Lt. William Calley: "Sorry about My-Lai"

nonconformist

Miserable
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
18,740
Location
Canterbury
Vietnam massacre soldier 'sorry'

The US army officer convicted for his part in the notorious My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War has offered his first public apology, a US report says.

"There is not a day that goes by that I do not feel remorse for what happened," Lt William Calley was quoted as saying by the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer.

He was addressing a small group at a community club in Columbus, Georgia.

Calley, 66, was convicted on 22 counts of murder for the 1968 massacre of 500 men, women and children in Vietnam.

Cold blood

"I feel remorse for the Vietnamese who were killed, for their families, for the American soldiers involved and their families. I am very sorry," the former US platoon commander said on Wednesday.

He was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the killings in 1971. Then-US President Richard Nixon commuted his sentence to three years' house arrest.

But Calley insisted that he was only following orders, the paper reported.

He broke his silence after accepting a friend's invitation to speak at the weekly meeting of the Kiwanis Club, a US-based global voluntary organisation.

At the time of the killings, the US soldiers had been on a "search and destroy" mission to root out communist fighters in what was fertile Viet Cong territory.

Although the enemy was nowhere to be seen, the US soldiers of Charlie Company rounded up unarmed civilians and gunned them down.

When the story of My Lai was exposed, more than a year later, it tarnished the name of the US army and proved to be a turning point for public opinion about the Vietnam War.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8215556.stm

Thoughts? A healt-felt apology, or just pandering to public opinion?

And considering he was pardoned as soon as he was convicted, and lived out a nice and long life in freedom, do Americans have any right to lecture the British on the release of the alleged Lockerbie bomber?
 
Better late than never?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8215556.stm

Thoughts? A healt-felt apology, or just pandering to public opinion?

And considering he was pardoned as soon as he was convicted, and lived out a nice and long life in freedom, do Americans have any right to lecture the British on the release of the alleged Lockerbie bomber?
Americans have the "right" to "lecture" the British. Britons have the same "right" to "lecture" Americans.
 
It's been so long I doubt he'd be apologizing unless he meant it.
 
Yeah... sounds like a too late apology to be genuine. Most likely just some pandering to the public options, although I'm willing to give a small benefit of doubt because there seem to be no external factors that could influence his decision to apologize.
 
It's not much of an apology.

And where are all those Lockerbie vengeance fanatics hiding?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Calley

Calley was charged on September 5, 1969, with six specifications of premeditated murder for the deaths of 104 Vietnamese civilians near the village of My Lai, at a hamlet called Son My, more commonly called My Lai in the U.S. press. As many as 500 villagers, mostly women, children, infants and the elderly, had been systematically killed by American soldiers during a bloody rampage in 1968. If convicted, Calley could have faced the death penalty.

Calley's trial started on November 17, 1970. After deliberating for 79 hours, the jury convicted him on March 29, 1971, of the premeditated murder of 22 Vietnamese civilians. Testimony revealed that Calley had ordered the men of 1st Platoon, Company C, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry of the 23rd Infantry Division (Americal) to kill everyone in the village. Calley claimed he was following the orders of his immediate superior, Captain Ernest Medina. Whether this order was actually given is disputed; Medina was acquitted of all charges relating to the incident at a separate trial. On 31st March 1971, Calley was sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor.

Many in America were outraged by Calley's sentence; Georgia's governor Jimmy Carter instituted "American Fighting Man's Day" and asked Georgians to drive for a week with their lights on.[6] Indiana's governor asked all state flags to be flown at half-staff for Calley, and Utah's and Mississippi's governors also disagreed with the verdict.[6] The Arkansas, Kansas, Texas, New Jersey, and South Carolina legislatures requested clemency for Calley.[6] Alabama's governor George Wallace visited Calley in the stockade and requested that Nixon pardon him. 79% of Americans polled disagreed with Calley's verdict.[6]

On April 1, 1971, only a day after Calley was sentenced, U.S. President Richard Nixon ordered him transferred from prison to house arrest at Fort Benning, pending appeal. This leniency was protested against by Melvin Laird, the Secretary of Defense. The prosecutor, Aubrey Daniel wrote, "The greatest tragedy of all will be if political expedience dictates the compromise of such a fundamental moral principle as the inherent unlawfulness of the murder of innocent persons."[7] On August 20, 1971, the convening authority — the Commanding General of Fort Benning — reduced Calley's sentence to 20 years. The Army Court of Military Review affirmed both the conviction and sentence (46 C.M.R. 1131 (1973)). The Secretary of the Army reviewed the sentence and findings and approved both, but in a separate clemency action commuted confinement to ten years. On May 3, 1974, President Nixon notified the Secretary that he had reviewed the case and determined he would take no further action in the matter.

Ultimately, Calley served only three and a half years of house arrest in his quarters at Fort Benning. He petitioned the federal district court for habeas corpus on February 11, 1974, which was granted on September 25, 1974, along with his immediate release, by federal judge J. Robert Elliott. Judge Elliott found that Calley's trial had been prejudiced by pretrial publicity, denial of subpoenas of certain defense witnesses, refusal of the United States House of Representatives to release testimony taken in executive session of its My Lai investigation, and inadequate notice of the charges. (The judge had released Calley on bail on February 27, 1974, but an appeals court reversed it and returned Calley to army custody on June 13, 1974.)

Calley was sent to the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. At his release, the press eagerly awaited his arrival at the prison's South Gate, as promised by the prison commandant. Instead, at Calley's request, he was released at West Gate and taken directly to the Fort Leavenworth airfield, where his escort, an unnamed Georgia Congressman, had him flown home. The press were notified of his departure after the fact, much to the chagrin of the major news network reporters from Kansas City.

The Army appealed against Judge Elliott's decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and asked an appeals judge to stay Calley's immediate release, which was granted. However, the full Court upheld the release pending appeal and decided the entire court would hear the appeal (normally not done in the first instance). The Army won a reversal of Judge Elliott's habeas corpus grant and a reinstatement of the judgment of the courts martial, with 5 judges dissenting. (Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184, 9/10/1975). In a long and extremely detailed careful opinion, the reviewing court disagreed with Judge Elliott on the law and significantly on Elliott's scope of review of the courts martial proceedings. The Court noted that although by now Calley had been "paroled" from confinement by the Army, that did not moot the habeas corpus proceedings.
 
Can't say I think he's pandering since he wasn't prompted or even asked. It's kinda out of left field really.
 
he wasn't prompted or even asked.

That's why I'm giving him a benefit of doubt.
 
And considering he was pardoned as soon as he was convicted, and lived out a nice and long life in freedom, do Americans have any right to lecture the British on the release of the alleged Lockerbie bomber?

Americans have a long and juicy tradition of not punishing their war criminals enough. This doesn't mean that your decision to let the Libyan butcher out wasn't spineless, wrong, and utterly cynical.
 
Justice was not served. Justice was not served. JUSTICE WAS NOT SERVED AND JESUS HAS BEEN TURNING ON HIS CROSS SINCE THIS MASS-MURDERER WAS RELEASED!! PLEASE PEOPLE WHY WON'T YOU THINK OF THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS even though they are Vietnamese and not white!!!

There, the customary conservative response in a nutshell, as it was given in the Lockerbie thread.
 
So where is the moral outrage?
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8215556.stm

Thoughts? A healt-felt apology, or just pandering to public opinion?

And considering he was pardoned as soon as he was convicted, and lived out a nice and long life in freedom, do Americans have any right to lecture the British on the release of the alleged Lockerbie bomber?

Rofl. Oh wow, we cant say how wrong the Scots are now because we made our own idiot decsion 40 years ago.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. :rolleyes:

However, Calley wasnt ever given a heros welcome upon return unlike the guy in Libya.
 
Justice was not served. Justice was not served. JUSTICE WAS NOT SERVED AND JESUS HAS BEEN TURNING ON HIS CROSS SINCE THIS MASS-MURDERER WAS RELEASED!! PLEASE PEOPLE WHY WON'T YOU THINK OF THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS even though they are Vietnamese and not white!!!

There, the customary conservative response in a nutshell, as it was given in the Lockerbie thread.

Well, just to be clear, though I'm intrigued by his apology, my opinion of the man is one of which I wouldn't mind had he been executed.
 
However, Calley wasnt ever given a heros welcome upon return unlike the guy in Libya.

Browsing Wikipedia to look up this guy brings up an interesting paragraph.

Many in America were outraged by Calley's sentence; Georgia's governor Jimmy Carter instituted "American Fighting Man's Day" and asked Georgians to drive for a week with their lights on. Indiana's governor asked all state flags to be flown at half-staff for Calley, and Utah's and Mississippi's governors also disagreed with the verdict. The Arkansas, Kansas, Texas, New Jersey, and South Carolina legislatures requested clemency for Calley. Alabama's governor George Wallace visited Calley in the stockade and requested that Nixon pardon him. 79% of Americans polled disagreed with Calley's verdict.
 
Rofl. Oh wow, we cant say how wrong the Scots are now because we made our own idiot decsion 40 years ago.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. :rolleyes:

However, Calley wasnt ever given a heros welcome upon return unlike the guy in Libya.

Hugh Thompson, Jr. didn't get a hero's welcome either, instead coward, piece of . .. .. .. . Rep. Mendel Rivers wanted to court-martial and throw him in jail for doing the right thing. So don't try acting like America has some sort of high ground in releasing mass murders because frankly you guys really don't.
 
Well, just to be clear, though I'm intrigued by his apology, my opinion of the man is one of which I wouldn't mind had he been executed.

Yep, he deserved execution just like the Libyan guy.

I see hypocrites in the ones who would like to see Calley dead or in hard labor but welcome releasing the unapologetic Libyan terrorist.
 
Hugh Thompson, Jr. didn't get a hero's welcome either, instead coward, piece of . .. .. .. . Rep. Mendel Rivers wanted to court-martial and throw him in jail for doing the right thing. So don't try acting like America has some sort of high ground in releasing mass murders because frankly you guys really don't.

It's one thing though to release the mass murderers who fought on your side. Most countries do this, in the past they were considered heroes, as regrettable and wrong as that may be.

It is another thing, much more puzzling and certainly not the norm, to release a mass murderer "of the other side" who wasn't even fighting a war, just committing a rather random act of terrorism.
 
Yep, he deserved execution just like the Libyan guy.
Nobody "deserves" execution, especially if there is even the slightest doubt you may not have even committed the crimes. I see your fanaticism and hatred extends to state-sponsored killing. No big surprise there.
 
Back
Top Bottom