Truronian said:
Meh, Christianity has been spread mainly by conquest.
Europe: Spread by the Romans
Americas: Spread by the conquering Europeans
Africa: Spread by colonial Europeans
The only difference is Islam was spread by Arabs while Christianity was spread by Europeans.
I wonder when will people stop excusing evil by pointing at the fact, that someone other has done that too
Europe: Christianity spread peacefuly throughout the Roman Empire. After its fall, the 'barbarians' converted to Christianity without coercion. Then, Christians had to defend themselves from Muslims, who attacked Byzantine Empire
without provocation, only because they wanted to spread their faith. Then, they attacked Spain and conquered it. Fortunately, Charles Martel stopped their onslaught in the Battle of Tours (Poitiers). Muslims then expanded to the East and tried to destroy Byzantines (fortunately, they managed to hold them back long enough for the rest of Europe to develop.
America: you can hardly say that the main motivator was Christianity. Spain surely wanted to spread it, but the main motivator of overseas expansion was trade and gold (silver). Besides, the Mesoamerican beliefs were much more violent that the christian conquiastadors, so I don't know if we can blame them for putting an end to their mass sacrifices of prisoners.
Africa: when did Europeans exterminate some faith by force in Africa? They spread their faith, but not by force.
If you compare Christianity and Islam with regard to using violence as a tool for expansion, you have to come to conclusion, that Islam is much more violent in that respect. Islam practically wiped out Zoroastrianism in Persia, Orthodox Christianity in Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa, attempted to destroy Hinduism in India and Catholic Christianity in Western Europe. This expansion was motivated almost exclusively by their religious zeal.