Mise
isle of lucy
Thing is, this is very almost what happens, with a few things tweaked and a lot of things removed. If it was indeed beneficial to tweak and/or remove those things, don't you think it would have already happened by now?
1. It's pointless: If I wanted to do those things I could already do them.
2. It's restrictive: It removes avenues of investment, and puts limits on what I can do with my money.
3. It promotes consumption over investment: If the government wanted to promote consumption, it could lower interest rates. AFAIK, the US's personal savings' rate is far too low, so this would probably cause problems.
1. It's pointless: If I wanted to do those things I could already do them.
2. It's restrictive: It removes avenues of investment, and puts limits on what I can do with my money.
3. It promotes consumption over investment: If the government wanted to promote consumption, it could lower interest rates. AFAIK, the US's personal savings' rate is far too low, so this would probably cause problems.