I'm saying you can go and find out pretty easily. Nobody can ascertain you making what is evidently a pretty bald-faced lie, as such, they're not comparable. One has evidence if you're willing to do a bit of legwork, one is a false equivalence from the offset.Not baseless, you're just refusing to say what's it based on. It's on you, as maker of the claim, to provide the proof, otherwise it's nor a valid argument. Else I could simply say you're Putin trying to mess with us, and expect others to accept it and treat you as such.
Anyhow, Akka was kind enough to call more people names:
This is what I said you'd be called if you said what you said about Israel, in the Russia thread. Akka even kindly related it to blindness explicitly for you (r.e. him quoting Kyriakos).Yeah, facts are facts. When someone claims something, gets plastered by facts that proves the exact opposite, and then go on to smugly proclaim that it proves him right, there is only three possibilities : he's blind, he's stupid or he's dishonest. I was being charitable here.
Y'all can justify it however you want. But you're the ones making this a race to the bottom, every time. Which is fine. Just don't get things in a twist when others start being uncharitable towards you. It's really that simple.
I'd have to post in the thread itself to do it justice. I'm keeping references very brief to do my best to keep to thread rules.I can't even begin to understand how one could not blame both sides actions there, but at least I now understand why you took that position in the Ukraine thread.
If you're alright with that, I'll tag you there?