I could have posted this in the ask a published author thread, but i did not want to bump my own post there.
It is a fairly straightforward question, which i am thinking of these days:
Which of the two seems to be better in your view (if we are talking about a hypothetical, impossible case of all the magazines being of the same worth, and the works being equally populous in both cases) :
-To have works published in a single magazine
-To have works published in many magazines
The backdrop to my question is the realization of the second periodical publishing my work,and a possible third one to follow.
But i am not sure if scattering it around is the best strategy.
Granted, each periodical has its own audience, history, prestige and importance, but it seems hard to have work published month after month in a sole one. So i guess i have to go the route of presenting stories in many.
It is a fairly straightforward question, which i am thinking of these days:
Which of the two seems to be better in your view (if we are talking about a hypothetical, impossible case of all the magazines being of the same worth, and the works being equally populous in both cases) :
-To have works published in a single magazine
-To have works published in many magazines
The backdrop to my question is the realization of the second periodical publishing my work,and a possible third one to follow.
But i am not sure if scattering it around is the best strategy.
Granted, each periodical has its own audience, history, prestige and importance, but it seems hard to have work published month after month in a sole one. So i guess i have to go the route of presenting stories in many.