It's About to Get Hot at the Border

Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel I'm the world's first trillionaire, and simultaneously married to Jessica Alba and Ashley Judd. If feeling things made them true, I'd be much happier.
Sounds like someone needs to take a course at Trump University.
 
Most of his wealth is in real estate and how that is valued is key: market value, insurance value, cost, income stream value, "what I think it is worth" value, etc.
 
Forbes has also said he badgers them to inflate his rating, and they fault themselves for having given in to that over the years. If their estimate of 3b is very recent, then it might fall in the stage when they're trying to do a more accurate assessment, but if it's from a while ago, it might be seriously overstated.

Of course, he could just release his tax returns; then we could just know. The fact that he doesn't want to do that suggests that the actual value is lower than the lowest reported value (or he'd do it to boast).

In a deposition, he once famously said his wealth is whatever he feels it is: https://money.cnn.com/2011/04/21/news/companies/donald_trump/index.htm

Yeah, he just likes big-sounding numbers--bigly big.

The links I posted in post #146 shows where forbes gets their numbers from. They have annual lists. One link updated in Sept is a breakdown showing he has 1.5 billion worth of NY real estate for example. 'Cash and personal assets' are indeed around 300 million, but his 'net worth' would include his real estate and businesses. The other forbes link supposedly is updated everyday, but I can't imagine they do an assessment on all his properties every day, just changes it when it is known when something he owns has changed in value.

I do suspect his over-reporting of his net worth is to feed his ego, not because he doesn't know math.
 
Here's the bit on Forbes now acknowledging that they earlier just took Trump's own word for things: http://fortune.com/2018/04/20/trump-lied-wealth-forbes-400-list/

Yeah, 30 years ago, and I already posted how he posed as someone else (well, not someone else, but a fictitious person). I would hope their methodology has improved a bit since then. 'Estimate' being the key word, I don't think they know right down to the dollar how much someone is worth, but they are not likely going to estimate 3 billion if he's only worth 200 million.
 
May not be in the near future....
 
Nobody in this government is forcing any of these people to come here, so you concentration camp claims are just beyond the rediculous.

In any case, they are not here NOW, so....
 
Nobody in this government is forcing any of these people to come here, so you concentration camp claims are just beyond the rediculous.

In any case, they are not here NOW, so....

Well it is a camp.
And its purpose is too concentrate them in one place.
 
Nobody in this government is forcing any of these people to come here, so you concentration camp claims are just beyond the rediculous.

In any case, they are not here NOW, so....
Exactly... so why are thousands of troops being sent to the border to "stop them"?

Also...there's no "e" in "ridiculous".... just sayin'... if you wanna' mock folks...spellcheck.
 
Well it is a camp.
And its purpose is too concentrate them in one place.
Nah, we can offer them free trips to syria

Exactly... so why are thousands of troops being sent to the border to "stop them"?

Also...there's no "e" in "ridiculous".... just sayin'... if you wanna' mock folks...spellcheck.
You are the one smugly making claims about concentration camps, so i honestly think its you who has the problem....

EDIT. how about "moronic"? Did i spell that right?
 
Nah, we can offer them free trips to syria


You are the one smugly making claims about concentration camps, so i honestly think its you who has the problem....

EDIT. how about "moronic"? Did i spell that right?

Indeed you did. Who are you trying to apply it to, pray tell?

Meanwhile, your argument has been beaten into the ground. They ARE "in the line" as currently defined, since they are on their way to ask for asylum, which is currently a legal action. Your only argument being "but it may not be in the future" is so blatantly irrelevant that it seems more like just the snark of someone who can't admit defeat.
 
Indeed you did. Who are you trying to apply it to, pray tell?

Meanwhile, your argument has been beaten into the ground. They ARE "in the line" as currently defined, since they are on their way to ask for asylum, which is currently a legal action. Your only argument being "but it may not be in the future" is so blatantly irrelevant that it seems more like just the snark of someone who can't admit defeat.
The snark was related to the "ridiculous" (better?) comment about "concentration camps", so I am impervious to your tangential shanks tim, take them somewhere else.
 
Well it is a camp.
And its purpose is too concentrate them in one place.
The snark was related to the "ridiculous" (better?) comment about "concentration camps", so I am impervious to your tangential shanks tim, take them somewhere else.

I suppose since you were also completely flummoxed by Silurian's comment my "tangential shanks" aren't really needed. But when someone who is so obviously swimming against an overwhelming tide of facts just refuses to go quietly who can really resist the opportunity to stick them?
 
Im swimming against the blue wave :lol::lol::lol:

EDIT. :lmao::lmao:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom