RFC Civilizations in Abundance
- Thread starter Jarkov
- Start date
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
I still don't think it's a good idea to be so restrictive for the Balkans. I usually don't found Wien and I kept that 2nd Greek city because the stupid AI founded it. You're really encouraging "bad" habits for RFC by forcing cities in close range to be founded. 
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
The Sumerians were a good joke.
Seriously, the indy chariots were a hoot. lol
I actually misread the 3rd criteria as 2000 AD and was all set about building galleys and settlers to move to Australia and New Zealand (safest places on Rhye's earth) when the 3/3 kicked in.
Seriously, the indy chariots were a hoot. lol
I actually misread the 3rd criteria as 2000 AD and was all set about building galleys and settlers to move to Australia and New Zealand (safest places on Rhye's earth) when the 3/3 kicked in.
Linkman226
#anarchy
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2007
- Messages
- 2,493
Any way to make this compatible with RFC Dawn of Civilization?
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
I think the Zulu is the best addition you made to RFC. It was really touch and go for a while until I conquered all the way to Ethiopia. The only time I've seen where a swordsman can kill a rifleman and an impi (amped up to 10 strength and all kinds of promotions) kill an infantry.
I think the 3rd UHV is broken though: I just captured the last Dutch city in Mali in 1930 and it still says not yet in 1932.
EDIT: OK NEVER MIND, you have a bug in the 3rd UHV--your Python is using 1940 rather than 1930. I won in 1940.
I think the 3rd UHV is broken though: I just captured the last Dutch city in Mali in 1930 and it still says not yet in 1932.
EDIT: OK NEVER MIND, you have a bug in the 3rd UHV--your Python is using 1940 rather than 1930. I won in 1940.
Attachments
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
No, keep it for 1940, or even later (1950) when all the independence movements started. It would be "historically" challenging if all of Africa were free before then.
You cannot build anymore spearmen (impi) once you know engineering. So I was trying my hardest not to lose any more of them after the initial blitz. It would be really better if impi were made either pikemen (but they are rather expensive) or swordsmen or axemen (cheaper) which can be built until gunpowder or civil service is known.
You cannot build anymore spearmen (impi) once you know engineering. So I was trying my hardest not to lose any more of them after the initial blitz. It would be really better if impi were made either pikemen (but they are rather expensive) or swordsmen or axemen (cheaper) which can be built until gunpowder or civil service is known.
great.taurus
Warlord
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2010
- Messages
- 149
That sure would be something, wouldn't it?
At the moment I'm splitting my play time almost 50/50 between them. When I play one I cant help but miss all the features from the other.
No, keep it for 1940, or even later (1950) when all the independence movements started. It would be "historically" challenging if all of Africa were free before then.
You cannot build anymore spearmen (impi) once you know engineering. So I was trying my hardest not to lose any more of them after the initial blitz. It would be really better if impi were made either pikemen (but they are rather expensive) or swordsmen or axemen (cheaper) which can be built until gunpowder or civil service is known.
The problem with the Impis is not that they can't be built after engineering, but that they can't be built at all - which is a bug that has already been solved, and will be in the next update.
I chose 1930 because it would be a bit too easy for the Zulu if it were a later date.
Linkman226
#anarchy
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2007
- Messages
- 2,493
That sure would be something, wouldn't it?
At the moment I'm splitting my play time almost 50/50 between them. When I play one I cant help but miss all the features from the other.
Haha I feel the exact same way.
IrishDragon
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2006
- Messages
- 522
Having played a game from when the Celts start to the end, I've noticed a lack of civs rising again. I think only Greece rose again around the modern period, and the Incas towards the very end, with <20 turns left. While I think that the 2nd chance collapse is good, maybe for some civs that historically did collapse, particularily the ancient ones, it could be returned to normal collapse?
In terms of the game itself, it was interesting enough, with Britain winning a time victory fairly comfortably, with Russia second. The HRE survived to the end, being powerful in the Middle Ages as an Islamic power before being vassalised by Spain and forced to become Christian, then became Britains vassal. Both Persia and the HRE held Incan cities until the near the end when the Incas respawned. France was powerful for a period, before becoming Soviet and collapsing and never returning. Britain vassalised Holland, HRE, Persia, India, Zulu by the end of the game. Germany never got going and was eventually destroyed by Russia. Egypt was powerful for most of the game before collapsing. The US started slowly, but eventually vassalised the Native Americans who lasted until the end and occupied a few Aztec cities. The US finished 3rd in score at war with China who was 4th and had a Khmer vassal. Spain was 5th I think. The Aztecs didn't last long at all, and don't remember seeing the Mayans. Korea lasted until near the end before being taken over by China. Japan was a mid-power Russian vassal. Turkey controlled the Anatolia, shared the mid-east with British Persia after a war and several African cities, and vassalised Arabia, and Egypt until Egypts collapse. Mali was a mid-power, being a British vassal before freeing itself. By the looks of things Ethopia lasted a few centuries before collapsing and Egypt moved in.
Sumeria collapsed early and Babylon was taken out by Persia.
The Western European powers were Christian, Russia Islamic, Egypt & Arabia Islamic and Turkey Jewish.
I played as the Celts, holding only Ireland, Iceland, Greenland and a South American city by the end, and being near the bottom of the score-board throughout
Like other poster have said, it would be great if you could merge this with some of Dawn of Civs features.
In terms of the game itself, it was interesting enough, with Britain winning a time victory fairly comfortably, with Russia second. The HRE survived to the end, being powerful in the Middle Ages as an Islamic power before being vassalised by Spain and forced to become Christian, then became Britains vassal. Both Persia and the HRE held Incan cities until the near the end when the Incas respawned. France was powerful for a period, before becoming Soviet and collapsing and never returning. Britain vassalised Holland, HRE, Persia, India, Zulu by the end of the game. Germany never got going and was eventually destroyed by Russia. Egypt was powerful for most of the game before collapsing. The US started slowly, but eventually vassalised the Native Americans who lasted until the end and occupied a few Aztec cities. The US finished 3rd in score at war with China who was 4th and had a Khmer vassal. Spain was 5th I think. The Aztecs didn't last long at all, and don't remember seeing the Mayans. Korea lasted until near the end before being taken over by China. Japan was a mid-power Russian vassal. Turkey controlled the Anatolia, shared the mid-east with British Persia after a war and several African cities, and vassalised Arabia, and Egypt until Egypts collapse. Mali was a mid-power, being a British vassal before freeing itself. By the looks of things Ethopia lasted a few centuries before collapsing and Egypt moved in.
Sumeria collapsed early and Babylon was taken out by Persia.
The Western European powers were Christian, Russia Islamic, Egypt & Arabia Islamic and Turkey Jewish.
I played as the Celts, holding only Ireland, Iceland, Greenland and a South American city by the end, and being near the bottom of the score-board throughout
Like other poster have said, it would be great if you could merge this with some of Dawn of Civs features.
The mod looks pretty cool! I'm gonna play as the Celts and see how well I can do.
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
Speaking of respawns: I just had the Eastern Roman Empire respawn in Rome, as well as Jerusalem and Trebizond. More like the whole Roman Empire except for what I controlled (which was all of the Balkans, including Greece and Constantinople) 
Say, why did you get rid of the >10 city tech disadvantage? Now Russia is like so easy that my spaceship arrived in 1924. You might also want to build in some animosity between the Mongols and Russia (they vassalized to me spontaneously even though Kublai Khan was annoyed at me).
Next up is Celts for me too (I'm really daunted by the Byzantines and Germans are just impossible).
Say, why did you get rid of the >10 city tech disadvantage? Now Russia is like so easy that my spaceship arrived in 1924. You might also want to build in some animosity between the Mongols and Russia (they vassalized to me spontaneously even though Kublai Khan was annoyed at me).
Next up is Celts for me too (I'm really daunted by the Byzantines and Germans are just impossible).
I managed to survive the Romans, and managed to eventually burn Rome down. My cities in Spain and France were a lost cause, though. And I have a bad feeling about the ones in Great Britain.
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
Can you tell me what "central Europea" means for the 1st Celt goal? (e.g. does Frankfurt count?)
Never mind, I looked at Victory.py and Frankfurt certainly counts. (how else can you get iron besides in England or Spain) What I don't understand is why you left out the sheep and the northern coast of Anatolia for the Anatolia goal (it starts 1E of the sheep and goes to the 2nd wheat).
Never mind, I looked at Victory.py and Frankfurt certainly counts. (how else can you get iron besides in England or Spain) What I don't understand is why you left out the sheep and the northern coast of Anatolia for the Anatolia goal (it starts 1E of the sheep and goes to the 2nd wheat).
AnotherPacifist
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,878
Similar threads
