It's not Islam, is it?

But if Islam is the truth, absolutely and entirely, why would anyone be able to convert away from it? That just wouldn't make any sense.

And the state of women in the West isn't all it's cracked up to be, either. Despite so called liberal attitudes and equality legislation, women are generally very much discriminated against.

It's far superior to many Islamic countries. At least we've made enormous strides to improving female autonomy. We recognise and enact policy which benefits the female position. We are on a different plane morally to how Islamic countries treat woman.
 
Well, I'm not so sure.

Look how many trafficked sex workers there are. Look how women typically occupy part time low paid jobs. Look how many women there are in Parliament. Look at how much unpaid work is done by women. Etc.
 
Well, I'm not so sure.

Look how many trafficked sex workers there are. Look how women typically occupy part time low paid jobs. Look how many women there are in Parliament. Look at how much unpaid work is done by women. Etc.

yeah your right, saudia arabia is far superior place to be if your a woman...:lol:
 
Well, at least they don't have to drive anywhere.

But I was really saying that the plight of women in the West is nothing to brag about, either.
 
it's not ideal, but nothing is. we are taking steps to improve it, they aren't.

we are far superior to the islamic hordes.
 
You have a valuable perspective, Haroon.

Thank you :) the good words that nice to hear is always a free but valuable charity to give. But today peoples rarely give it even its free.

The matter of dress codes is interesting.

In Afghanistan, I am told, women going about without the hijab are considered prostitutes.

In the US, I am told, public nudity is illegal.

These are different cultures. That seems to be all.

I don't know about the prostitutes part. For muslim women indeed hijab is obligatory for them. That is a strong opinion even it is in Quran.

If you back around 60-70 years ago in US a women also go to the church wearing white hat and long skirt, they still have a sense of shame on showing or exposing their beauty. Maybe at that time they still understand this concept, also nun applying the same concept on what our sister do.

But now clothes is not meant to cover the nakedness of the body, clothes more into celebrating the nakedness body. You see many women wearing clothes now a day but it is too open or too tight or too what ever and it not end up covering their nakedness but exploiting their nakedness, making it more attractive.

That is something that is forbidden for both male and female in muslim community. We show part of our body just for our spouse and our definition of nakedness is different than the majority of peoples in the world today, and that is true. Except maybe for catholic nun and coptic christian.

And on a hijab, the nun chooses, which is quite different from being forced as is the norm in some islamic places. There is nothing wrong at all with the basic concept of one, if a woman chooses to do so as a sign of her religious piety so be it. If religious law in the area forces her to, that is where the problem is.

Then it will be "Do What Thou Wilt". It will be like we can do what we want and what we desire even it contradict to the very basic to our religious norm? If that is the case we are not a muslim anymore.

Islam mean submission, taslim, we submit to something even sometime we don't understand it, we don't prove it empirically, we don't smell it, we don't see it. That is whats all about for being a muslim, muslim derive from the words taslim mean submission. We submit completely.

As it imply in Quran Surah Albaqarah ayah 2

Dzalikal kitabula roybafih, hudalil mutaqin

This is a Book that there is no doubt inside it, a guidance for the pious.

Now who is the pious? the ayah continue, ayah 3

Aladzina yu minuna bil ghoib

Those who believe in unseen, or Ghoib.

This is the essence of all religion, they believe to the unseen, include believe in God is believe in the unseen, some of the order maybe we don't know the benefit of it while other we know it. Backthen we don't know what is the benefit of circumcision but now even a christian, hindust or agnostic doing it not because they are Jew or muslim but because at last sciences discover the benefit of it. Before peoples realize the dangerous of alcohol we already stop it, not for our health, or something, and now when peoples start to realize the bad side of consuming alcohol many of them also follow the sunnah and stop drinking alcohol, not because they are Jew or Muslim but because sciences discover the benefit of it at last.

So do on following other order there might something that we don't understand why, and there might other who finally we know the reason why, but what ever it is we do it because we believe to something that beyond our comprehension.

And believing mean, trust it in your heart, say it to your mouth and materialize it in your action. This is the true believe.
 
Well, at least they don't have to drive anywhere.

But I was really saying that the plight of women in the West is nothing to brag about, either.

I don't mean to be disagreeable but it is something to brag about. What we have needs improvement, but it's still better for women here than pretty much anywhere else in all of history.
 
I don't mean to be disagreeable but it is something to brag about. What we have needs improvement, but it's still better for women here than pretty much anywhere else in all of history.

This is indisputable I guess. Though I've heard Tuareg women get quite a good deal. And Sikhism seems to place women centrally equally.

But women seem to be steadfastly treated as second-class citizens very nearly everywhere. Which is something mysterious to me, since they are clearly superior in every way. And I'd do anything any one of them told me to.
 
Mandatory State issued religious ID cards, active discrimination against non-muslims for jobs and promotions, death penalty in countries like Iran for coverting away from Islam. Etc, etc. That far more legal and societal hate and prejudice than the western countries have against Islam.

You always pressing on Mandatory state religious id cards things, let me tell you something, first it is in Indonesia, and if you think it is for discrimination against non muslim for jobs and promotions then really you are horribly horribly wrong. In Indonesia the non muslim doesn't limited to any Job that they want to do, so don't making up all those things, have you live there yourselves? I live there pretty long.

They can choose what ever job they have, they even been put in important official places as the well known high ranking official like Sarwo Edi the father in law of the president of Indonesia today is a christian, the high rank military in the time of Soeharto Beni Murdani is a non muslim, the former minister of Indonesia Joop Ave is a non muslim.

so what are you trying to stand here for? You stand to critizing the great emirate of Indonesia or Indonesia Sultanate which is not exist?

Will you agree if I tell you we hate non muslim and we wish to take our gun and put in the head of any non muslim to make them convert to Islam? and we want to kill all of you non-muslim and want to discriminate you in extreme level? We don't even care if you are muslim or not. We are not here to convert you as it state in the Quran :


“If it had been your Lord’s will, all of the people on Earth would have believed. Would you then compel the people so to have them believe?” (Quran 10:99)

or

“Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth has been made clear from error. Whoever rejects false worship and believes in God has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that never breaks. And God hears and knows all things.” (Quran 2:256)

We don't own guidance, we don't own retribution, God own it why should we force you into something that is not you?

And Indonesia is not an Islamic country, far far far from that.

Look, The reason of the ID cards things is because their first state regulation in what so called Pancasila or the five base of Indonesia goverment is Believing in God. So even they can be agnostic but for official reason they must choose their religion into their ID card. Now don't ask me why, these is their consensus on establishing their government, and democracy is about a consensus of group of peoples that been "believe" as representation of peoples.




I actually think you need to realize that learning Islamic history/culture from someone who is deeply Islamic is about as good as learning Christianity from a Priest or someone deeply rooted in the religion. It is not a fair and balanced review of the religion or faith. Clerics and people who are deeply religious are always going to be incredibly biased and ignore alot of the bad them that their religion or faith inspires. You need to learn for an indepedent outside source that isn't pro-islam or anti-islam.

I was anti Islam before in my early university I against one of the Islamic worldwide group that inject their member in the university actively both infront of them and behind them. That time not to say understanding arabic, I can't even read Quran at that time and I do things that you do include drinking alcohol, there many reason I being like this right now its been put as a process, one of them when I see in another side of opinion.

But the things is like Neomega say, today we are being load with information where anti-Islam non-muslim try to teach us what Islam is, while we never see a muslim point of view.

Why not you learn Islam from Muslim, I learn Christian from catholic I even from Catholic highschool. I learn Hindust by reading Narayan, the Book of Badgavat Githa and the epic of Viyasa almost most of it I read it. I learn budhist by learning the teaching of Huineng and Huike also many Zen practicer. why not you pick up Ibn Kathir or Ibn Qayyim or modern muslim scholar to learn about Islam? take example Charles Eaton, or you want to see a more "Islam" point of view? Listen Zakir Naik.

The best way is you heard both of side of opinion and follow the best of it, that is adl. But when you only heard another side of opinion, and alergic to the other side, that lead you nowhere from the truth.

Your pointing out strictly non-religious elements of life. Using a banking system has nothing to do with religion. I'm talking about things that actually have to do with religion such as the freedom to convert and not wearing a Hijab for women(there's a difference between the nun and a muslim woman in that the nun freely chooses to wear the veil and take stop being a nun anytime she wants) and also women being treated equally as men and being able to represent themselves equally in courts.

Your also not paying attention to the way many things are governed or done is the Islamic world. You'd really have to be blind if you believe that Islamic countries don't harshly discriminate against non-muslims that live there. Sure, they don't ban them but they're restricted in many facets of life and your not allowed to convert away from Islam.

Then you don't know about Shariah. Usury and bank system the sin is worst than incest in Islam. If you know about Shariah you will not speak that way. Economic system is one of the key center of Islamic law system.

Iran mostly not focus on Quran, as any of Shiah tradition Mulah is the canal of Quran, so they focusing on the fatwa of their mulah. But Arab Saudi, even the Saudi scholar themselves approve Saudi not an Islamic government.
 
The plight of women in Afghanistan says a lot:

The report focused primarily on the imprisonment of women who fled their homes to escape abusive situations. In almost all such instances, those responsible for the abuse did not face any legal actions, while the victims faced prison sentences.

afghan women jailed for moral crimes

Mind you, this is from the Guardian so probably just more simple-minded prejudice against Islam itself.
 
The plight of women in Afghanistan says a lot:



afghan women jailed for moral crimes

Mind you, this is from the Guardian so probably just more simple-minded prejudice against Islam itself.

Wuut? Have you read the Guardian? It's one of the most politically correct papers you can buy in your corner stop. It happily runs articles written by authors who've described non-muslims and athiessts as "cattle" and won't apologise for it. If anything it's in the bosom of the far-left pro-islamic movement.
 
Well, I'm not so sure.

Look how many trafficked sex workers there are. Look how women typically occupy part time low paid jobs. Look how many women there are in Parliament. Look at how much unpaid work is done by women. Etc.

You are joking right. Women are quite happy with their place in society, and do hold more power over men (just a word from them can get a man locked up for rape and sexual offender status). Women hold all the power in the U.S.

The examples you choose above are because women choose those things- aside from trafficked sex workers which is a criminal matter and therefore irrelevant.
 
Wuut? Have you read the Guardian? It's one of the most politically correct papers you can buy in your corner stop. It happily runs articles written by authors who've described non-muslims and athiessts as "cattle" and won't apologise for it. If anything it's in the bosom of the far-left pro-islamic movement.
Yes, that was a (kind of) joke.

You are joking right. Women are quite happy with their place in society, and do hold more power over men (just a word from them can get a man locked up for rape and sexual offender status). Women hold all the power in the U.S.

The examples you choose above are because women choose those things- aside from trafficked sex workers which is a criminal matter and therefore irrelevant.
No, my post wasn't a joke. Surely yours must be.
 
Oh no! Am I turning into an aspie internet user who cannot tell sarcasm? :(
 
An aspie! Noice!

Nonono, blame me, Quackers. I didn't signal it very well.
 
Back
Top Bottom