Overpopulation is a concern. Most people only want to live in a very small area near the major capital cities, almost all of which are on the coastline. Add to that people actively fighting against measures to improve the infrastructure to cater for higher populations for a variety of reasons and the frustratingly ignorant racist group who just don't want foreigners (although this generally means Arabs at the moment) here at all and so costing the visas high is a way to limit that desirability.I can't see why Australia limits their immigration so much. They sure would make even more dosh out of it.
I also can't see why they are so expensive. As if enrolling in a uni was for free or something.
Trying to escape Europe?So are France, Switzerland, Austria and so many others.
Australian Student visa is 415 ($450) for me alone.
I mean, c'mon, overpopulation? Sure, if you want to keep cities sprawling (which is baaad) then you can fill all the space you have rather quickly, but I think even though most of Australia is desert there's enough land for many many many many more times the current population. Maybe not that many. In any case, this simultaneous urban AND suburban culture is what hurts Australia a lot. The whole population of Australia could live in the land currently within Melbourne and it'd probably still be a low population density by European standards. I'm exaggerating here, but probably less than yod'd think.
According to wiki, their population is around 24 million, which is smaller than several individual cities if you count their metropolitan areas.
The problem with Australians is that the like to live in cities AND have their house with a back yard too. That's problematic because it makes public transportation less useful and less efficient (the more spread people are, the less people a bus picks up) and thus incentivizes private transportation, which can easily cause traffic jams, not to mention the pollution all those people generate.
Maybe, maybe not..
The problem with Australians is that the like to live in cities AND have their house with a back yard too. That's problematic because it makes public transportation less useful and less efficient (the more spread people are, the less people a bus picks up) and thus incentivizes private transportation, which can easily cause traffic jams, not to mention the pollution all those people generate.
True. It's up to you. But you have been saying "I'm thinking about mining some gold" and a stranger loped on by, handing you a pickaxe and pointing at a mountain.
I'm not a gold digger.
She didn't come by yesterday, so I guess it's up to the parties tonight.
I mean, c'mon, overpopulation? Sure, if you want to keep cities sprawling (which is baaad) then you can fill all the space you have rather quickly, but I think even though most of Australia is desert there's enough land for many many many many more times the current population. Maybe not that many. In any case, this simultaneous urban AND suburban culture is what hurts Australia a lot. The whole population of Australia could live in the land currently within Melbourne and it'd probably still be a low population density by European standards. I'm exaggerating here, but probably less than yod'd think.
I think it was Masada was saying that Ausie laws discourage the building of apartment buildings.
I think I just finally internalized a very important lesson today.