So um, how exactly does Sicilian Catholicism work?
More or less the same way that Roman Catholicism does, but with the Sicilian or Egyptian prince in the place of the Italian Emperor, and with no long dormant tradition of clerical independence to occasionally trouble things. At the moment, the Sicilians and Egyptians each run their own church, and have been quietly avoiding the issue of exactly which of them should be in charge. That's likely to change in the somewhat near future.
Dachs said:
And how do the Egyptian monarchs manage the Coptic Pope and the various Muslim imams?
The Muslims are overseen by a government department run by the senior cleric, but it rarely actually has to do anything. The Coptic Church is rather more difficult, and the Egyptians have never really had a consistent policy; sometimes they try and leave them be, sometimes they try and put puppets in charge. At the moment the policy is of inclusion in government and consideration of Coptic sensibilities as far as possible - the Coptic Pope's on the Council of State. This has been generally successful, but the rapprochement's breaking down a bit as Ethiopia and Makuria heat up.
Dachs said:
Does Hanafism mean anything different than it did/does in OTL?
Not really. A bit more liberal on superficial things - booze, in particular - but that's all.
Dachs said:
Does the incipient struggle between Alwa and the Makurian great kings have any religious overtones to it?
It does! Distinct religious overtones. Southern Makuria in general, and the Alwan eparchs in particular, have have been the recipient of a lot of activity from the revitalized Ethiopian church in the last couple of decades, and the Alwans are sort of in the process of setting themselves up as the defenders of Truth, Justice and the Coptic Way. The other major component is that Alwa's probably intrinsically richer than Makuria proper, but since it was so messed up when the Makurians took over the settlement was extremely one-sided. Now that's Alwa's recovering, the balance is being skewed.
Dachs said:
What's the deal with the Upper Egyptian barons?
They're barons. They live in Upper Egypt.

They're the big landowners and generally pretty much run the government of the far south. The center tends to let them carry on a fairly independent existence, so long as they pay taxes and keep the Makurian border quiet. A lot of them have significant interests in Makuria, and provide some of the Norman backing to the Makurian throne.
Thlayli said:
Am I pretty much in a state of perpetual war with the Muwahiddun?
Not full-blown war, no, but there is pretty much constant small-scale piracy and raiding going on.
Thlayli said:
How powerful is the entity of the monarchy in Sicily?
Very.
Dachs said:
ALSO how long is an update?
I thought three years was a good number, but I'm open to arguments for other options, if anyone feels particularly strongly.
ChiefDesigner said:
Able and willing to discuss certain plausibility issues regarding your Chinese AH f(Guangzhou should properly be called Nanyue, the name for the region at the time; Haishu is more accurately described as the Wu Kingdom
Yeah, I know, but if I called them that then China would look almost exactly like DaNES China, and it looks too much like that as it is.
Yui108 said:
Additionally, what was the nature of the Timurids, OTL?
Timur was the Mongol general who oversaw the conquest of Persia and the Middle East, and his descendants wound up running Persia and the Middle East. Ilkhans, more or less.