know that Judaism didn't look anything like how it is now before they were exposed to Zoroastrianism.
The concept of Heaven and Hell was "borrowed/ripped off/inspired by" the conflict
between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu, as well as numerous other aspects such as Judaism.
As well, Zoroastrianism is associated with the world's first imperial power, Persia, and it had its influences on Western culture as well, via the cult of Mithra.

So if you are going to argue for the "origin of Abrahamic religion", you've already been cut to the chase. Zoroastrianism is it.

2) You are also full of hypocrisies, as Bair astutely pointed out.
Your original concept was for the modern state of Israel, and NOT for the Kingdom of Israel or Judah,
the latter grouping of which I would consider as a true civilization,
but still wouldn't want to include because of space issues. (The Phoenician capital is literally 2 tiles away)
That you try to tie the old states with the new to bolster your argument for their
world impact when they have absolutely no semblance of association just kills your argument.
On top of that, I recall you mentioning that you can't play past a certain point because DoC apparently requires "super-computers".
(Get with the times, the minimum standard RAM is now 2-4GB at the very least).
If Israel is going to be a modern addition spawning from the 1900s, then what does it matter to you?
You're not going to be able to play them, given your own description.
So it leads me to wonder why you want them in the game so badly.

3) Third, your attitude does not help with your point.
You seem almost incapable of trying to make a point without denigrating something else in the process.
I can't speak for other users, but from my perspective, you have shown time and time again that you are a consistent and unapologetic bigot.
Every other post you seem to make seems to include some kind of charged statement toward some group or category;
usually Islam, as myself and at least one other user have called you out on.
I'm no mind-reader, but that in particular definitely leads me to believe that you have an agenda
concerning the inclusion of Israel, which I can't say for any other users who have vouched for Israel.

And yeah, this hurts your position too.
I'm not trying to prevent you from expressing your bigotry by the way; I just think this (DoC) is not the proper forum for it.
I'm positive that you can fulfill your needs to spew anti-Islam + any country/peoples who you seem to think is/are "politically unliberal" elsewhere without disrupting game development here.

Might I suggest Off-Topic?

This post also serves as a second (third if you count Leoreth) no to the inclusion of this particular civilization.

I don't know about the former claim, but actually Christianity influenced Roman Mithraism not the other way around.

The rest of the curbstomp is accurate.
 
I think there were two separate claims, that Zoroastrianism influenced Christianity, and that Zoroastrianism was represented in the Mediterranean by the cult of Mithra. Afaik we know very little of what Mithraism actually was about.
 
I don't know about the former claim, but actually Christianity influenced Roman Mithraism not the other way around.

The rest of the curbstomp is accurate.

The Trinity is based on the Ahuric Triad, of which Mithra is a part of.
The Ahuric Triad is composed of Ahura Mazda, who comprises of the most important part (God) and the other two points are occupied by Anahita and Mithra,
the latter of which can be associated with Jesus as in some sources, Mithra is described as the son of Ahura Mazda.
There's a number of other influences too, but I don't even want to get into the whole Zeitgeist Solar Messiah thing,
which is somewhat dubious and somewhat not at the same time.

Concerning Leoreth's assessment, I think it's more safe to say that aspects of Zoroastrianism influenced the development of Christianity in Rome
(as did aspects of the Dodekathon and Greek mythology) than the other way around especially since Zoroastrianism predated Christianity and it also majorly influenced Judaism beforehand.

EDIT: In my sentence where I was mentioning the conflict between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu and following up with "as well as Judaism",
it was not my intention to write that, as it doesn't even make sense in the context of my post, so please disregard that.
It's probably why you thought I was referring to Christianity though. The influences are still myriad though.
Here is a good article that can help shed some light on the topic though:

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/15283-zoroastrianism
 
Interesting read, this thread has been.

Isn't the answer to why there are "include Israel as a civ" threads the same as the long-running "include Poland/Korea/Ukraine" etc. threads that were endlessly petitioning Rhye during his active modding for Civ IV?
 
I replace England with Israel and use a famous Israeli footballer as LH?
 
There's a number of other influences too, but I don't even want to get into the whole Zeitgeist Solar Messiah thing,
which is somewhat dubious and somewhat not at the same time.
Zeitgeist sucks and is completely dubious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom