Harbringer said:
What do you mean by immune cells?
These are specialised cells that basically destroy foreign or otherwise undesirable material in the body. They're termed "immune" because of their role in destroying bacteria, viruses and so on, protecting the body from disease. However they also mop up stuff like dead cells and debris which, while it was once part of the body, is no longer useful. In a radiation burn radicals generated by ionizing radiation react with, and hence damage cells (in particular they can damage DNA). The "burn" is simply the way the body reacts to clean up the damaged or destroyed cells.
Ionising radiation can in some cases burn directly. Gamma radiation is just high frequency EM radiation, and when absorbed by the body can be converted into heat. The rise in temperature is then responsible for the damage cells.
Harbinger said:
Im also wondering how fusion releases energy? I read an article on it and it just confused the hell out of me....
OK, I'll try and keep this simple. The nucleus of an atom is held together by the strong nuclear force. The amount of energy required to pull a nucleus apart depends on the exact numbers of protons and neutrons in it, and is known as the nuclear binding energy. Owing to the way the way the competing electromagnetic and strong nuclear force work out, very small nuclei like hydrogen have very low nuclear binding energies. Up to a certain point, as the nucleus increases in size, so does the nuclear binding energy. For common isotopes it reaches a maximum at Iron-56. After that it gradually decreases as the nucleus increases in size, so Uranium-235 for example has a somewhat lower nuclear binding energy. There's a graph of this
here which might make things a bit clearer.
The point is that if I stick two small nuclei (e.g. two hydrogens or two deuteriums) together, I'll get a larger nucleus, with a higher nuclear binding energy per proton and neutron than I had when they were seperate. This extra energy is released.
If I go to isotopes heavier than iron, fusion no longer gives out energy. The nuclear binding energies are now lower as the elements get heavier. I'd have to put in extra energy to stick the nuclei together. However, I can now now use the reverse process. Split a very heavy nucleus (e.g. U-235) into two lighter nuclei which have higher nuclear binding energies, and again, that extra bit of energy is released.
So loosely speaking, very small nuclei are less "stable" than moderate size nuclei. Very heavy nuclei are also less "stable" than moderate size nuclei. Going from a less stable to a more stable state will release energy. The turning point is at about iron-56 which you can't get energy from using fission or fusion.