Sorry typo. I am asking you to think about it further.
oh. I thought you were saying your read of me changed based on that post, which is what I found scummy about you. I take that back.
I still don't know how that makes him town, ignoring any meta arguments.
I think the reaction to votes is null at worst for now FWIW (AFAICT Tak is always reactive to votes on him, and was perhaps moreso in Rappers where he was Town than Snakes where he was maf).
Why do you say 'his entire world'? Considering Tak has actually been questioning and providing views on other players/events it makes the whole thing seem rather opportunistic imo.
Look at his votes and the reasoning behind them. He is hyper-concerned with getting lynch votes off himself. His ATPG read was entirely based on whether or not Pizza was voting him (voting Tak ---> scum must die; unvote Tak ---> town hero).
Why are your thoughts/opinions/reasoning on each of the last (bold) actions? - And why did you leave the reasons out?
good luck, I've been trying to get reasons out of him with no response other than smug deflections
addendum: oh gee he actually responded
Strange question IMO. How are the two of you at all similar/related?
Should be obvious, go look at eod yesterday. Plenty of other people have pointed out this connection, it's pretty much the whole reason anyone is voting for me or auto.
3. How many games have you played with Zack as Town/Scum? How confident are you in your ability to read him?
Sprig (and Visor) would both tell you they are good at reading me. What this really means is that at some point they will conclude I am scum with varying degree of certainty
p).
FWIW the bold at least is generally how Town!Dice hunts those he thinks are scum. Gut read on something that stands out, followed by obstinate vote...
fwiw that's not a good way to actually find scum
Zack, can you link me to a recent game where you played Town?
I can give you a rundown of games of note later. I doubt you'll want to read through all of them, and I'm not sure how helpful reading through a single game will be, as my playstyle isn't always consistent from game to game.
Zack - is possibly scummy for his jumping on Tak and Dice. ?Opportunistic with Tak and seems overly reactive to Dice's pushing. Also ?fits the deflect/discredit meta. Need to know if Zack also does this when coming under suspicion as Town.
Overly reactive how? Go back and read what I was saying, I was asking him to explain himself (he refused) and pushing my own case on him. In fact, I ignored him d1.
How does this fit the deflect/discredit meta? Find me a specific instance, preferably multiple.
Well he's being awfully quiet. But I can be persuaded otherwise if you've got something better?
So? Being quiet doesn't mean he is scum.
I could see a w/w connection between zack and dice, based on their interactions.
there is one wolf there, i'll give you that
Hello, Lady Weston-Hogues. My, everybody seems to be very interested in little old me. I'm hardly a premier member of the Order, but I'm no Varethite.
KingMorgan, you say the case on me is thin, and yet you're still coming after me? That sounds like a Varethite trying to have things both ways.
Can we hear more from you and your thoughts? You're probably getting lynched today.
the way zack did that whole quote from another game felt off. like he was waiting to use it
For the record, I was not around the ~15 or so hours leading up until about 15 minutes before the deadline, so I was trying to think quickly. Not really any time to prepare. Why would I wait, anyways, and what makes that suspicious?
I saw Pizza (iirc) mention an early post spaceman made in this game was scummy, which reminded me of the recent game where he was lynched d1 as scum, where I found an extremely similar post to the one atpg was taking issue with, and I thought it was a good connection.
. Dice's early snap at Zack also consistent Town meta IMO but
