Winner
Diverse in Unity
Keep these videos coming. Europeans need to be constantly reminded just how insane the US politicians are so that they can better cope with the ones who rule their countries 

So apparently if you support DADT you are the world's biggest bigot
Would you have opposed de-segregation in the military? Afterall, both DADT and segregation in the military are bigoted, outdated, immoral and frankly idiotic.
I don't see how that is a liberal argument - in fact, not to get too elitist with my research skills, but it seems the writer is actually a conservative. A review of her contributions includes an article that starts out with:here is a liberal argument against repealing DADT:
http://voices.yahoo.com/why-lifting-dont-ask-dont-tell-policy-might-not-5656838.html
If the United States takes on this health care policy the US is certainly in for disaster.
If the government chooses how much our doctors get paid it will certainly drive down the desire to be a Doctor let alone become one.
Tougher gun laws do not make much of a difference to criminals. Does it really matter if we ban weapons? When it comes right down to it a criminal does not pay attention to any old laws let alone new laws passed concerning weapons.
The truth is the government can pass as many laws as they want banning assault weapons, they can ban hand guns, tell us to take this test or that test before we can own a weapon, what difference does it make.
Yet discriminating against LGBTers is perfectly fine? That's pretty inconsistent given neither race nor sexuality is a choice.
Do you think you can be coverted from heterosexuality to homosexuality?there is a way out of homosexuality:
http://narth.com/2011/10/2061/
there is a way out of homosexuality:
http://narth.com/2011/10/2061/
Do you think you can be coverted from heterosexuality to homosexuality?
yes, but why would I want to?
Reread that and think about it it for a while.yes, but why would I want to?
First, the average change in sexual orientation was modest
Second, participants who had begun the change process prior to the start of the study appeared to have disproportionately positive outcomes compared to participants inducted into the study early in their pursuit of change. This may indicate that some weeding-out of individuals who were not successful in changing sexual orientation occurred in the time between the onset of pursuit of change and the initial collection of data.
A third limitation is the relatively small sample size, which makes any generalization of these findings to the population of individuals pursuing SOCE tentative.
Yet discriminating against LGBTers is perfectly fine? That's pretty inconsistent given neither race nor sexuality is a choice.