YOU FISH-SLAPPED ME!
I meant that you would be one of the 'Murican citizens not afraid to point out that invading Viet Nam is usually a sign of imperialistic behaviour.
Re: the bolded, hell yeah, we agree. And re: the unbolded, consensus is good, isn't it? What a pity that POTUS and soon SCOTUS will do their best to destroy consensus, both forwards and backwards.
I would call US involvement in Vietnam wrong. I would not call it imperialism. The US involvement in Vietnam was in defense of French imperialism, for the French demanded that we defend their imperialism there as the price of alliance in Europe. Which was damned %*$$%& stupid of the French. But DeGaul. Once the French gave up, it was all about opposing the commies. American domestic politics required opposing the commies. The US never intended to end up in control of Vietnam, only to deny the commies control of Vietnam.