That depends on how it is managed. Much of Japan's immediate problem is that its transportation system is messed up. But 200k people isn't that hard for a developed nation to move, provided you don't try and do it in just a day or 2.
So if the power lines do work, what exactly would happen? Like how would the damage be prevented exactly (like how do the power lines even manage to connect to a damaged structure) and what damage or radiation spread would this be unable to fix?
The CNN nuclear power expert thinks it is highly ominous that the top US reactor official stated that US citizens, including the US military, should stay at least 50 miles away, contrary to the policy of the Japanese government which is claiming the danger zone is confined to 12 miles. He thinks it likely means that there is extremely high radiation from contaminants being spread into the atmosphere from fires from exposed fuel rods at the #4 reactor spent fuel pond.
That doesn't explain why the US military is currently banned from even going inside the same sized area.That's 80 KM, or four times the current evacuation zone of 20 KM that they've established. There where 200.000 people evacuated within that area, and you can just imagine how many reside within the greater area -- It would probably be prohibitively difficult to perform such an evacuation. The few US citizens however in that zone is probably very manageable to evacuate.
Right...I actually think more people would die from the evacuation than the potential total fatalities from the worst case fallout![]()
The chief of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Wednesday that all the water is gone from one of the spent fuel pools at Japan's most troubled nuclear plant. But Japanese officials denied it.
"There is no water in the spent fuel pool and we believe that radiation levels are extremely high, which could possibly impact the ability to take corrective measures," NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko said.
If NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko was correct, this would mean there was nothing to stop the fuel rods from heating and ultimately melting down. The outer shell of the rods could also ignite with enough force to propel the radioactive fuel inside over a wide area, widening the potential reach of any nuclear fallout.
That doesn't explain why the US military is currently banned from even going inside the same sized area.
Right...
Just heard on CNN. Chairman of the NRC: "We believe there is no water in the spent fuel pool".
Why don't they roll a prefabricated cover in there and cover up the rods? Or they could do a Chernobyl-style pile of boron and concrete on top of the rods.
You mean like there wasn't with the massive evacuation for the impending tsunami? And they only had an hour instead of days.What I'm telling is that there will be fatalities connected to a mass evacuation on a scale of multiple millions trying to get out at the same time.
You mean like there wasn't with the massive evacuation for the impending tsunami?
All the talk of rain being the worst thing to worry about in the case of fallout isn't helping my paranoia; it seems Spring and Summer are Vegas' monsoon seasons. Damnit all.
Hope they can get this chaos under control. We need some sort of cannon that can shoot water in a pressurised line like 100 miles.
Now most of Tokyo's residents either fled or are staying indoors, so I guess they're taking whatever precautions necessary, no matter what the government says.
You mean why evacuate to 50 miles as the leading acknowledged expert in the US insists?How bad can the multiple meltdown/burning of spent fuel rods get?
You are right. They should just listen to laymen. They obviously know far more about the inherent dangers of having fuel rods completely exposed to the atmosphere than the head of the NRC does.Yeah, but it wasn't a chance that the tsunami somehow wouldn't show up. As long as there's men in white coats telling the politicians that it will be contained they will have two equations to consider instead of the singular one with the tsunami.
It's all down to risk management again. And the Japanese are actually very very skilled at those things.
You mean why evacuate to 50 miles as the leading acknowledged expert in the US insists?
You are right. They should just listen to laymen. They obviously know far more about the inherent dangers of having fuel rods completely exposed to the atmosphere than the head of the NRC does.
Life being normal in Tokyo doesn't mean everything's safe in Tokyo, at least when considering what might happen in the very near future