Retirement plans.

Try a quick experiment in Excel.

Assume a 5% rate of return, put in $100 per month, for 30 years, and see what it's worth at the end.

When you get that first "real" job, that's when you need to start saving away for both future expenditures and for retirement.

-- Ravensfire
 
Red Stranger said:
Hi,

It's never too early to prepare for the future.

Very wise.

Right now I'm thinking about retirement plans. Do any of you have any advice? Should I put some money into Roth IRA, get investment property or try some other approach? What do you recommend?

I'm surprised at your age your thinking that far ahead, but kudos. Personally in your shoes I'd go for the Roth IRA plan for security, but expand a bit of your money into other areas. A tracker investment plan maybe, or just do a little on the side investment in companies you feel might do well. I think a REIT would be a good idea too? At your age as long as you keep something back, with your potential earnings I'm sure you'll end up in a sound financial position.

Your in a position where you can make a few investments and take a few risks, but to be honest why ask us? I'm sure a financial consultant could break down all the options and provde a better overall strategy than anyone here.
 
Whomp said:
"The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest”. Albert Einstein

Be careful with that thinking Davo.
I heard about all kinds of problems like that when I was your age. Don't wait it will blow you're mind in even 10 years.
Yeah but dude, I still live at home with my parents and am in a minimum wage job - I think my priorities have to be getting a decent paid job and moving out first before I think about retirement!
 
.Shane. said:
No.

Its the ultimate investment because you get use out of it while its appreciating. You can't live in stock certificates.

I have to disagree with you there. A house doesn't necessarily appreciate in value, and requires maintenance. Unless you happen to be very good at riding the peaks and troughs of your housing market, I'm pretty certain that investment in stocks or 401k is the better route.

Even the best years in the DC Housing Market are only providing 3% greater returns than what I've averaged on my financial investments
 
ComradeDavo said:
Yeah but dude, I still live at home with my parents and am in a minimum wage job - I think my priorities have to be getting a decent paid job and moving out first before I think about retirement!

I still managed to save when I worked a min. wage job. First step is to get out of a min. wage job and work retail at least, gotta be 1 buck an hour higher.
 
JerichoHill said:
I still managed to save when I worked a min. wage job. First step is to get out of a min. wage job and work retail at least, gotta be 1 buck an hour higher.
I am in retail.
 
I understand Davo. Take care of immediate needs but try to focus on your ATM card. This may sound corny but for a month write down how you spent that cash. I think you'll be shocked. It's too easy to hit the machine, pull some pounds out and have no idea where it all went. I'd bet if you can get a handle on this you become more frugal.

On another topic....you've started to learn about wines. Any thoughts about learning to become a sommelier? I think it would be a very cool job.
 
Whomp said:
I understand Davo. Take care of immediate needs but try to focus on your ATM card. This may sound corny but for a month write down how you spent that cash. I think you'll be shocked. It's too easy to hit the machine, pull some pounds out and have no idea where it all went. I'd bet if you can get a handle on this you become more frugal.

On another topic....you've started to learn about wines. Any thoughts about learning to become a sommelier? I think it would be a very cool job.
Well i'm sure not sure what to do work wise at the moment as i'm thinking about moving to London (or to live with my girlfriend in brighton) some time next year...and the job i'm in at the moment is felxiable with hours and so forth which I need at current.

As for cash spendature, i'm probably alot more careful than most people my age!:D
 
I basically had to start at zero again at 27, since uni drained away all my saving :(

but now I'm using all three pillars, including the voluntary "third pillar" that allows me to put away about CHF 6000.-- a year tax-free. what's even better is that I can access this money when I build my own home :)
 
Red Stranger said:
Hi,

It's never too early to prepare for the future. Right now I'm thinking about retirement plans. Do any of you have any advice? Should I put some money into Roth IRA, get investment property or try some other approach? What do you recommend?

I recommend you start with an education at someplace different from where you're getting it now.
 
JerichoHill said:
I have to disagree with you there. A house doesn't necessarily appreciate in value, and requires maintenance. Unless you happen to be very good at riding the peaks and troughs of your housing market, I'm pretty certain that investment in stocks or 401k is the better route.

Even the best years in the DC Housing Market are only providing 3% greater returns than what I've averaged on my financial investments

Let me clarify. I don't mean to put everything into owning homes.

But, for the non-financially trained person, its a great initial investment because you get use out of it. What use did you get out of those stocks? Were you living rent free because you owned stocks?

So, no, don't plan for retirement by buying 4 homes. But, a home, free and clear, is probably the best thing for the lay person to shoot for.
 
I follow my grandfather's system by having no private pension and instead buying stocks. I am one of Sweden's top stockmarket experts in my age group (15 years old) IMO a pension plan can't beat my 25% a year. Your money is also freer if you invest it yourself. Your house isn't an asset since it doesn't give you money and you need it to live (I don't think you can sell your house and be homeless) Recomended reading: Rich dad, poor dad by Robert Kiosakyi
 
AL_DA_GREAT said:
I follow my grandfather's system by having no private pension and instead buying stocks. I am one of Sweden's top stockmarket experts in my age group (15 years old) IMO a pension plan can't beat my 25% a year. Your money is also freer if you invest it yourself. Your house isn't an asset since it doesn't give you money and you need it to live (I don't think you can sell your house and be homeless) Recomended reading: Rich dad, poor dad by Robert Kiosakyi
If you can produce half that 25% return annually over 30 years you'll be Warren Buffet. ;)
Btw in the US you can invest in stocks inside a retirement plan and no taxes.
 
Whomp said:
If you can produce half that 25% return annually over 30 years you'll be Warren Buffet. ;)
Btw in the US you can invest in stocks inside a retirement plan and no taxes.
Warren Buffet has 33% (huge difference). I shall write to the Swedish goverment telling them about the investing in stocks in your retirment plan thing. The proble is that I am planning on retiring way before 65 so it isn't smart for me to use a retirment plan.
 
Riesstiu IV said:
I plan on dieing in some freak accident around 50.
Book a meeting with a finacial planner. They can work mericles. Remember, Ray krok (Mcdonalds guy) was a nobody untill he was 55 and found a resturant. he became rich in his late 60s. You live in a capitalist country, use its advantages.
 
AL_DA_GREAT said:
Warren Buffet has 33% (huge difference). I shall write to the Swedish goverment telling them about the investing in stocks in your retirment plan thing. The proble is that I am planning on retiring way before 65 so it isn't smart for me to use a retirment plan.
Uh...sorry but you're not even close.

If he was averaging 33% annually since 1968 it would mean the share price was doubling it's value every ~2.18 years.
The "A" shares have appreciated from $7455/share in January of 1990 to $105, 475/share today.

Oops you're right he did. I stand corrected. Al you are Warren Buffet.
 
AL_DA_GREAT said:
Book a meeting with a finacial planner. They can work mericles. Remember, Ray krok (Mcdonalds guy) was a nobody untill he was 55 and found a resturant. he became rich in his late 60s. You live in a capitalist country, use its advantages.

I was only joking. I don't have money problems since I live a fairly frugal lifestyle. I'm also thankful to have a parent help me plan university expenses so that I have no debt after graduation. I just imagine that when I reach retirement age, the world will be a far more horsehockey place to live in. There will be more people and fewer resources to go around the table.

Edit: Also, I'm now lol at the notion of a 15 year old giving financial advice.
 
Whomp said:
Uh...sorry but you're not even close.

If he was averaging 33% annually since 1968 it would mean the share price was doubling it's value every ~2.18 years.
The "A" shares have appreciated from $7455/share in January of 1990 to $105, 475/share today.
2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096
You under estimate the power of compound intrest. He also bought on margin.
 
Whomp said:
I think you're giving bad advice.
You don't have to wait till you're 59 1/2 to withdraw from a IRA or Roth. If you retire early you can withdraw earlier.
You can also withdraw for first time home purchases and higher education costs.

Another point, who said you have to be conservative in retirement accounts? You can trade all you want in a IRA account so why wouldn't you want the tax free or tax deferred growth especially at a young age?
$600 tax break on a IRA would be a substantial return on a $4000 contribution and this doesn't even account for the returns made on investment.

On 401k's (or SEP's if you're self employed) you are way off. Company matching dollar for dollar is significant (100% return on investment). You can also withdraw shares of company stock through "net unrealized appreciation" is also a substantial benefit. Aside from my deferred comp this is one item that allows me to avoid my high tax rate.

A.) Show me a company that matches dollar for dollar ("100%") w/ the 401k. I know the NFL matches 2 for 1 (best around, that I know of), but realiistically we're talking about 5 or 6%. By IRS law, YOU can only contribute up to 15k a year, so we're not exactly talking about a 'pot of gold at the end of a rainbow', being gifted to you by your employer. Some may be higher than 5 or 6%, but the gov't gives 5% to it's spoiled-rotten federal employees, so let's be realistic here. Chump change.

B.) You cannot get an -input- tax benefit on BOTH the 401k and IRAs if you contribute to both. By default, my 401k contributions are tax deferred, thus whatever I put into an IRA is taxed up front.

C.) 401k plans don't make as much sense now as they did a few years ago, before the tax law changes. The benefit has been reduced. If you still want to get the max matching -sure, why not- percentage, but beyond that you can easily achieve higher yields (with investment-friendly tax laws) by investing the money elsewhere.

D.) I'm giving bad advice? You're the one talking about taking loans from a retirement account. That NEVER makes sense. What do you think it's interest free, even for 'special circumstances'? I've never heard any advisor or financial expert say anything to the contrary - that is, it's NEVER ideal. Nothing to see here, but a bunch or red tape. This only applies as an option for someone, if they suddenly find themself in the poor house.

E.) Where can you invest 401k money? Gov't securities (YAWN), bonds, and perhaps various flavors of stock funds, say common stock (S&P 500), or a small-cap fund, international stocks... and that's typically about it - at best. INDEX FUNDS... might as well tie my money up into real estate. Granted I'm actively shifting stuff around, but come on... it's pretty LAME.

F.) Of course you can go wild day-trading the money in your IRA. It's an investing account like any general one. The reason I said 'conservative', is because the simple fact of the matter is, if you take some losses in the precious IRA, guess what - you can't readily reinforce it, and attack again. The IRA account is like a 'glass investment' - careful! Don't break it! It's very delicate. To me, it just seems less flexible, less liquid, etc. Best to just pick good funds, and let it ride. SLOWLY, over time. I.e.... big deal. But yeah - it's not unbridled, thus I don't feel comfortable messing with it much. "Better be careful with what picks I invest in... because if I get it wrong, the account takes a hit, and I can't get back to par until next year, when I can contribute!" -Psychologically, it's an investing account with it's hands tied, that's how I think of it. If you want to go hog-wild with your IRA, fine. For me, that's just a bit awkward. Why bother anyway, since it's so relatively small to my general investing account - less leverage. Thus, the IRA is a 'novelty item', for retirement. Sure, I pick good funds... and pick specialty funds based on what the market will be doing, but whatever. Overall, it's not exactly blowing my mind with excitement.

G.) Early withdrawals... if you become disabled. Otherwise, you can wait 'til 59.5 like the rest of us. "Early retirement"... sure, but that doesn't mean you get some special dispensation to start making retirement account withdrawals. This is a pretty exotic idea... where are you getting this? I somehow think whatever it is - doesn't apply to me in any way. There may be 'highly special case' situations, but for normal people like me, no. Though... "I wish".

H.) Retirement accounts in general... even at max contributions (which I do - only for the fun of it, might as well, since I am a money-saving machine), these are nothing sexy. They give you a nice little 'novelty item' bonus, after you've busted your @ss working for 40-50 years, thus making most people feel they're "making a smart move". Maybe I'm sounding too harsh here, hey, like I said, I have them. I use the tools available. But, I FIRMLY believe the money can be more effectively used elsewhere, to achieve higher yeilds (yes, even after taxes). That being the case, you have to ask, "what's the point".

The point is... most people aren't like me. Like this guy right next to me.... he started putting like 15% of his paycheck into a 401k in 1997, set 85% of the allocation to common stock fund (S&P 500), and didn't even LOOK AT IT since, until I got to talking with him last week about it - we logged in and I gave him some pointers.

See, for most people, they'd rather work... DAY in, DAY out, like zombies, for 60-stinkin' years, and not even bother messing with the money they're spending their whole lives making in the first place. THEN... the focus suddenly gets lost, and shifts towards 'career', 'job', 'what I do for a living'... next thing you know, you're indoctrinated, and spending your whole life working... and you actually come to believe "that's what it's all about".

C'mon now. Think outside the box. Me? My sheer hatred of working for a living - like some slave to a grindstone, for some petty $20-30 bucks an hour, as MY LIFE slowly goes by... that drove me to consider 'what else is there'.

These accounts just aren't sexy, man. See, putting 2k shares on a couple of oils Wed. morning @ 10:30 EST when they squeezed (based on missed expectations), and making a quick $500 in 8 minutes, and then shorting as the prices inevitably fell in line with the fundies (as reported), for a quick thou in about 3/4 hour subsequently.... that's the way to go. That 'floats my boat'... not sitting at some desk, wasting my time, waiting for some stranger to come up so I can say, "how may I help you, SIR?"... or, waiting for some type-A personality boss to come around, pestering me.

To each their own. I'm one of the most 'un-indoctrinate-able' people around. So, Mister Panda, that's my approach. I dont' call it 'bad advice', I just call it the road less traveled... because most people just stay on the one they see right in front of them, that they were pointed down, that everybody else is on. For someone that is such a stingy bastard, I am prepared to 'risk' 'funny money', because that's simply the name of the game. It IS a game, really. You have to realize that. Then you detach from the emotion that money inspires, and you can go in and play. And it's not that hard to win. Hundreds... thousands. I haven't got to the millions yet (still a rookie), but I 'll keep you posted.
 
Back
Top Bottom