blastoidstalker
The Geographer
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 529
They all should be identical. It sound like everything is fine.
AlanH said:Not unless we want to exclude spectators.
Indeed - I am considering sitting out the next SGOTM so that I can provide suitable cutting commentary on everyone's game.AlanH said:This is a spectator sport. You should expect lurkers to be reading your team threads.
ruff_hi said:Indeed - I am considering sitting out the next SGOTM so that I can provide suitable cutting commentary on everyone's game.
ruff_hi said:The other option is that I am on ALL teams as the resident critic.
This does bring up a question, I am not sure if it addressed anywhere or is really relavent.ruff_hi said:The other option is that I am on ALL teams as the resident critic.
Do not get me wrong, the spectator sport aspect of SGOTM is very important and I fully support encoraging partisipation. However, even with the clear GOTM rules about posting spoiler info some people still make mistakes. Perhaps some sort of "lurkers charter" could help by setting out what sort of post you should avoid.Methos said:Lurkers are welcome in my opinion. That's how I got involved in the Civ3 SGOTM.
AlanH said:I see no indication that lurker comments have had any significant effect on teams' activities. Random lurker posts are actually fairly low level.
The Civ3 community has managed to play ten SGOTMs pretty well, in an honour-based competition with minimal rules and lightweight referee-ing. I hope the Civ4 community can see its way clear to maintaining that tradition. I really don't have time or energy or enthusiasm to create a complex structure of rules and regulations and policing activities. If SGOTM gets to the point where it needs that to survive then it will be sad ... and someone else will have to run it.
Rex Tyrannus said:Hear, hear! This is a gentlemen's game.