So you admit that it is

logic to assume that, say, someone who committed a crime 20+ years ago will commit a crime today?
Well, the government is an organisation that, at best, encourages and coddles lying. The institution can be suspected, but each new person in the institution can be honest or dishonest. Previous ill deeds are not the moral responsibility of current members, even thought the institution has moral responsibility.
That's quite different from a specific person who has previously shown poor taste and whether they're likely to be criminal in the future. The same person continues the burden of previous deeds.
By comparison, the Biblical god is an entity that orders the slaughtering of babies and who orders women to sexually assault specific men. Ostensibly, if this same entity is around today, it continues to be the same odious entity that once tortured an entire nation's first born just to flex his muscles for a Pharaoh.
Compare that to, say, the Catholic Church. Historically, the CC has done some decently wicked things, such as encouraging the slaughter of apostates and heathen. However, that's a sin of the institution. There's no reason why we should predict current priests and bishops of wanting to encourage such barbarity. They're not responsible for those misdeeds, except to prevent their institution drifting that way again.