Presenteeism: Encouraging Sick Workers to Come in

Rashiminos

Fool Prophet
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
6,906
Location
The Border.
An article to motivate discussion:

*This article and the following question are somewhat US centric. Feel free to provide relevant context for other regions.

http://www.employmentandlaborinside...-note-for-all-sick-calls-you-must-be-kidding/

One common employer practice that I have never liked is requiring employees who call in sick to bring in a doctor's note. I'm not talking about extended or recurring absences that would be covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act, or time off that would be covered under a short-term or long-term disability policy, or requests for reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
..

What sort of minor illness reporting policy would CFC posters consider to be a fair balance between encouraging employees to stay home when they are sick while serving to discourage unwarranted "sick time" (ab)use?

IMO, asking for professional verification for every minor incident is tantamount to asking (some) employees to come in sick. The employee would have arrange an appointment and transportation on short notice (especially if they are not fit to transport themselves), and then pay a cost to a health care provider. The employee already know s/he is sick beforehand. An employee who is capable of getting that verification is also capable of getting to work (and attempting to be productive). If the employee had a less stringent choice (just staying home for a short period, ie a day), they would make that choice instead.

It might seem more reasonable to have such a requirement if:

-We have a large system of 'qualified' (formal) professionals that routinely made housecalls for this purpose
-The cost of this operation was free or nearly so, at least to the employee (subsidized health care anyone?)
 
What country are you in? American companies usually accept a phone call as proof and keep a tally of your sick days.

I've been frequently told not to come to work sick, as why spread it to the rest of the staff?
 
A "doctor's note" was always demanded when I called out sick. Yet, I never produced one and none of my employers ever made a fuss about it.

You don't go to a doctor when you have a sinus infection or stomach virus and my doctor's office was closed every other day including the weekend. If my employers want to foot the bill for an ER visit then I'd be happy to produce a doctor's note.

But I'm not 12 years old. I'm an adult. If you can't take my word for it then why'd you hire me in the first place?
 
I've worked in both environments, in the USA and abroad.
It comes down to staffing, often times. If the company is poorly staffed, they want to discourage calling off... rather than hiring extra staff to cover such contingencies.

To me it is a difference between a company that sucks, and one that doesn't... if you are treated like a dirtbag for calling off, there is a bad vibe coming from leadership about it.

I think, you get more of this negative approach in America, as in my experience, European companies tend to care more about their people as people as opposed to assets. This is highly subjective though.
 
We should be trying harder to encourage sick people to stay away. We don't need sick notes here, but people are still rated on their number of sick days. If other people sneeze on me, why should I be ranked lower?
If a company wants to use sick days as ranking, it should expect me to come in with any sickness that doesn't immobilise me, whether or not it's contagious.
 
My sister works for a large Canadian company and all she gets is 4 sick days.. however, they are bundled with her vacation days - so when she uses a sick day she is essentially losing a vacation day.

The result? People don't call in sick.. ever.. unless they're basically so sick that they couldn't come in anyway (i.e. it is something really serious).

And what happens? The germs spread and everyone in the office ends up getting sick. It's a ridiculous way to do business - it lowers morale AND productivity.

I would never work for an employer that did this. When I get sick I stay at home.. and I expect the same courtesy from my office mates. My vacation days are separate from my sick days, the way it should be.
 
My sister works for a large Canadian company and all she gets is 4 sick days.. however, they are bundled with her vacation days - so when she uses a sick day she is essentially losing a vacation day.

The result? People don't call in sick.. ever.. unless they're basically so sick that they couldn't come in anyway (i.e. it is something really serious).

And what happens? The germs spread and everyone in the office ends up getting sick. It's a ridiculous way to do business - it lowers morale AND productivity.

I would never work for an employer that did this. When I get sick I stay at home.. and I expect the same courtesy from my office mates. My vacation days are separate from my sick days, the way it should be.

That's dumb, I get 130 sick days and separate vacation days, and I've never taken any sick days, because I don't get sick, while people who have unhealthy lifestyles get tons of time off.
 
That's dumb, I get 130 sick days and separate vacation days, and I've never taken any sick days, because I don't get sick, while people who have unhealthy lifestyles get tons of time off.

It is VERY dumb. My sister hates it but her job pays VERY well, including very generous bonuses.. so she puts up with it.

I get 130-150 sick days too.. or something like that. Obviously I don't use them all each year :p But I do call in sick maybe once a month.
 
Am I missing something?

130-150 sick "days"??? What?

This is a Canada is weird instance I assume. 130 days does seem absolutely nuts however.
 
That's dumb, I get 130 sick days and separate vacation days, and I've never taken any sick days, because I don't get sick, while people who have unhealthy lifestyles get tons of time off.

Or existing conditions. Although I'm now medication-free (yay!) I still need to get blood-tests done regularly. Though I suppose I could go into work after getting the blood-test done (where I live its in the mornings on some weekdays). Actually I'm in school so that doesn't really matter.
 
You guys get 130 sick days? I was clearly born in the wrong country. (Does that number come from a legal entitlement, e.g., are they akin to legal entitlements to weeks off for disabilities or pregnancy, like we have here?)

I think requiring doctor's notes for a routine "sick" day is overbearing. (Not to mention unfair if your employer does not provide healthcare, as Bugfatty pointed out.) A phone call the night before or the morning of should be sufficient. This is also why PTO is sometimes preferable to sick/vacation from a management perspective. Days off are days off, doesn't matter why you want them. (Although this does encourage you to come in when you're sick... even though functionally, a lot of places that make the distinction don't check up on you when you call in "sick" so really they're all the same anyway.)
 
You guys get 130 sick days? I was clearly born in the wrong country. (Does that number come from a legal entitlement, e.g., are they akin to legal entitlements to weeks off for disabilities or pregnancy, like we have here?)

Not a legal requirement. Warpus and I both work union jobs at universities.

They're not all fully paid, I think I get like 30 at full salary and then the rest at 70%.

They're pretty useless to me though, I've been at my job for a year and have taken zero sick days. I'd rather have five vacation days in exchange for all my sick days.
 
Am I missing something?

130-150 sick "days"??? What?

Short term disability programs. I get up to 6 months of it at a private company.

Basically if you're unable to work, your job continues to pay out your pay for the time frame. Mine is at 66% normal pay past 2 weeks. If I'm still unable to return to work after that, I start collecting private long term disability insurance.

Of course, in practice, the company is reluctant to pay out unless it's clear cut... and you end up having to sue them.
 
Well my last permanent job gave me 26 weeks full salary followed by 26 weeks half salary.
But no allowances and bonus when sick.

In the UK you write your own sick note up to 7 days then you have to get one from the doctor.
You have to phone up as soon as possible when you get sick and then every day or so depending what is wrong with you.

Most employers keep a record of when you are sick and the reason. I do not see a problem with that.

Where I have worked most people have tend to work if they have a minor cold and never take days off sick as an entitlement. But we did get reasonable holidays 25 to 30 days plus public holidays.
 
Companies definitely should not take actions that discourage the ill from taking off. I usually get a bad case of stomach flu every couple of years. It is certainly not something I would want to go to work with but at the same time it is certainly not something I waste my time and money on a doctor's visit for. Best system definitely would be a certain amount of non-vacation day sick days with a limit on how many you can use without a doctor's note.
 
Not a legal requirement. Warpus and I both work union jobs at universities.

They're not all fully paid, I think I get like 30 at full salary and then the rest at 70%.

They're pretty useless to me though, I've been at my job for a year and have taken zero sick days. I'd rather have five vacation days in exchange for all my sick days.
could you get a second job that also gives 150 sick days, and alternate working half the year at each to get 140% salary?
 
Back
Top Bottom