nonconformist
Miserable
Maybe he had to hit 88mph
It should be obvious given what I have posted. I don't know how I could make it any clearer. Perhaps you didn't see my edit. But even so, I think it was clear from my first comment.
It's illegal. And it's also dangerous. There tends to be more debris on the shoulder than in the traffic lanes. So more likely to hit something that will damage a tire. Or just send you off the road. There are fewer places to dodge to if you see something in your way. And the people doing it tend to be going too fast for conditions.
Let's face it, there's a lot of bad drivers on the road. Texting or talking on the cell, drinking and drug abusing, selfish, careless or just plain ignorant.
I think if traffic is backed up, people should be allowed to make their own lanes. I also think they should drive in the dirt to get around traffic. If the road engineers won't make more lanes, create your own lanes.
maybe he was a criminal who needed to make a getaway
Just pull your car slightly into the shoulder. A foot or two.
Yeah, that's what I do.
Cars will likely be around for centuries. But they won't be powered by fossil fuels.Let's face it, there's a lot of bad drivers on the road. Texting or talking on the cell, drinking and drug abusing, selfish, careless or just plain ignorant. I hope most of us here will just practice safe and defensive driving. After all, cars will be all gone in a few decades so enjoy them now.
It certainly eases current congestion even if it does help lead to more growth in many cases. The SF bay area foolishly decided decades ago that they would simply stop building the necessary infrastructure for the existing population because it would stop future growth. It didn't. Now, many people face 2 hour commutes instead of 30 minute ones. The obvious solution is to build viable mass transit in urban areas where the density is sufficient to warrant it, as well as providing highways that have reasonable capacity. New York City is an excellent example.It's pretty well documented that high way congestion isn't eased by added capacity. If you turn a 4-lane highway into a 6-lane highway you won't reduce congestion by 50% and the increases you do see are lost within a few years. So your suggestion wouldn't actually lessen traffic.
It certainly eases current congestion even if it does help lead to more growth in many cases. The SF bay area foolishly decided decades ago that they would simply stop building the necessary infrastructure for the existing population because it would stop future growth. It didn't. Now, many people face 2 hour commutes instead of 30 minute ones. The obvious solution is to build viable mass transit in urban areas where the density is sufficient to warrant it, as well as providing highways that have reasonable capacity. New York City is an excellent example.
There are indeed many posers who buy large pickup trucks instead of cars, just as their are those who buy 4WD vehicles and never take them off road or drive in snow and ice. But there are also many who use trucks for their intended purpose.
Access to affordable personal transportation is one of the reasons why the US economy did so well in the 20th Century compared to other countries. Owning an automobile is indeed part of the American tradition for most people, and there is no doubt we desperately need much better public transportation in suitable urban areas. But I'm sure personal transportation will be around in some form for a very long time to come. It provides great freedom to be able to go anyplace you wish any time you wish, instead of being at the mercy of public transportation. This is especially true if that public transportation is woefully inadequate, as it is in the great majority of places.
And the new Fiat 500 is hot. We definitely need more downsized vehicles like that. The problem is that a full-size pickup or SUV would squash it like a bug at highway speeds...