Birdjaguar said:
The law of probablilities only ensures that people will experience the unexplained. Adding the word "coincidences" is just spin. Can you show any evidence that such unxplained events are actually coincidental?
When I say coincidence I mean exactly that - two events coinciding that might imply a connection between them - but when there isn't one.
For example, my friend was over at my place a couple weeks ago, and I made a random remark about my couch: "I wish I had two couches... Then there'd be one for you and one for me!"
An hour after that she left and not even 30 seconds later I heard a knocking on my window. I looked out and it was her.. so I opened my patio door to see what she wanted.
Guess what - she found a couch in PERFECT condition, not even a 20 second walk away from my apartment. So I went to take a look at it, we grabbed it and brought it back to my place, and it's been serving me ever since.
Now, if I were a religious man, I might attribute this coincidence to a higher being - be it Jesus, Vishnu, Zeus, or the FSM.
But having studied statistics and probability in University I realize that these things are bound to happen from time to time - and that's why attributing the supernatural to such coincidences is silly.
Birdjaguar said:
But just because we cannot see a connection does not mean there isn't one.
To assume a connection without any proof at all is counterproductive and unscientific.