Download the torrent dude, look the emails yourself. There IS A CONSPIRACY, the emails make it blatantly obvious.
First of all, the OP states there are about a thousand of emails, and you sit on your lazy butt and expect me to bother my way through getting a torrenting program, waiting for the seeding to finish and then look until I have sufficient information to prove you wrong? You being here talking with me doesn't involve posting links as arguments. The thing you are trying to shove down my throat now is actually worse since I actually have to get a program designated to read thousands of emails because you're apparently too convinced from them to bother otherwise.
Please tell me what the hell you are trying to prove.
As having been said, none of the sources are trustable, the argument in itself is hilarious at first as well.
Also, to be noted, there is no reason whatsoever for a scientist to risk his reputation and spend his ability on time on
conspiracies.
Note that as a general rule, conspiracies don't exist. The simple reason being that the profit gained from it is always much easier acquired through normal means - the bigger the profit (Which depends on the conspiracy's size, you know), the harder it is for the conspirator to hide. I mean, e-mails. Here's what's written in the article about the emails:
"Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more."
This could just as easily have come from an e-mail which said
___
"Hi John.
The data didn't prove to be as sufficient as we expected, so I'm afraid it isn't accurate enough to go public. Instead publish the good results we got last week from the thermographic experiment, the other thing is a dead end. Get rid of it and delete it, thanks. Oh, and if Bob asks, tell him you lost the documents, not that it was a failure. I don't want to spend a whole night being humiliated by his postulates about the AGW apparently nonexistent.
See you, Tim."
___
I don't imagine a scientist sitting with an evil laughter, happy that he has convinced the world that global warming was a fact, resulting in them knowing something that isn't true.
Finally, this "conspiracy" doesn't ever prove global warming wrong; especially since you might consider there are plenty of other scientists that are still very certain it is happening.
To conclude; the thing is, they don't have any reason to conspire. They're freaking scientists.
You know, I did make a perfectly fine thread about another conspiracy here on CFC the other day, perhaps you could pay that a visit and become further enlightened.