learner gamer
King
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2009
- Messages
- 657
Some great points there @Soirana. Indeed, I have a couple of follow up questions for you or any other of the gurus who are posting in this thread. To be precise, given the point @pigwswill makes here:
(i) is it routinely the case that settling a commerce site (eg 1N of rice) is better than settling a hammer rich site (eg 1NW of rice); and
(ii) why are people preferring the commerce site here?
I ask – and it's of course directly relevant to @pigswill’s decision – because, having played a fair few emperor and immortal maps – I’ve found there are times when settling a hammer rich second city is better than settling a strong commerce site. Of course, the appeal of a commerce site is boosted by the bureaucracy civic...but there are times when I’ve found that a second city providing early hammers has provided more units, which have enabled the capture of an AI bureaucracy capital.
Why are people therefore generally preferring the settlement of 1N of rice (for commerce) over 1NW of rice (for hammers)? Is perhaps the bit I’m missing that much depends on the timing of your attack (as well as the type of AI capital you might capture, which is unknown here so in early in this game)...the more your first (or key) war(s) is (are) likely to come after civil service, the more you want to favour a strong commerce site over hammers. As an aside BTW, does this point also have any bearing on how far gamers are prepared to compromise surrounding cities to nab that ideal bureaucracy site?
I suspect that there's a body of thought that the optimum city development strategy is to identify a site for a very powerful capital (which benefits from bureaucracy of course) and then fit in other cities around it rather than try to fit in several average cities in the same area. This would certainly explain the dotmaps that have been suggested and the emphasis on 1N of rice as the next city.
(i) is it routinely the case that settling a commerce site (eg 1N of rice) is better than settling a hammer rich site (eg 1NW of rice); and
(ii) why are people preferring the commerce site here?
I ask – and it's of course directly relevant to @pigswill’s decision – because, having played a fair few emperor and immortal maps – I’ve found there are times when settling a hammer rich second city is better than settling a strong commerce site. Of course, the appeal of a commerce site is boosted by the bureaucracy civic...but there are times when I’ve found that a second city providing early hammers has provided more units, which have enabled the capture of an AI bureaucracy capital.
Why are people therefore generally preferring the settlement of 1N of rice (for commerce) over 1NW of rice (for hammers)? Is perhaps the bit I’m missing that much depends on the timing of your attack (as well as the type of AI capital you might capture, which is unknown here so in early in this game)...the more your first (or key) war(s) is (are) likely to come after civil service, the more you want to favour a strong commerce site over hammers. As an aside BTW, does this point also have any bearing on how far gamers are prepared to compromise surrounding cities to nab that ideal bureaucracy site?