Mideast News Thread

ReindeerThistle

Zimmerwald Left
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Messages
3,049
Location
Brooklyn, USA.
I am loathe to call the region the "Mideast," but for lack of a better term, I will go with this. I am starting this thread so that CFCers can share news that they have heard and seen about the goings on in North Africa, Western and Central Asia and the Persian Gulf regions.

Any CFCers and I most welcome CFCers from those regions (and I think first of Novakart), are welcome to post pics and news of all kinds of what is going on, either first-hand or from news sources.

I would like to keep the discussion civil, hence the [RD], but I welcome questions and discussion of the topics and articles and items posted.

I am especially interested in anything that is not mainstream media, and stories not widely disseminated outside of the the region.

Here's a gem my NGO-running friend and comrade found for us:

US Observers Report on Syrian Election at U.N. (UPDATED: full video) ~ The Press Conference the United Nations doesn’t want you to see (please, spread among your American friends)

A group of Americans, who observed the Syrian presidential election first hand, reported at the United Nations on what they witnessed.~ As a group, they described the election in Syria as successful, free and transparent.~ They also called for an end to foreign support for anti-Damascus mercenary terrorist.

June 19, 2014 at 11am:
the Syrian Mission to the United Nations convened a press conference featuring people from the US who observed the recent elections.

Five minutes into the opening comments of Syrian Ambassador Bashar Al-Jaafari, the UN webcast cut off. The thousands of journalists, political analysts, and others who view UN webcasts each day from all over the world were denied the ability to watch the press conference, and hear what was said.

This is not the first time this has happened when Bashar Jaafari is speaking. This occurred on June 7th earlier this year, and on numerous occasions throughout 2013. Reporters at Inner City Press reported that this is not accidental, but was ordered by Michele DuBach, Acting Deputy Director-News & Media Operations.

This comes in the context of other UN harassment of Syria. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon has met with Ahmad Jarba, a leader of violent insurgent groups in Syria, but has refused to meet with Bashar Jaafari. Though Syria pays over $1 million to the UN each year, it is not being treated as an equal member state.

Watch the important, UN Press Conference about Syria, that someone obviously doesn’t want you, or anyone else, to see:


Link to video.
 
Thanks RT.
 
...

Any CFCers and I most welcome CFCers from those regions (and I think first of Novakart), are welcome to post pics and news of all kinds of what is going on, either first-hand or from news sources.
...
I am especially interested in anything that is not mainstream media, and stories not widely disseminated outside of the the region.

Here's a gem my NGO-running friend and comrade found for us:
...
Since you've asked for anything outside of mainstream media and found "a gem" of your own - wouldn't it be interesting and more transparent to hear where the poster's affiliations lie? It doesn't mean you actively support something or some group, but if the purpose of this thread is to offer some alternative perspective from the mainstream, it would help to know, for example, if you believe the Syrian regime is the rightful ruler of Syria or if you believe it should be overthrown.

I've got no news to post, but if I do henceforth - Groups like ISIS are the largest threats to the region. Otherwise I don't care who rules what. Stability under authority is better than Islamisation, if that is what it takes.
 
It's not like what you described is hardly news to anyone following the story. The problem is that for some reason the President of the United States is the one supporting the terrorists and almost got America to fight for them, except for a huge backlash against that.
 
@Loppan: everybody knows who and what I am. My purpose is in getting news that others may be missing. My Syria story was blacked out in the MSM.

I don't want this to turn into an.ideological debate... Though I would like people to question what they read, hear or see. Even what they see here.
 
@Loppan: everybody knows who and what I am. My purpose is in getting news that others may be missing. My Syria story was blacked out in the MSM.

I don't want this to turn into an.ideological debate... Though I would like people to question what they read, hear or see. Even what they see here.
I get this and you may disregard my request for transparency. My point is that anyone can dig up obscure or legitimate sources, but it's most often done with a purpose. This conflict don't have any credible sides left imo. I know some of who you are, but I'm not sure where you stand regarding Syria. There are leftys on both sides. Anyway, I'll leave it at this.
 
I'm in Iraq but I wouldn't say I'm necessarily better informed than other members for news outside of the Kurdish region. The major way that it's effected Kurdistan is with the acquisition of Kirkuk (which I don't really have much firsthand knowledge of) and the fuel problems. One of my friends has gone there recently with the PUK security forces so maybe I can find out more from himlater.

There are enormous lines outside the gas stations, have to be seen to be believed really. Strangely enough, it hasn't effected taxi prices much yet. They've gone up a couple of dollars but not that bad. People are going out at 5:30 in the morning and still finding the lines too long.

One of my friends is Ashuri (Iraqi Christian) and his wife is from Mosul but has been living in Kurdistan for the past several years. She mentioned how a couple of Ashuri nuns were kidnapped, one of them she knew but fortunately they were rescued. Sometimes I'll hear little things like this from people who were there but that's about it.
 
I get this and you may disregard my request for transparency. My point is that anyone can dig up obscure or legitimate sources, but it's most often done with a purpose. This conflict don't have any credible sides left imo. I know some of who you are, but I'm not sure where you stand regarding Syria. There are leftys on both sides. Anyway, I'll leave it at this.

I am not taking "sides," except to call into question anything the US Press (and other Western (read Bourgeois) media sources say about the "black and white" of any development in the Mideast.

As the Press Conference clip pointed out, the Syrians are tired of the war, but are overwhelmingly in favor of the government. If the US and EU (who were prepared to launch cruise missiles not too long ago) are truly interested in democracy, they will accept this.
 
Checkmate, USN.

Iran capable of sinking giant US carriers: IRGC Navy commander said:
Wed Feb 25, 2015 6:50PM

A senior commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) says the Iranian Navy can sink the giant US aircraft carriers if they pose a threat to Iran's maritime interests, Press TV reports.

Rear Admiral Ali Fadavi, commander of the IRGC Navy, said Wednesday that Iranian vessels will have no difficulty targeting state-of-the-art aircraft carriers operated by the US Marine Corps if any battle erupts in the future.

Fadavi made the remarks in an interview with Press TV after his forces in the IRGC Navy started a major drill in the Persian Gulf waters south of Iran earlier in the day.

The drill, code-named the Great Prophet 9, saw nearly 400 rounds of 107-millimeter missiles strike a huge model of a US aircraft carrier, showing the capability of the IRGC Navy in countering potential threats posed by the enemies.

During the interview, Fadavi elaborated on the message of IRGC's drill, saying such maneuvers are assuring for Iran's friends and intimidating for enemies.

"…Our enemies should rest assured that they will never ever be able to win any possible battle against Iranians … (and) our friends … can use the capabilities of Iran and of the IRGC as a role model," Fadavi said.


The Iranian admiral further highlighted the significance of the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf region and described it as "the most strategic and sensitive part in the world," over which Iran has full control.

The energy security of the world depends on the Strait of Hormuz, he said, adding that Iran is closely monitoring the developments in the area and other countries should rest assured that the Islamic Republic can guarantee the security of the strategic waterway.

He further criticized the United States for fueling insecurity and instability in the Persian Gulf region by sending its warships and weaponry to the area over the past few years.

"Americans have been present in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz under the pretext of ensuring energy security, but according to the figures and statistics, they have brought only great insecurity rather than security," said the Iranian commander.

Fadavi cited data relating to the number of vessels attacked in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, saying that all these attacks happened in the presence of US warships in Persian Gulf waters.

"If the Americans had not come here, the number of vessels targeted would have been eight times less than what really happened," he said.

The first phase of the IRGC drill concluded on Wednesday with a parade of marine units and speedboats. The military maneuvers will continue Thursday with IRGC Ground Force units conducting special exercises in the east of the Strait of Hormuz.

Various types of aircraft, drones, manned and unmanned aerial vehicles will be also tested on the second day of the drill.

Iran routinely conducts drills to enhance the defense capabilities of its armed forces and to test modern military tactics and equipment. The Islamic Republic has repeatedly said that its military might poses no threat to other countries, reiterating that its defense doctrine is based on deterrence.

MS/HMV/SS
 
I am not taking "sides," except to call into question anything the US Press (and other Western (read Bourgeois) media sources say about the "black and white" of any development in the Mideast.

As the Press Conference clip pointed out, the Syrians are tired of the war, but are overwhelmingly in favor of the government.

This is not news - it was publicized in the bourgeois media months ago.

If the US and EU (who were prepared to launch cruise missiles not too long ago) are truly interested in democracy, they will accept this.

Source missing. (Possibly because none exists.)

I suggest you keep to your own standards and publish news not unfounded opinion.
 
You guys catch Netentyahu's speech to US congress? Sure sounds like if Iran ever gets a confirmed nuke that Israel will strike first.

I'm fairly convinced at this point a nuclear Iran is going to lead to ww3 in some fashion.
 
You guys catch Netentyahu's speech to US congress? Sure sounds like if Iran ever gets a confirmed nuke that Israel will strike first.

I doubt that it will be so certain. There is quite some opposition from Israel against a strike on Iran, although the opposition primarily comes from noted establishment figures rather than popular opinion.
 
Israel-Russia relations are closer than I thought.
Netanyahu to Visit Moscow Over Concerns About Russian Moves in Syria said:
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel plans to travel to Russia next week for talks with President Vladimir V. Putin about the stationing of Russian forces in Syria, Mr. Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on Wednesday.

“Prime Minister Netanyahu will present the threats posed to Israel as a result of the increased flow of advanced war matériel to the Syrian arena,” the statement said. Among those threats, it said, are the possible transfer of weapons to Hezbollah, the Lebanese organization, and other militant groups fighting in Syria that are hostile to Israel.

Russia has sent some of its most modern battle tanks and other military equipment and personnel to an air base in Syria, in what American officials have said is part of a buildup that could give Moscow a more significant military foothold in the Middle East.


Pentagon officials have said that the Kremlin may be planning to turn the airfield, south of Latakia in western Syria, into a major hub. Such a base could be used to funnel military supplies to the government of President Bashar al-Assad, and perhaps as a staging area for airstrikes in support of his forces.

Russia has backed Mr. Assad throughout the Syrian civil war, now in its fifth year. The new airfield is near the Assad family’s ancestral home.

The buildup is adding to frictions between Russia and the United States, which has demanded for years that Mr. Assad give up power. Russia contends that the Syrian government is the only force that can defeat the Islamic State extremists, while the United States has tried to support rival insurgent groups and has led a campaign of airstrikes against the Islamic State.

Israel, a strategic ally of the United States, maintains good bilateral relations with Russia, but Israeli and Russian interests in the Middle East differ. Israel has said that while it will not take sides in the Syrian civil war, it will act to prevent the transfer of advanced weapons to Hezbollah, a longtime enemy of Israel that is supporting Mr. Assad in the fighting.

There have been more than a half-dozen airstrikes in Syria against cargos of weapons that appeared to have been bound for Hezbollah. The strikes have been attributed to Israel, but Israel refuses to confirm or deny that it was responsible.

Against this background, Israeli experts said they expected Israel and Russia to seek ways to avoid coming into direct confrontation in Syria, while Israel would try to ensure its freedom of action in the region.

“Netanyahu wants to understand what the Russians’ plans are, how far they will go and how it will affect Israel’s interests,” said Zvi Magen, a former Israeli ambassador to Russia who is now at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. “If Russia were to try to get in the way of Israeli actions meant to prevent weapons transfers to Hezbollah,” he said, Russia and Israel “could find themselves in conflict.”

On the other hand, Mr. Magen said, the Russians may feel more comfortable coming to understandings with Israel than with the United States.

A former Israeli security official, who was speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the diplomacy, said it was important for Israel and Russia to have understandings and open lines of communications. The former official said that Hezbollah and its patron, Iran, might try to exploit the Russian presence in Syria as a protective “umbrella,” perhaps believing that Israel will hesitate to strike too close to Russian installations for fear of becoming entangled with Russian forces or hitting them by mistake.
 
Which advanced matériel? There are none.
meeting.gif
 
Israel-Russia relations are closer than I thought.

That basically is telling the exact opposite. Israel has remained entirely neutral with regard to Syria (for rather obvious reasons). Increased Russian support for the Assad regime may have a harmful effect on Israel's 'neutrality' policy. Naturally this raises concern in Israel.
 
Actually I'm wondering why Russia seems to give a damn what the Israeli PM has to say, given that Israel is probably the biggest ally of the US in the Middle East.
 
Because although the U.S. tends to almost work exclusively in Israel's interest (though not always the case), Israel doesn't always work towards U.S. interest. They are a sovereign state after all.
 
Back
Top Bottom