We would have come up with the theory of evolution, anyway, too.Darwin. We would have reconquered the south eventually, anyway.
But a very significant fascist. Seriously, someone would have discovered evolution with or without Chuckie.A fascist vs. a scientist
Hmmm...
Wait, Florida went for Buchanan?Charles Darwin wins the popular vote, but Abraham Lincoln wins the Electoral College.
And once again, Florida screwed it up and voted for Buchanan and the result is a grey mess.
Surprisingly, the Southern United States chose Lincoln.
So, it's your opinion that Lincoln caused the Civil War? Please. Lincoln wasn't even an abolitionist. He just opposed it spreading to the west. It wasn't until the South seceded that he issued the Emancipation Proclamation.It may be true that most politicians would not be able to hold the Union together as well as Lincoln, but don't forget that he is also why it broke up in the first place.
Slave trading in the US had already been banned since 1808. Vermont abolished it outright in 1777. All the northern states had done so since 1804. How much longer do you think the rest of the country should have allowed the rich plantation owners to exploit fellow human beings so they could get richer?I like to think that abolition would have happened anyway and in a more peaceful manner that would inspire less racial hatred later on, although it might have taken a lot longer.
It may be true that most politicians would not be able to hold the Union together as well as Lincoln, but don't forget that he is also why it broke up in the first place. If he (or another abolitionist/free-spoiler) hadn't been elected then the southern states would not have succeeded, so the civil war would not have been fought.
Lincoln would be more significant for Americans in general.
Considering that most Americans don't believe in evolution, You're probably right.