Rashiminos
Fool Prophet
An article to motivate discussion:
*This article and the following question are somewhat US centric. Feel free to provide relevant context for other regions.
What sort of minor illness reporting policy would CFC posters consider to be a fair balance between encouraging employees to stay home when they are sick while serving to discourage unwarranted "sick time" (ab)use?
IMO, asking for professional verification for every minor incident is tantamount to asking (some) employees to come in sick. The employee would have arrange an appointment and transportation on short notice (especially if they are not fit to transport themselves), and then pay a cost to a health care provider. The employee already know s/he is sick beforehand. An employee who is capable of getting that verification is also capable of getting to work (and attempting to be productive). If the employee had a less stringent choice (just staying home for a short period, ie a day), they would make that choice instead.
It might seem more reasonable to have such a requirement if:
-We have a large system of 'qualified' (formal) professionals that routinely made housecalls for this purpose
-The cost of this operation was free or nearly so, at least to the employee (subsidized health care anyone?)
*This article and the following question are somewhat US centric. Feel free to provide relevant context for other regions.
http://www.employmentandlaborinside...-note-for-all-sick-calls-you-must-be-kidding/
One common employer practice that I have never liked is requiring employees who call in sick to bring in a doctor's note. I'm not talking about extended or recurring absences that would be covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act, or time off that would be covered under a short-term or long-term disability policy, or requests for reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
..
What sort of minor illness reporting policy would CFC posters consider to be a fair balance between encouraging employees to stay home when they are sick while serving to discourage unwarranted "sick time" (ab)use?
IMO, asking for professional verification for every minor incident is tantamount to asking (some) employees to come in sick. The employee would have arrange an appointment and transportation on short notice (especially if they are not fit to transport themselves), and then pay a cost to a health care provider. The employee already know s/he is sick beforehand. An employee who is capable of getting that verification is also capable of getting to work (and attempting to be productive). If the employee had a less stringent choice (just staying home for a short period, ie a day), they would make that choice instead.
It might seem more reasonable to have such a requirement if:
-We have a large system of 'qualified' (formal) professionals that routinely made housecalls for this purpose
-The cost of this operation was free or nearly so, at least to the employee (subsidized health care anyone?)