New Version - 3.7.12 (August 4, 2023)

[saamohod]

But right now it's pretty much "spend everything you can get your hands on", so there's no real reason to sell excess.

There is no real reason to sell excess strategics in mid-late game because it's too cheap to bother.

 

[JNZS13]

So... load a game = ctd?

 

[CppMaster]

There is no real reason to sell excess strategics in mid-late game because it's too cheap to bother.

Yeah, a mod mod would be nice to make it more convenient/quicker, just like there is one for civ6.

 

[usadefcon1]

Speaking of excess strategics... (Taken on turn 360 from v3.5)

Spoiler Uranium Price :

 

[CppMaster]

Speaking of excess strategics... (Taken on turn 360 from v3.5)

Spoiler Uranium Price :

View attachment 665907

He doesn't like you very much, does he?

 

[usadefcon1]

He doesn't like you very much, does he?

He's my vassal!

 

[azum4roll]

He's my vassal!

But does he like you?

 

[demondance]

Does this version fix customized Great General/Admiral can't be spawned?

If it doesn't, can anyone provide a guide how to fix it?

Thanks

 

[saamohod]

But does he like you?

I don't think it matters.
3 gpt for a strategic is seen by AI as a normal price, regardless of era.
Here's Information era, my old ally:

My friendly vassals give me even less than that.

 

[Rosete]

I think it is fine that the AI values strategic that low. I often find myself with a lot of iron/horse. If the AI value those at 5 or even 10 gpt, that'd be way too high because AI don't often decline trade offers. The AI will always buy your spare strategic from you, making the game very unbalanced in favor of the human player.

 

[usadefcon1]

I think it is fine that the AI values strategic that low. I often find myself with a lot of iron/horse. If the AI value those at 5 or even 10 gpt, that'd be way too high because AI don't often decline trade offers. The AI will always buy your spare strategic from you, making the game very unbalanced in favor of the human player.

If the AI values strategics low, that's fine but then don't ask me for them.

The AI should only be asking me for them if it needs them, and if so, the price should be appropriate for wanting them.

 

[AndreyK]

When I get CS quest to conquer another CS or ally them both, I usually go for second option. As I find out, first CS that I ally, always gives half of reward. Second CS, it depends on how I become ally to it, if with emissary/envoy then it also gives half of reward. But if you complete another quest and become ally, then you get reward for that quest, but not for allying both CSs.

So I have question - if I have multiple quests from one CS, and complete 2 or more quests in the same turn, will I get reward only for one quest?

 

[Recursive]

Version 3.7.4 released. Link in OP has been updated.

Changelog:

- Fixed bugs with Diplomacy AI's "backstabber flag" incorrectly being called for approach selection, incorrectly being cleared for AI players with Loyalty <= 2 if the *other* player had Loyalty > 2
- Removed minor information cheat where Diplomacy AI would be able to detect a dead player was ingame if they could see a plot adjacent to a conquered city, but not the conquered city itself
- Merged (4a) Promotion Icons for VP mod into (2) Vox Populi - even fewer clicks; thanks N. Core!
- Renamed (4b) UI - Promotion Tree for VP to (4a) UI - Promotion Tree for VP, and also converted it into .civ5proj format (makes it buildable & easier to edit)
- Deleted CargoShipMod.sql from the repository as it was unused and just taking up space

Online as of 3:06 PM CST. Should be savegame compatible with 3.7 versions.

 

[andersw]

Didnt expect Authority > Statecraft Denmark but it was a bit scary I say.
With Aztecs and Zulu non agressive AI's getting curb stomped.

 

[usadefcon1]

- Renamed (4b) UI - Promotion Tree for VP to (4a) UI - Promotion Tree for VP, and also converted it into .civ5proj format (makes it buildable & easier to edit)

Is there a need for the "a"?

Sorry to nitpick.

 

[azum4roll]

Well there could be a (4b), (4c) later on when we want to include some more optional mods.

 

[Recursive]

Well there could be a (4b), (4c) later on when we want to include some more optional mods.

Yes and as someone lazy I want to prepare for that in advance.

 

[usadefcon1]

Well there could be a (4b), (4c) later on when we want to include some more optional mods.

I just thought (5) would come after (4) but it's a total nitpick. Thanks for all the amazing work.

 

[Siegfroh]

The tooltip for envoys seems to be incorrect: their missions do not grant gold:

 

[Enginseer]

The tooltip for envoys seems to be incorrect: their missions do not grant gold:

View attachment 666085

Trade Hub doesn't sound right?